Small Femoral Nails and the Development of a Nonunion: A Case-Control Study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedics Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-29 DOI:10.3928/01477447-20260429-02
Jordan Brand, Meghan Hughes, Kristin E Turner, Joshua E Lawrence, Murali Kovvur, Mark J Gage, Jason W Nascone, Marcus F Sciadini, Nathan N O'Hara, Robert V O'Toole
{"title":"Small Femoral Nails and the Development of a Nonunion: A Case-Control Study.","authors":"Jordan Brand, Meghan Hughes, Kristin E Turner, Joshua E Lawrence, Murali Kovvur, Mark J Gage, Jason W Nascone, Marcus F Sciadini, Nathan N O'Hara, Robert V O'Toole","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20260429-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Locked intramedullary (IM) nails are the primary treatment modality for femoral shaft fractures. This study aimed to determine the risk of developing a femur nonunion as a function of nail-to-bone diameter mismatch.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective case-control study was performed at a Level I trauma center. Adult patients with femoral shaft fractures (AO/OTA 32 classification) treated with IM nail fixation from 2016 to 2022 were identified from the institutional database. Cases required nonunion surgery. Controls were randomly selected in a 3:1 ratio and included only if fractures healed at final follow-up based on the modified Radiographic Union Score of the femur (mRUSF). The primary outcome was nonunion. The study compared the association of nonunion with nail diameter (range, 9 mm to 13 mm) relative to femur width (range, 12 mm to 36 mm) and adjusted for smoking status, open fracture, and the degree of comminution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 203 patients were included: 50 cases and 153 controls. Patients with a femur anterior-to-posterior diameter >22 mm at the level of the lesser trochanter (11% of this sample) were at increased odds for nonunion when treated with a small diameter IM nail (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.7; <i>P</i> = .01). In patients with narrower femur diameters, the nail diameter was not associated with increased odds of nonunion surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Larger IM nails (≥11 mm) might have protected against nonunion in patients with wide femoral canals (≥22 mm) but likely conferred no significant benefit in patients with narrower femoral canals.</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":"49 3","pages":"e229-e234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20260429-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Locked intramedullary (IM) nails are the primary treatment modality for femoral shaft fractures. This study aimed to determine the risk of developing a femur nonunion as a function of nail-to-bone diameter mismatch.

Materials and methods: A retrospective case-control study was performed at a Level I trauma center. Adult patients with femoral shaft fractures (AO/OTA 32 classification) treated with IM nail fixation from 2016 to 2022 were identified from the institutional database. Cases required nonunion surgery. Controls were randomly selected in a 3:1 ratio and included only if fractures healed at final follow-up based on the modified Radiographic Union Score of the femur (mRUSF). The primary outcome was nonunion. The study compared the association of nonunion with nail diameter (range, 9 mm to 13 mm) relative to femur width (range, 12 mm to 36 mm) and adjusted for smoking status, open fracture, and the degree of comminution.

Results: In total, 203 patients were included: 50 cases and 153 controls. Patients with a femur anterior-to-posterior diameter >22 mm at the level of the lesser trochanter (11% of this sample) were at increased odds for nonunion when treated with a small diameter IM nail (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.7; P = .01). In patients with narrower femur diameters, the nail diameter was not associated with increased odds of nonunion surgery.

Conclusion: Larger IM nails (≥11 mm) might have protected against nonunion in patients with wide femoral canals (≥22 mm) but likely conferred no significant benefit in patients with narrower femoral canals.

股骨小钉与骨不连的发展:一项病例对照研究。
背景与目的:锁定髓内钉是股骨干骨折的主要治疗方式。本研究旨在确定发生股骨不愈合的风险与钉骨直径不匹配的关系。材料和方法:在一家一级创伤中心进行回顾性病例对照研究。从机构数据库中确定2016年至2022年采用IM钉固定治疗的成年股骨干骨折患者(AO/OTA 32分类)。病例需要手术治疗。对照组按3:1的比例随机选择,仅在最终随访时骨折愈合时根据改良的股骨放射学联合评分(mRUSF)纳入对照组。主要结果是骨不连。该研究比较了骨不连与钉直径(范围,9毫米至13毫米)相对于股骨宽度(范围,12毫米至36毫米)的关系,并根据吸烟状况、开放性骨折和粉碎程度进行了调整。结果:共纳入203例患者,其中病例50例,对照组153例。在小转子水平,股骨前后直径为bbb22 mm的患者(占该样本的11%)在使用小直径IM钉治疗时发生骨不连的几率增加(优势比[OR], 2.1; 95%可信区间[CI], 1.2-3.7; P = 0.01)。在股骨直径较窄的患者中,钉直径与手术不愈合的几率增加无关。结论:较大的IM钉(≥11 mm)可能对股骨管宽(≥22 mm)患者的骨不连有保护作用,但对股骨管窄的患者可能没有显著的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedics
Orthopedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 40 years, Orthopedics, a bimonthly peer-reviewed journal, has been the preferred choice of orthopedic surgeons for clinically relevant information on all aspects of adult and pediatric orthopedic surgery and treatment. Edited by Robert D''Ambrosia, MD, Chairman of the Department of Orthopedics at the University of Colorado, Denver, and former President of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, as well as an Editorial Board of over 100 international orthopedists, Orthopedics is the source to turn to for guidance in your practice. The journal offers access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content. Highlights also include Blue Ribbon articles published full text in print and online, as well as Tips & Techniques posted with every issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书