Deep survival learning for prognosis prediction in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-28 DOI:10.1177/14604582261456059
Chunyang Li, Julia Bohman, Vikas Patil, Richard McShinsky, Christina Yong, Zach Burningham, Ahmad Halwani
{"title":"Deep survival learning for prognosis prediction in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.","authors":"Chunyang Li, Julia Bohman, Vikas Patil, Richard McShinsky, Christina Yong, Zach Burningham, Ahmad Halwani","doi":"10.1177/14604582261456059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundNon-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is an advanced state of prostate cancer with variable prognosis; early identification of patient risk is crucial, so that clinicians can recommend optimal treatment.ObjectiveCompare predictive models in identifying patient risk; evaluate the value of electronic healthcare record (EHR) time-series (TS) information in prediction.MethodsWe evaluated SurvTRACE, Weibull Time to Event Recurrent Neural Network (WTTE-RNN), and traditional Cox proportional hazards (CPH) models' performance on EHR data from 12,819 nmCRPC patients in the Veterans Health Administration, using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Brier score.ResultsWTTE-RNN, which intrinsically uses EHR TS information, outperformed the other models without TS information. Feature-engineered TS information improved performances of CPH and especially SurvTRACE; with TS information, SurvTRACE outperformed WTTE-RNN.ConclusionDeep learning methods, whether intrinsically able to handle TS data or enhanced with TS information, can outperform traditional survival analysis in predicting risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"32 2","pages":"14604582261456059"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582261456059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundNon-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is an advanced state of prostate cancer with variable prognosis; early identification of patient risk is crucial, so that clinicians can recommend optimal treatment.ObjectiveCompare predictive models in identifying patient risk; evaluate the value of electronic healthcare record (EHR) time-series (TS) information in prediction.MethodsWe evaluated SurvTRACE, Weibull Time to Event Recurrent Neural Network (WTTE-RNN), and traditional Cox proportional hazards (CPH) models' performance on EHR data from 12,819 nmCRPC patients in the Veterans Health Administration, using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Brier score.ResultsWTTE-RNN, which intrinsically uses EHR TS information, outperformed the other models without TS information. Feature-engineered TS information improved performances of CPH and especially SurvTRACE; with TS information, SurvTRACE outperformed WTTE-RNN.ConclusionDeep learning methods, whether intrinsically able to handle TS data or enhanced with TS information, can outperform traditional survival analysis in predicting risk.

深度生存学习在非转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌预后预测中的应用。
背景:非转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(nmCRPC)是一种预后多变的晚期前列腺癌;早期识别患者风险至关重要,因此临床医生可以推荐最佳治疗方法。目的比较各种预测模型在患者风险识别中的应用;评估电子医疗记录(EHR)时间序列(TS)信息在预测中的价值。方法采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积和Brier评分,评价了SurvTRACE、Weibull Time - to - Event Recurrent Neural Network (wte - rnn)和传统Cox比例风险(CPH)模型对12,819例退伍军人健康管理局nmCRPC患者的EHR数据的表现。结果swtte - rnn本质上使用了EHR的TS信息,优于其他不使用TS信息的模型。特征工程TS信息提高了CPH特别是SurvTRACE的性能;使用TS信息时,SurvTRACE优于WTTE-RNN。结论深度学习方法在预测风险方面优于传统的生存分析方法,无论是本质上能够处理TS数据还是增强了TS信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书