Textbook outcome in surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism: first steps toward a composite quality metric.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Updates in Surgery Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-28 DOI:10.1007/s13304-026-02573-2
Juan José Ruiz-Manzanera, Beatriz Febrero, Natalia Escavy, Miriam Abellán, María Teresa Soriano, Alfonso Aliaga, Inmaculada Ros-Madrid, José M Rodríguez
{"title":"Textbook outcome in surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism: first steps toward a composite quality metric.","authors":"Juan José Ruiz-Manzanera, Beatriz Febrero, Natalia Escavy, Miriam Abellán, María Teresa Soriano, Alfonso Aliaga, Inmaculada Ros-Madrid, José M Rodríguez","doi":"10.1007/s13304-026-02573-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Textbook Outcome (TO) is a composite quality metric reflecting the ideal postoperative course through the simultaneous achievement of multiple desirable endpoints. Although widely explored in other surgical specialties, its application in endocrine surgery remains limited, and has not been specifically assessed in primary parathyroidectomy for sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. A retrospective cohort study was conducted including 100 consecutive patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) between January 2019 and February 2023 at a tertiary endocrine surgery unit. TO was defined by the absence of postoperative complications (wound events, symptomatic hypocalcemia, vocal cord dysfunction), hospital stay ≤ 24 h, histopathological confirmation of parathyroid tissue, absence of 90-day readmission or mortality, biochemical cure at six months, and absence of recurrence at one year. Descriptive and univariate analyses were performed. TO was achieved in 78% of patients. The most frequent reasons for failure were hospital stay longer than 24 h (n = 7) and lack of biochemical cure at six months (n = 7). Most failures (68.2%) were due to a single unmet criterion. In univariate analysis, absence of dyslipidemia (p = 0.016), single-gland resection (p = 0.022), and histopathological confirmation of a solitary adenoma (p = 0.026) were significantly associated with TO achievement. Application of TO to parathyroidectomy for sporadic PHPT proved feasible and informative. The analysis of failures identified prolonged hospitalization and lack of biochemical cure at six months as the most frequent reasons for non-achievement. TO may provide a comprehensive benchmark that complements traditional outcome measures and supports future quality improvement initiatives in endocrine surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2177-2186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13538189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-026-02573-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Textbook Outcome (TO) is a composite quality metric reflecting the ideal postoperative course through the simultaneous achievement of multiple desirable endpoints. Although widely explored in other surgical specialties, its application in endocrine surgery remains limited, and has not been specifically assessed in primary parathyroidectomy for sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. A retrospective cohort study was conducted including 100 consecutive patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) between January 2019 and February 2023 at a tertiary endocrine surgery unit. TO was defined by the absence of postoperative complications (wound events, symptomatic hypocalcemia, vocal cord dysfunction), hospital stay ≤ 24 h, histopathological confirmation of parathyroid tissue, absence of 90-day readmission or mortality, biochemical cure at six months, and absence of recurrence at one year. Descriptive and univariate analyses were performed. TO was achieved in 78% of patients. The most frequent reasons for failure were hospital stay longer than 24 h (n = 7) and lack of biochemical cure at six months (n = 7). Most failures (68.2%) were due to a single unmet criterion. In univariate analysis, absence of dyslipidemia (p = 0.016), single-gland resection (p = 0.022), and histopathological confirmation of a solitary adenoma (p = 0.026) were significantly associated with TO achievement. Application of TO to parathyroidectomy for sporadic PHPT proved feasible and informative. The analysis of failures identified prolonged hospitalization and lack of biochemical cure at six months as the most frequent reasons for non-achievement. TO may provide a comprehensive benchmark that complements traditional outcome measures and supports future quality improvement initiatives in endocrine surgery.

原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进手术的教科书结果:迈向复合质量指标的第一步。
教科书结果(TO)是通过同时达到多个理想终点来反映理想的术后过程的综合质量指标。虽然在其他外科专科得到了广泛的探索,但其在内分泌外科中的应用仍然有限,在散发性原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进的原发性甲状旁腺切除术中尚未得到专门的评估。一项回顾性队列研究纳入了2019年1月至2023年2月在三级内分泌外科单位连续100例因散发性原发性甲状旁腺功能亢(PHPT)接受甲状旁腺切除术的患者。TO的定义为无术后并发症(伤口事件、症状性低钙血症、声带功能障碍)、住院时间≤24小时、甲状旁腺组织的组织病理学证实、90天无再入院或死亡、6个月无生化治愈、1年无复发。进行了描述性和单变量分析。78%的患者达到了TO。最常见的失败原因是住院时间超过24 h (n = 7)和6个月时缺乏生化治愈(n = 7)。大多数失败(68.2%)是由于单一的不符合标准。在单因素分析中,无血脂异常(p = 0.016)、单腺体切除(p = 0.022)和组织病理学证实的单发腺瘤(p = 0.026)与TO的实现显著相关。应用TO治疗散发性PHPT的甲状旁腺切除术是可行的。对失败的分析发现,延长住院时间和6个月时缺乏生化治疗是不成功的最常见原因。TO可以提供一个全面的基准,补充传统的结果测量,并支持未来内分泌外科的质量改进计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书