Supply chain circularity and public perception in synthetic hair manufacturing: A case study.

IF 2.2
Odunayo Lawal, Oluwatoyin Deborah Adesanya, Oluwafemi Awolesi
{"title":"Supply chain circularity and public perception in synthetic hair manufacturing: A case study.","authors":"Odunayo Lawal, Oluwatoyin Deborah Adesanya, Oluwafemi Awolesi","doi":"10.1080/10962247.2026.2639372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines how supply-chain circularity (SCC) translates into firm performance in Nigeria's synthetic-hair industry by testing a mediated pathway from SCC to resource-utilization efficiency (RUE) and onward to operational efficiency (OE). Motivated by the need to move beyond advocacy toward mechanism-focused evidence in developing-country contexts, we implemented a quantitative design comprising a structured questionnaire administered to industry personnel in Lagos (managers, supervisors, and production staff; <i>N</i> = 138) and a complementary public-perception survey of consumers (<i>N</i> = 382). Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) for the firm-side data and descriptive analysis for the consumer data, the results indicate that SCC does not exert a significant direct effect on OE; instead, SCC significantly enhances RUE, which in turn strongly improves OE, thereby validating a mediated SCC→RUE→OE mechanism consistent with the Natural Resource-Based View. Moreover, consumer evidence suggests that sustainability is salient, yet purchase decisions hinge on credible quality assurances, price fairness, hygiene and trust, alongside openness to disposal guidance. Collectively, these findings position resource-utilization efficiency as the transmission channel through which circular capabilities convert environmental intent into operational advantage. They also underscore that such operational gains are most likely to be realized in the market when firms pair efficiency improvements with visible quality signals and clear end-of-life instructions.<i>Implications</i>: The study shows that circular practices improve operations indirectly by improving resource-use efficiency, not through a direct operational effect (SCC → RUE → OE). Managers should therefore focus on strengthening resource-efficiency routines, translate those gains into market value through visible quality assurance and disciplined pricing, provide clear end-of-life guidance, and rely on supportive policies that incentivize waste reduction and better input management.</p>","PeriodicalId":520693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)","volume":" ","pages":"536-547"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2026.2639372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines how supply-chain circularity (SCC) translates into firm performance in Nigeria's synthetic-hair industry by testing a mediated pathway from SCC to resource-utilization efficiency (RUE) and onward to operational efficiency (OE). Motivated by the need to move beyond advocacy toward mechanism-focused evidence in developing-country contexts, we implemented a quantitative design comprising a structured questionnaire administered to industry personnel in Lagos (managers, supervisors, and production staff; N = 138) and a complementary public-perception survey of consumers (N = 382). Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) for the firm-side data and descriptive analysis for the consumer data, the results indicate that SCC does not exert a significant direct effect on OE; instead, SCC significantly enhances RUE, which in turn strongly improves OE, thereby validating a mediated SCC→RUE→OE mechanism consistent with the Natural Resource-Based View. Moreover, consumer evidence suggests that sustainability is salient, yet purchase decisions hinge on credible quality assurances, price fairness, hygiene and trust, alongside openness to disposal guidance. Collectively, these findings position resource-utilization efficiency as the transmission channel through which circular capabilities convert environmental intent into operational advantage. They also underscore that such operational gains are most likely to be realized in the market when firms pair efficiency improvements with visible quality signals and clear end-of-life instructions.Implications: The study shows that circular practices improve operations indirectly by improving resource-use efficiency, not through a direct operational effect (SCC → RUE → OE). Managers should therefore focus on strengthening resource-efficiency routines, translate those gains into market value through visible quality assurance and disciplined pricing, provide clear end-of-life guidance, and rely on supportive policies that incentivize waste reduction and better input management.

供应链循环和公众对合成头发制造的看法:一个案例研究。
本研究通过测试从供应链循环到资源利用效率(RUE)再到运营效率(OE)的中介途径,考察了供应链循环(SCC)如何转化为尼日利亚合成毛发行业的公司绩效。由于需要在发展中国家的背景下从倡导转向以机制为重点的证据,我们实施了一项定量设计,包括对拉各斯行业人员(经理、主管和生产人员;N = 138)进行的结构化问卷调查和对消费者进行的补充性公众认知调查(N = 382)。采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)对企业数据进行分析,对消费者数据进行描述性分析,结果表明SCC对OE没有显著的直接影响;相反,SCC显著增强了RUE,而RUE反过来又有力地提高了OE,从而验证了一个中介的SCC→RUE→OE机制与自然资源基础观点一致。此外,消费者证据表明,可持续性很重要,但购买决定取决于可靠的质量保证、价格公平、卫生和信任,以及对处置指导的开放程度。总的来说,这些发现将资源利用效率定位为循环能力将环境意图转化为运营优势的传输渠道。他们还强调,当公司将效率提高与可见的质量信号和明确的报废说明相结合时,这种运营收益最有可能在市场上实现。启示:研究表明,循环实践通过提高资源利用效率间接改善运营,而不是通过直接的运营效应(SCC→RUE→OE)。因此,管理人员应侧重于加强资源效率惯例,通过可见的质量保证和有纪律的定价将这些收益转化为市场价值,提供明确的寿命结束指导,并依靠鼓励减少废物和改善投入管理的支持性政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书