Planned Versus Intraoperative Vascular Surgery Consultations in Orthopedic Oncology.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedics Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-29 DOI:10.3928/01477447-20260423-01
Dylan J Riley, Zachary R Butler, Samuel Alfonsi, Kayla Kupietzky, Michele Richard, Alan T Blank
{"title":"Planned Versus Intraoperative Vascular Surgery Consultations in Orthopedic Oncology.","authors":"Dylan J Riley, Zachary R Butler, Samuel Alfonsi, Kayla Kupietzky, Michele Richard, Alan T Blank","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20260423-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Orthopedic oncology surgeries frequently involve complex resections where critical neurovascular structures are at risk, and vascular injury can result in severe complications, including functional loss and mortality. Although multidisciplinary vascular collaboration is increasingly recognized as beneficial in oncologic surgery, limited evidence exists regarding optimal timing of vascular surgery consultation in orthopedic oncology. This study evaluated whether preoperative planned consultations improve intraoperative and postoperative outcomes compared to intraoperative consultations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review identified 30 patients who underwent orthopedic oncology surgery requiring vascular surgery involvement between 2015 and 2025 at a single academic institution. Patients were categorized into planned vascular consultations (n = 18) and intraoperative consultations (n = 12). Data collection included demographics, operative details, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, and type of vascular intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intra-operative consultation group experienced significantly higher median EBL (1,225 mL vs 325 mL, <i>P</i> = .015). Additionally, intraoperative consultations demonstrated trends toward longer operative times (307 vs 185.5 minutes) and higher postoperative complication rates. Infections occurred in 42% of intraoperative cases compared to 17% of planned cases. One intraoperative patient also experienced cardiac arrest, and another developed deep vein thrombosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Planned vascular surgery consultations are associated with significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss and trend toward improved operative efficiency and fewer postoperative complications. This is the first study directly comparing outcomes between planned and intraoperative vascular consultations in orthopedic oncology. Early vascular involvement enables better anticipation of vascular challenges and supports proactive multidisciplinary collaboration to enhance patient safety and optimize resource use.</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":"49 3","pages":"e190-e196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20260423-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Orthopedic oncology surgeries frequently involve complex resections where critical neurovascular structures are at risk, and vascular injury can result in severe complications, including functional loss and mortality. Although multidisciplinary vascular collaboration is increasingly recognized as beneficial in oncologic surgery, limited evidence exists regarding optimal timing of vascular surgery consultation in orthopedic oncology. This study evaluated whether preoperative planned consultations improve intraoperative and postoperative outcomes compared to intraoperative consultations.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review identified 30 patients who underwent orthopedic oncology surgery requiring vascular surgery involvement between 2015 and 2025 at a single academic institution. Patients were categorized into planned vascular consultations (n = 18) and intraoperative consultations (n = 12). Data collection included demographics, operative details, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, and type of vascular intervention.

Results: The intra-operative consultation group experienced significantly higher median EBL (1,225 mL vs 325 mL, P = .015). Additionally, intraoperative consultations demonstrated trends toward longer operative times (307 vs 185.5 minutes) and higher postoperative complication rates. Infections occurred in 42% of intraoperative cases compared to 17% of planned cases. One intraoperative patient also experienced cardiac arrest, and another developed deep vein thrombosis.

Conclusion: Planned vascular surgery consultations are associated with significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss and trend toward improved operative efficiency and fewer postoperative complications. This is the first study directly comparing outcomes between planned and intraoperative vascular consultations in orthopedic oncology. Early vascular involvement enables better anticipation of vascular challenges and supports proactive multidisciplinary collaboration to enhance patient safety and optimize resource use.

骨科肿瘤学中计划与术中血管手术会诊。
背景和目的:骨科肿瘤手术经常涉及复杂的切除,其中关键的神经血管结构处于危险之中,血管损伤可导致严重的并发症,包括功能丧失和死亡。尽管多学科血管合作在肿瘤手术中越来越被认为是有益的,但关于骨科肿瘤血管手术咨询的最佳时机的证据有限。本研究评估与术中咨询相比,术前计划咨询是否能改善术中和术后结果。材料和方法:一项回顾性研究确定了2015年至2025年间在单一学术机构接受骨科肿瘤手术需要血管手术的30例患者。患者分为计划血管会诊(n = 18)和术中会诊(n = 12)。数据收集包括人口统计学、手术细节、估计失血量(EBL)、并发症和血管干预类型。结果:术中会诊组患者EBL中位数明显增高(1225 mL vs 325 mL, P = 0.015)。此外,术中会诊显示出更长的手术时间(307 vs 185.5分钟)和更高的术后并发症发生率。42%的术中病例发生感染,而计划病例的感染发生率为17%。术中1例患者出现心脏骤停,另1例发生深静脉血栓。结论:有计划的血管手术会诊可显著减少术中出血量,并有提高手术效率和减少术后并发症的趋势。这是第一个直接比较骨科肿瘤学计划和术中血管会诊结果的研究。早期血管介入可以更好地预测血管挑战,并支持积极的多学科合作,以提高患者安全并优化资源利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedics
Orthopedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 40 years, Orthopedics, a bimonthly peer-reviewed journal, has been the preferred choice of orthopedic surgeons for clinically relevant information on all aspects of adult and pediatric orthopedic surgery and treatment. Edited by Robert D''Ambrosia, MD, Chairman of the Department of Orthopedics at the University of Colorado, Denver, and former President of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, as well as an Editorial Board of over 100 international orthopedists, Orthopedics is the source to turn to for guidance in your practice. The journal offers access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content. Highlights also include Blue Ribbon articles published full text in print and online, as well as Tips & Techniques posted with every issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书