Incidence of Adverse Events with Prehospital Use of Droperidol for Nausea or Vomiting.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Aleksander W Keller, Michael P Galie, Benjamin J Miller, Christian Martin-Gill
{"title":"Incidence of Adverse Events with Prehospital Use of Droperidol for Nausea or Vomiting.","authors":"Aleksander W Keller, Michael P Galie, Benjamin J Miller, Christian Martin-Gill","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2026.2677850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In 2019, droperidol was re-introduced for the treatment of nausea or agitation among emergency medical services (EMS) agencies. Despite a reduced dose used for nausea/vomiting compared to agitation, patients may still experience unwanted sedation. Some protocols recommend an even lower dose for certain patients, such as older adults (age ≥65 years), to avoid oversedation. However, there are limited data to support this practice. We aimed to identify the incidence of adverse events following the use of droperidol for nausea and vomiting and secondarily whether older patients had an increased likelihood of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective observational cohort study of a convenience sample of patients treated by 29 EMS agencies for nausea/vomiting with droperidol and transport to one of 9 hospitals between March 2022 and December 2023. We identified the incidence of adverse events including hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90mmHg), hypoventilation (respiratory rate <10 or end tidal carbon dioxide >50mmgHg), hypoxia (pulse oximetry <90% or need for supplemental oxygen), or decreased mental status (GCS <15) either prehospital or in the emergency department. Additionally, we performed a multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association of adverse events with older age, controlling for sex, weight, route of administration, and if any other sedative was given.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 284 cases were included and most (90.1%) received a dose of 1.25 mg. At least one adverse event was experienced by 44 (15.5%) patients, most commonly decreased mentation (GCS <15; <i>n</i> = 24, 8.5%). Hypoxia was experienced by 19 (6.7%) patients, mostly in older adults (<i>n</i> = 12, 13.2%) while hypotension or hypoventilation was experienced by <5%. In multivariable analysis, older patients had a similar odds of adverse events compared to other adults (OR 1.79, 95% CI 0.91-3.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified an adverse event in about 15% of prehospital patients receiving droperidol for nausea and vomiting, most commonly mild sedation, with very limited serious adverse events. Incidence of sedation was similar among older patients and other adults. Further investigation is warranted to evaluate effectiveness versus adverse events with different droperidol doses and compared to other antiemetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2026.2677850","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In 2019, droperidol was re-introduced for the treatment of nausea or agitation among emergency medical services (EMS) agencies. Despite a reduced dose used for nausea/vomiting compared to agitation, patients may still experience unwanted sedation. Some protocols recommend an even lower dose for certain patients, such as older adults (age ≥65 years), to avoid oversedation. However, there are limited data to support this practice. We aimed to identify the incidence of adverse events following the use of droperidol for nausea and vomiting and secondarily whether older patients had an increased likelihood of adverse events.

Methods: We performed a retrospective observational cohort study of a convenience sample of patients treated by 29 EMS agencies for nausea/vomiting with droperidol and transport to one of 9 hospitals between March 2022 and December 2023. We identified the incidence of adverse events including hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90mmHg), hypoventilation (respiratory rate <10 or end tidal carbon dioxide >50mmgHg), hypoxia (pulse oximetry <90% or need for supplemental oxygen), or decreased mental status (GCS <15) either prehospital or in the emergency department. Additionally, we performed a multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association of adverse events with older age, controlling for sex, weight, route of administration, and if any other sedative was given.

Results: A total of 284 cases were included and most (90.1%) received a dose of 1.25 mg. At least one adverse event was experienced by 44 (15.5%) patients, most commonly decreased mentation (GCS <15; n = 24, 8.5%). Hypoxia was experienced by 19 (6.7%) patients, mostly in older adults (n = 12, 13.2%) while hypotension or hypoventilation was experienced by <5%. In multivariable analysis, older patients had a similar odds of adverse events compared to other adults (OR 1.79, 95% CI 0.91-3.51).

Conclusions: We identified an adverse event in about 15% of prehospital patients receiving droperidol for nausea and vomiting, most commonly mild sedation, with very limited serious adverse events. Incidence of sedation was similar among older patients and other adults. Further investigation is warranted to evaluate effectiveness versus adverse events with different droperidol doses and compared to other antiemetics.

院前使用氟哌啶醇治疗恶心或呕吐的不良事件发生率。
目的:2019年,在紧急医疗服务(EMS)机构中,氟哌啶醇被重新引入治疗恶心或躁动。尽管与躁动相比,用于恶心/呕吐的剂量减少,但患者仍可能经历不必要的镇静。一些方案建议对某些患者使用更低的剂量,如老年人(年龄≥65岁),以避免过度镇静。然而,支持这种做法的数据有限。我们的目的是确定使用氟哌啶醇治疗恶心和呕吐后不良事件的发生率,其次是老年患者不良事件的可能性是否增加。方法:我们对29家EMS机构在2022年3月至2023年12月期间使用氟哌啶醇治疗恶心/呕吐并转移到9家医院之一的患者进行了回顾性观察队列研究。我们确定了不良事件的发生率,包括低血压(收缩压50mmgHg)、缺氧(脉搏血氧测定)。结果:共纳入284例,大多数(90.1%)接受1.25 mg的剂量。44例(15.5%)患者至少经历了一次不良事件,最常见的是精神状态下降(GCS)。结论:我们发现约15%的院前患者因恶心和呕吐而接受氟哌啶醇治疗,最常见的是轻度镇静,严重不良事件非常有限。老年患者和其他成人的镇静发生率相似。需要进一步的研究来评估不同氟哌啶醇剂量的有效性和不良事件,并与其他止吐药进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书