Kelsey H DeMonte, Mirza J Lugo-Neris, Bridget J Perry
{"title":"Assessing School-Based Speech-Language Pathologists' Perspectives on Neurodiversity-Affirming Practices for Autistic Students.","authors":"Kelsey H DeMonte, Mirza J Lugo-Neris, Bridget J Perry","doi":"10.1044/2026_LSHSS-25-00080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine current school-based speech-language pathologists' (SLPs') perspectives on neurodiversity-affirming (ND-affirming) practices for autistic students and how their current clinical practices align with ND-affirming practices.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 150 school-based SLPs completed an original online survey in its entirety. The survey contained 5-point Likert scale items (ranging from <i>strongly disagree</i> to <i>strongly agree</i>) as well as multiple-choice questions. Survey items were used to determine school-based SLP beliefs in the purpose of speech-language therapy services for autistic students and their perspectives on ND-affirming practices for this population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although almost 92% of participants reported awareness of the neurodiversity movement, a majority of participants (54%) reported a lack of confidence in writing goals and providing therapy to autistic students in an ND-affirming way. Participants reported social media as the most popular source of information related to the neurodiversity movement. When presented with goal areas and therapy approaches that were either ND-affirming or based on the medical model of disability, only 2% of participants responded to all of the goal area statements in a way that aligned with ND-affirming practices, and just under 3% of participants responded to all of the therapy approach statements in a way that aligned with ND-affirming practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on participant responses to statements related to the practical implementation of ND-affirming practices, most school-based SLPs did not demonstrate alignment with goal writing and treatment approaches that are ND-affirming. This suggests that school-based SLPs may benefit from further education on ND-affirming practices in order to successfully implement these strategies in their workplaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":54326,"journal":{"name":"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools","volume":" ","pages":"926-951"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_LSHSS-25-00080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine current school-based speech-language pathologists' (SLPs') perspectives on neurodiversity-affirming (ND-affirming) practices for autistic students and how their current clinical practices align with ND-affirming practices.
Method: A total of 150 school-based SLPs completed an original online survey in its entirety. The survey contained 5-point Likert scale items (ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree) as well as multiple-choice questions. Survey items were used to determine school-based SLP beliefs in the purpose of speech-language therapy services for autistic students and their perspectives on ND-affirming practices for this population.
Results: Although almost 92% of participants reported awareness of the neurodiversity movement, a majority of participants (54%) reported a lack of confidence in writing goals and providing therapy to autistic students in an ND-affirming way. Participants reported social media as the most popular source of information related to the neurodiversity movement. When presented with goal areas and therapy approaches that were either ND-affirming or based on the medical model of disability, only 2% of participants responded to all of the goal area statements in a way that aligned with ND-affirming practices, and just under 3% of participants responded to all of the therapy approach statements in a way that aligned with ND-affirming practices.
Conclusions: Based on participant responses to statements related to the practical implementation of ND-affirming practices, most school-based SLPs did not demonstrate alignment with goal writing and treatment approaches that are ND-affirming. This suggests that school-based SLPs may benefit from further education on ND-affirming practices in order to successfully implement these strategies in their workplaces.
期刊介绍:
Mission: LSHSS publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to the practice of audiology and speech-language pathology in the schools, focusing on children and adolescents. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research and is designed to promote development and analysis of approaches concerning the delivery of services to the school-aged population. LSHSS seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of audiology and speech-language pathology as practiced in schools, including aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; childhood apraxia of speech; classroom acoustics; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; fluency disorders; hearing-assistive technology; language disorders; literacy disorders including reading, writing, and spelling; motor speech disorders; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; voice disorders.