Measures of Equivalent Hemodialysis Urea Clearance and Their Proposed Utility for Monitoring Adequacy.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Seminars in Dialysis Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-28 DOI:10.1111/sdi.70036
John T Daugirdas
{"title":"Measures of Equivalent Hemodialysis Urea Clearance and Their Proposed Utility for Monitoring Adequacy.","authors":"John T Daugirdas","doi":"10.1111/sdi.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The details of four measures of \"equivalent\" clearances based on urea that have been proposed to monitor hemodialysis adequacy are reviewed. These measures fall into two groups: one based on urea nitrogen generation rate divided by the time-averaged serum urea nitrogen concentration, and the other based on urea nitrogen generation rate divided by the average predialysis serum urea nitrogen concentration. After the original variants were proposed, a potential problem regarding relative weights of dialysis and residual kidney clearances was identified, and revised equivalent urea clearances were proposed that give a higher weight to residual kidney clearance relative to dialysis clearance. These measures suggest that the target dialysis dose should be set to achieve dialysis solute concentrations typically found in patients at the point of needing dialysis, e.g., with a glomerular filtration rate of around 10 mL/min, corresponding to a urea clearance of approximately 6 mL/min and a creatinine clearance of 14. Despite the theoretical attractiveness of equivalent urea clearances to monitor hemodialysis adequacy, their utility has not been conclusively demonstrated in observational studies of incremental or more frequent hemodialysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":21675,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Dialysis","volume":" ","pages":"139-143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13511374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.70036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The details of four measures of "equivalent" clearances based on urea that have been proposed to monitor hemodialysis adequacy are reviewed. These measures fall into two groups: one based on urea nitrogen generation rate divided by the time-averaged serum urea nitrogen concentration, and the other based on urea nitrogen generation rate divided by the average predialysis serum urea nitrogen concentration. After the original variants were proposed, a potential problem regarding relative weights of dialysis and residual kidney clearances was identified, and revised equivalent urea clearances were proposed that give a higher weight to residual kidney clearance relative to dialysis clearance. These measures suggest that the target dialysis dose should be set to achieve dialysis solute concentrations typically found in patients at the point of needing dialysis, e.g., with a glomerular filtration rate of around 10 mL/min, corresponding to a urea clearance of approximately 6 mL/min and a creatinine clearance of 14. Despite the theoretical attractiveness of equivalent urea clearances to monitor hemodialysis adequacy, their utility has not been conclusively demonstrated in observational studies of incremental or more frequent hemodialysis.

等效血液透析尿素清除率的测量及其对充分性监测的建议效用。
本文回顾了四种基于尿素的“等效”清除率指标的细节,这些指标已被提议用于监测血液透析充分性。这些措施分为两组:一组是基于尿素氮生成率除以时间平均血清尿素氮浓度,另一组是基于尿素氮生成率除以透析前平均血清尿素氮浓度。在最初的变异被提出后,一个关于透析和残留肾脏清除率的相对权重的潜在问题被确定,并提出了修订的等效尿素清除率,相对于透析清除率,给予残留肾脏清除率更高的权重。这些措施表明,目标透析剂量应设定为达到透析溶质浓度,例如,肾小球滤过率约为10 mL/min,对应于尿素清除率约为6 mL/min,肌酐清除率为14。尽管理论上等效尿素清除率对监测血液透析充分性具有吸引力,但其效用尚未在渐进式或更频繁的血液透析观察性研究中得到最终证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Dialysis
Seminars in Dialysis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
91
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Dialysis is a bimonthly publication focusing exclusively on cutting-edge clinical aspects of dialysis therapy. Besides publishing papers by the most respected names in the field of dialysis, the Journal has unique useful features, all designed to keep you current: -Fellows Forum -Dialysis rounds -Editorials -Opinions -Briefly noted -Summary and Comment -Guest Edited Issues -Special Articles Virtually everything you read in Seminars in Dialysis is written or solicited by the editors after choosing the most effective of nine different editorial styles and formats. They know that facts, speculations, ''how-to-do-it'' information, opinions, and news reports all play important roles in your education and the patient care you provide. Alternate issues of the journal are guest edited and focus on a single clinical topic in dialysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书