Sex-associated variables – A framework for neurotoxicology

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Neurotoxicology Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-26 DOI:10.1016/j.neuro.2026.103475
Cameron P. Hamson , Morgan L. Atkinson , Troy A. Roepke
{"title":"Sex-associated variables – A framework for neurotoxicology","authors":"Cameron P. Hamson ,&nbsp;Morgan L. Atkinson ,&nbsp;Troy A. Roepke","doi":"10.1016/j.neuro.2026.103475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the implementation of ‘sex as a biological variable’ policies have been enacted across the world, the study of sex differences or comparisons across the sexes has steadily increased. In the field of neurotoxicology, the study of sex-dependent variability is necessary due to the plastic nature of the brain and the response to factors that influence this variability such as gonadal hormones and sex chromosomal complement. The phrase ‘sex differences’ is not inherently wrong, but it is an underdefined generalization that creates a distinct binary. While this binary is reductive at best, it creates the expectation of direct comparison and therefore a standard of the two groups when sex is a spectrum containing a mosaic of factors. The generalization of sex to one, often undefined, factor reduces the rigor of the research and overlooks potential variability both within and between sexes. This review provides a guide to help break down sex differences into a conglomeration of variables that can then be assessed for differences. By examining the mechanisms underlying sex difference, research can also be applied to groups and individuals who do not fit into the prescribed binary. People with chromosomal differences, cisgender atypical endocrine profiles, and transgender, nonbinary, and gender diverse (TNG) individuals should have research that can be tailored to their unique experiences and provide additional insight as to how a particular drug or toxicant can impact them in a way that may not be a predicted response based on the binary of male and female.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19189,"journal":{"name":"Neurotoxicology","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 103475"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161813X26000963","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the implementation of ‘sex as a biological variable’ policies have been enacted across the world, the study of sex differences or comparisons across the sexes has steadily increased. In the field of neurotoxicology, the study of sex-dependent variability is necessary due to the plastic nature of the brain and the response to factors that influence this variability such as gonadal hormones and sex chromosomal complement. The phrase ‘sex differences’ is not inherently wrong, but it is an underdefined generalization that creates a distinct binary. While this binary is reductive at best, it creates the expectation of direct comparison and therefore a standard of the two groups when sex is a spectrum containing a mosaic of factors. The generalization of sex to one, often undefined, factor reduces the rigor of the research and overlooks potential variability both within and between sexes. This review provides a guide to help break down sex differences into a conglomeration of variables that can then be assessed for differences. By examining the mechanisms underlying sex difference, research can also be applied to groups and individuals who do not fit into the prescribed binary. People with chromosomal differences, cisgender atypical endocrine profiles, and transgender, nonbinary, and gender diverse (TNG) individuals should have research that can be tailored to their unique experiences and provide additional insight as to how a particular drug or toxicant can impact them in a way that may not be a predicted response based on the binary of male and female.
性别相关变量-神经毒理学框架。
随着“性别作为生物变量”政策在世界范围内的实施,对性别差异或性别比较的研究稳步增加。在神经毒理学领域,由于大脑的可塑性以及对影响这种变异性的因素(如性腺激素和性染色体补体)的反应,性别依赖性变异性的研究是必要的。“性别差异”这个词本身并没有错,但它是一种定义不明确的概括,造成了明显的二元对立。虽然这种二元性充其量是简化的,但它创造了直接比较的期望,因此当性别是一个包含各种因素的光谱时,它就成为了两个群体的标准。将性别概括为一个因素,往往不明确,降低了研究的严谨性,并忽视了性别内部和性别之间的潜在差异。这篇综述提供了一个指南,帮助将性别差异分解为一系列变量,然后对差异进行评估。通过检查性别差异背后的机制,研究也可以应用于不符合规定的二元性的群体和个人。有染色体差异、顺性非典型内分泌特征、跨性别、非二元性和性别多样化(TNG)个体的人应该有针对他们独特经历的研究,并提供额外的见解,以了解特定药物或毒物如何以一种可能不是基于男性和女性二元性的预测反应的方式影响他们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurotoxicology
Neurotoxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
161
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: NeuroToxicology specializes in publishing the best peer-reviewed original research papers dealing with the effects of toxic substances on the nervous system of humans and experimental animals of all ages. The Journal emphasizes papers dealing with the neurotoxic effects of environmentally significant chemical hazards, manufactured drugs and naturally occurring compounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书