The squirrel barrier concept and its bearing on the evolution of aerial mammals.

IF 2.7 Q2 ECOLOGY
Norberto P Giannini, Alan Cannell
{"title":"The squirrel barrier concept and its bearing on the evolution of aerial mammals.","authors":"Norberto P Giannini, Alan Cannell","doi":"10.1186/s12862-026-02532-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three vertebrate lineages conquered powered fight in different epochs of the Phanerozoic: pterosaurs, dinosaurs (birds) and mammals (bats). The evolutionary mechanisms proposed for the demanding transition to powered flight have been contentious. For mammals, recent evidence suggests that the Darwinian hypothesis of a gliding transition is supported, based on aerodynamic and paleo-atmosphere reconstructions. However, it is surprising that the many (at least 12) confirmed, independent lineages of gliding mammals that existed since the Jurassic to the present never evolved powered flight. To explain this, Pennycuick in 2008 advanced the theoretical concept of the squirrel barrier: gliding mammals face a tradeoff between the cost of abandoning their agile arboreal lifestyle, and the potential gains of powered flight, thereby limiting the evolution of the higher-aspect-ratio wings required for achieving the latter. This concept was seldom discussed, used or tested. Here we examine critically the squirrel barrier concept and its implicit components, contrasting its predictions with available evidence, specifically from morphology, aerodynamics, and fossils. We found the concept highly relevant, and more complex than originally stated. A more nuanced approach to the probable conditions that must be met to transition from the locomotor style of ancestors to flying descendants reveals several intermediate such barriers, of which the squirrel barrier is one requiring profound evolutionary changes. Glide distance is a measure of glide efficiency, because the longer the glide the better the use of the large amount of energy invested in climbing up to the launch point in the canopy. Based on observational data and aerodynamics, we hypothesize that colugos (Dermoptera: Cynocephalidae) are able to maximize glide distance and glide ratio beyond average performance and thus might be beyond the squirrel barrier as proposed by Pennycuick, but still falling too short of reaching sustained powered flight, which constitute an additional, \"hard\" flight barrier.</p>","PeriodicalId":93910,"journal":{"name":"BMC ecology and evolution","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13430832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC ecology and evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-026-02532-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three vertebrate lineages conquered powered fight in different epochs of the Phanerozoic: pterosaurs, dinosaurs (birds) and mammals (bats). The evolutionary mechanisms proposed for the demanding transition to powered flight have been contentious. For mammals, recent evidence suggests that the Darwinian hypothesis of a gliding transition is supported, based on aerodynamic and paleo-atmosphere reconstructions. However, it is surprising that the many (at least 12) confirmed, independent lineages of gliding mammals that existed since the Jurassic to the present never evolved powered flight. To explain this, Pennycuick in 2008 advanced the theoretical concept of the squirrel barrier: gliding mammals face a tradeoff between the cost of abandoning their agile arboreal lifestyle, and the potential gains of powered flight, thereby limiting the evolution of the higher-aspect-ratio wings required for achieving the latter. This concept was seldom discussed, used or tested. Here we examine critically the squirrel barrier concept and its implicit components, contrasting its predictions with available evidence, specifically from morphology, aerodynamics, and fossils. We found the concept highly relevant, and more complex than originally stated. A more nuanced approach to the probable conditions that must be met to transition from the locomotor style of ancestors to flying descendants reveals several intermediate such barriers, of which the squirrel barrier is one requiring profound evolutionary changes. Glide distance is a measure of glide efficiency, because the longer the glide the better the use of the large amount of energy invested in climbing up to the launch point in the canopy. Based on observational data and aerodynamics, we hypothesize that colugos (Dermoptera: Cynocephalidae) are able to maximize glide distance and glide ratio beyond average performance and thus might be beyond the squirrel barrier as proposed by Pennycuick, but still falling too short of reaching sustained powered flight, which constitute an additional, "hard" flight barrier.

松鼠屏障概念及其对空中哺乳动物进化的影响。
三种脊椎动物谱系在显生宙的不同时期征服了有力的战斗:翼龙、恐龙(鸟类)和哺乳动物(蝙蝠)。向动力飞行过渡的进化机制一直存在争议。对于哺乳动物,最近的证据表明,基于空气动力学和古大气重建,达尔文关于滑翔过渡的假设得到了支持。然而,令人惊讶的是,从侏罗纪到现在存在的许多(至少12个)已证实的独立滑翔哺乳动物谱系从未进化出动力飞行。为了解释这一点,Pennycuick在2008年提出了松鼠屏障的理论概念:滑翔哺乳动物面临着放弃敏捷的树栖生活方式的代价和动力飞行的潜在收益之间的权衡,从而限制了实现后者所需的高展弦比翅膀的进化。这个概念很少被讨论、使用或测试。在这里,我们批判性地检查松鼠屏障概念及其隐含成分,将其预测与现有证据,特别是形态学,空气动力学和化石进行对比。我们发现这个概念非常相关,而且比最初陈述的更复杂。一种更为细致入微的方法揭示了从运动的祖先转变为飞行的后代所必须满足的可能条件,揭示了几个中间的障碍,其中松鼠障碍是一个需要深刻进化变化的障碍。滑翔距离是衡量滑翔效率的一个指标,因为滑翔的时间越长,在爬升到伞顶的起飞点时投入的大量能量就越能得到更好的利用。基于观测数据和空气动力学,我们假设鼯猴(翅目:鼯猴科)能够最大限度地提高滑翔距离和滑翔比,从而超越了Pennycuick提出的松鼠屏障,但仍然无法达到持续的动力飞行,这构成了一个额外的“硬”飞行屏障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书