Aspirin Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A 10-year Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedics Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-29 DOI:10.3928/01477447-20260408-01
Regina Chi, Kevin Fox, Brett Ewing, Andrew Nakla, Sean Rajaee
{"title":"Aspirin Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A 10-year Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Regina Chi, Kevin Fox, Brett Ewing, Andrew Nakla, Sean Rajaee","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20260408-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis has been widely studied, comparative data evaluating aspirin versus direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain limited. The study evaluated deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) incidence in patients prescribed aspirin or DOACs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively examined patients undergoing primary TKA at a single academic medical center over a 10-year period. There were 2,232 patients in the aspirin group and 1,638 in the DOAC group. Primary outcome measures include incidence of DVT and PE. A logistic regression model adjusted for differences across groups in relation to the primary outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of PEs (0.4% vs 0.6%, <i>P</i> = .486) and DVTs (1.3% vs 1.4%, <i>P</i> = .780) at 90 days were similar between the aspirin and DOAC groups, respectively. After adjusting for significant covariates in the logistic regression model, there remained no differences in the rate of PE and DVT between groups. The incidence of re-operation (0.4% vs 1.0%) was statistically different (<i>P</i> = .009) between the aspirin and DOAC groups at 90 days, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study revealed no significant differences in the incidence of PE and DVT among patients receiving either DOACs or aspirin following primary TKA. While the rate of reoperation at 90 days was higher in the DOAC group, no differences were observed at 1 year. This study adds to the growing body of evidence demonstrating the safety and efficacy of aspirin for VTE prophylaxis in TKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":"49 3","pages":"e184-e189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20260408-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis has been widely studied, comparative data evaluating aspirin versus direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain limited. The study evaluated deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) incidence in patients prescribed aspirin or DOACs.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively examined patients undergoing primary TKA at a single academic medical center over a 10-year period. There were 2,232 patients in the aspirin group and 1,638 in the DOAC group. Primary outcome measures include incidence of DVT and PE. A logistic regression model adjusted for differences across groups in relation to the primary outcome measures.

Results: The incidence of PEs (0.4% vs 0.6%, P = .486) and DVTs (1.3% vs 1.4%, P = .780) at 90 days were similar between the aspirin and DOAC groups, respectively. After adjusting for significant covariates in the logistic regression model, there remained no differences in the rate of PE and DVT between groups. The incidence of re-operation (0.4% vs 1.0%) was statistically different (P = .009) between the aspirin and DOAC groups at 90 days, respectively.

Conclusion: Our study revealed no significant differences in the incidence of PE and DVT among patients receiving either DOACs or aspirin following primary TKA. While the rate of reoperation at 90 days was higher in the DOAC group, no differences were observed at 1 year. This study adds to the growing body of evidence demonstrating the safety and efficacy of aspirin for VTE prophylaxis in TKA.

阿司匹林与直接口服抗凝剂预防全膝关节置换术后静脉血栓栓塞:一项10年回顾性队列研究。
背景:虽然静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)预防已经被广泛研究,但是评价阿司匹林与直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)在原发性全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的比较数据仍然有限。该研究评估了服用阿司匹林或DOACs的患者的深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和肺栓塞(PE)发生率。材料和方法:我们回顾性调查了在一个学术医疗中心接受原发性TKA的患者,时间跨度超过10年。阿司匹林组有2232例,DOAC组有1638例。主要结局指标包括DVT和PE的发生率。逻辑回归模型调整了各组间与主要结果测量相关的差异。结果:阿司匹林组和DOAC组90天pe (0.4% vs 0.6%, P = 0.486)和dvt (1.3% vs 1.4%, P = 0.780)发生率相似。在逻辑回归模型中调整了显著协变量后,两组之间PE和DVT的发生率仍然没有差异。阿司匹林组和DOAC组90天的再手术发生率(0.4% vs 1.0%)差异有统计学意义(P = 0.009)。结论:我们的研究显示,在原发性TKA后接受DOACs或阿司匹林的患者中,PE和DVT的发生率没有显著差异。虽然DOAC组90天的再手术率较高,但1年无差异。这项研究增加了越来越多的证据,证明阿司匹林对TKA患者静脉血栓栓塞预防的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedics
Orthopedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 40 years, Orthopedics, a bimonthly peer-reviewed journal, has been the preferred choice of orthopedic surgeons for clinically relevant information on all aspects of adult and pediatric orthopedic surgery and treatment. Edited by Robert D''Ambrosia, MD, Chairman of the Department of Orthopedics at the University of Colorado, Denver, and former President of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, as well as an Editorial Board of over 100 international orthopedists, Orthopedics is the source to turn to for guidance in your practice. The journal offers access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content. Highlights also include Blue Ribbon articles published full text in print and online, as well as Tips & Techniques posted with every issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书