Kellen T Krajewski, Madeline Hornfeck, Julia S Sanders
{"title":"A Modified Keshishyan Index Demonstrates Three-dimensional Assessment of Asymmetry in Pediatric Pelvic Fractures.","authors":"Kellen T Krajewski, Madeline Hornfeck, Julia S Sanders","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20260519-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthopedic surgeons use a combination of plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) to diagnose and manage pelvic ring injuries. Historically, pelvic ring asymmetry has been calculated using the Keshishyan index (KI) measured in 2 dimensions. Three-dimensional (3D) CT modeling may assess deformity more comprehensively, aiding in treatment decisions. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of a modified KI (MKI) derived from 3D models of pediatric patients with pelvic fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two separate raters identified landmarks 3 separate times on 29 generated models. Traditional KI (TKI) was calculated using the contralateral distance between the most anterior portion of the sacroiliac joint (SAAS) and the deepest point of the acetabulum. The MKI used the contralateral distance between the SAAS and pubic tubercle. KI was calculated on correlating radiographs (RxKI). Bland-Altman analyses and intra-/interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to evaluate agreement between measurement methods and reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RxKI and TKI measurements exhibited similar agreement with a mean bias (MB) of -0.0205. RxKI and MKI had a MB of 0.0012, and TKI and MKI had a MB of 0.0210. TKI reliability ranged from good to excellent (Intra = 0.923, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.892-0.947; Inter = 0.897, 95% CI, 0.852-0.928), and MKI reliability was excellent (Intra = 0.938, 95% CI, 0.911-0.959; Inter = 0.912, 95% CI, 0.876-0.937).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All methods exhibited excellent reliability, with MKI having the highest ICCs. MKI provided similar, reproducible values compared with RxKI, suggesting that clinicians can compare pelvic asymmetry values between CT and radiograph images.</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":"49 3","pages":"e242-e247"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20260519-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Orthopedic surgeons use a combination of plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) to diagnose and manage pelvic ring injuries. Historically, pelvic ring asymmetry has been calculated using the Keshishyan index (KI) measured in 2 dimensions. Three-dimensional (3D) CT modeling may assess deformity more comprehensively, aiding in treatment decisions. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of a modified KI (MKI) derived from 3D models of pediatric patients with pelvic fractures.
Materials and methods: Two separate raters identified landmarks 3 separate times on 29 generated models. Traditional KI (TKI) was calculated using the contralateral distance between the most anterior portion of the sacroiliac joint (SAAS) and the deepest point of the acetabulum. The MKI used the contralateral distance between the SAAS and pubic tubercle. KI was calculated on correlating radiographs (RxKI). Bland-Altman analyses and intra-/interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to evaluate agreement between measurement methods and reliability.
Results: RxKI and TKI measurements exhibited similar agreement with a mean bias (MB) of -0.0205. RxKI and MKI had a MB of 0.0012, and TKI and MKI had a MB of 0.0210. TKI reliability ranged from good to excellent (Intra = 0.923, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.892-0.947; Inter = 0.897, 95% CI, 0.852-0.928), and MKI reliability was excellent (Intra = 0.938, 95% CI, 0.911-0.959; Inter = 0.912, 95% CI, 0.876-0.937).
Conclusion: All methods exhibited excellent reliability, with MKI having the highest ICCs. MKI provided similar, reproducible values compared with RxKI, suggesting that clinicians can compare pelvic asymmetry values between CT and radiograph images.
期刊介绍:
For over 40 years, Orthopedics, a bimonthly peer-reviewed journal, has been the preferred choice of orthopedic surgeons for clinically relevant information on all aspects of adult and pediatric orthopedic surgery and treatment. Edited by Robert D''Ambrosia, MD, Chairman of the Department of Orthopedics at the University of Colorado, Denver, and former President of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, as well as an Editorial Board of over 100 international orthopedists, Orthopedics is the source to turn to for guidance in your practice.
The journal offers access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content. Highlights also include Blue Ribbon articles published full text in print and online, as well as Tips & Techniques posted with every issue.