Updating the critical steps of the quality implementation framework: an umbrella review of reviews.

IF 3.5
Kathrine Hald, Anne Gulbech Ording, Martin Jorsal, Julie Midtgaard, Louise A Ellis, Samantha Spanos, Lisa Pagano, Georgia Fisher, Abraham Wandersman, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Søren Paaske Johnsen
{"title":"Updating the critical steps of the quality implementation framework: an umbrella review of reviews.","authors":"Kathrine Hald, Anne Gulbech Ording, Martin Jorsal, Julie Midtgaard, Louise A Ellis, Samantha Spanos, Lisa Pagano, Georgia Fisher, Abraham Wandersman, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Søren Paaske Johnsen","doi":"10.1186/s43058-026-00954-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Quality Implementation Framework (QIF) is a widely used process model in implementation science (IS). Since its publication in 2012, the field of IS has expanded considerably, yet QIF has never undergone formal revision. Given recent advances and the complexity in implementation research and practice, this study examines whether QIF continues to capture the full scope of implementation quality and its challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An umbrella review of reviews was conducted on literature published between 2012 and 2025. Eligible articles reported on the development, application, or update of implementation frameworks within healthcare or social science. Data were deductively mapped to the four phases and 14 steps of the original QIF and inductively mapped to identify knowledge not included in the original framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 reviews met the inclusion criteria. Most aligned with the core structure of QIF, supporting its continued relevance. However, several reviews highlighted the need to add a pre-implementation phase focusing on evidence appraisal, and a post-implementation phase addressing sustainability. Four cross-cutting domains (service user, intervention deliverer, context, and technology) were identified as critical factors throughout the implementation process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An updated version of QIF is proposed, building on the original framework while introducing two new phases and four cross-cutting domains. This expanded model reflects recent developments in the literature and provides more comprehensive guidance to support implementation across complex real-world settings; it has important implications for implementation research and implementation practice.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023475994.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13242111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-026-00954-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Quality Implementation Framework (QIF) is a widely used process model in implementation science (IS). Since its publication in 2012, the field of IS has expanded considerably, yet QIF has never undergone formal revision. Given recent advances and the complexity in implementation research and practice, this study examines whether QIF continues to capture the full scope of implementation quality and its challenges.

Methods: An umbrella review of reviews was conducted on literature published between 2012 and 2025. Eligible articles reported on the development, application, or update of implementation frameworks within healthcare or social science. Data were deductively mapped to the four phases and 14 steps of the original QIF and inductively mapped to identify knowledge not included in the original framework.

Results: A total of 15 reviews met the inclusion criteria. Most aligned with the core structure of QIF, supporting its continued relevance. However, several reviews highlighted the need to add a pre-implementation phase focusing on evidence appraisal, and a post-implementation phase addressing sustainability. Four cross-cutting domains (service user, intervention deliverer, context, and technology) were identified as critical factors throughout the implementation process.

Conclusions: An updated version of QIF is proposed, building on the original framework while introducing two new phases and four cross-cutting domains. This expanded model reflects recent developments in the literature and provides more comprehensive guidance to support implementation across complex real-world settings; it has important implications for implementation research and implementation practice.

Registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023475994.

更新质量实施框架的关键步骤:审查的总括性审查。
背景:质量实施框架(QIF)是实施科学(is)中应用广泛的过程模型。自2012年发布以来,IS领域已经有了很大的扩展,但QIF从未进行过正式的修订。鉴于最近的进展和实施研究和实践的复杂性,本研究考察了QIF是否继续捕捉实施质量的全部范围及其挑战。方法:对2012 - 2025年间发表的文献进行综述。符合条件的文章报道了医疗保健或社会科学领域实施框架的开发、应用或更新。将数据演绎映射到原QIF的四个阶段和14个步骤,并归纳映射以识别未包含在原框架中的知识。结果:共有15篇综述符合纳入标准。大多数与QIF的核心结构一致,支持其继续发挥作用。然而,一些审查强调需要增加一个侧重于证据评价的执行前阶段和一个解决可持续性问题的执行后阶段。四个交叉领域(服务用户、干预交付者、上下文和技术)被确定为整个实现过程中的关键因素。结论:提出了QIF的更新版本,建立在原始框架的基础上,同时引入了两个新的阶段和四个交叉领域。这个扩展的模型反映了文献中的最新进展,并提供了更全面的指导,以支持在复杂的现实世界环境中实施;这对实施研究和实施实践具有重要意义。注册:普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42023475994。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书