Circulating immune cell biomarkers in Psoriatic Arthritis: associations with clinical manifestations and treatment response in the TOFA-PREDICT trial.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
F T Perton, J N Pouw, J Spierings, D N Kors, A N Concepcion, C P J Bekker, H E Vonkeman, S C Mooij, L G Schipper, A Herman, S A Vreugdenhil, S C Mastbergen, P M J Welsing
{"title":"Circulating immune cell biomarkers in Psoriatic Arthritis: associations with clinical manifestations and treatment response in the TOFA-PREDICT trial.","authors":"F T Perton, J N Pouw, J Spierings, D N Kors, A N Concepcion, C P J Bekker, H E Vonkeman, S C Mooij, L G Schipper, A Herman, S A Vreugdenhil, S C Mastbergen, P M J Welsing","doi":"10.1186/s13075-026-03833-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the associations of circulating immune cell biomarkers with clinical manifestations and treatment response in Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA), and to evaluate whether these biomarkers improve prediction of individual response to tofacitinib, methotrexate, or etanercept.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the TOFA-PREDICT development cohort (n = 80) were used. DMARD naïve patients were randomized to tofacitinib or methotrexate, and csDMARD inadequate responders were randomized to tofacitinib or etanercept. Treatment response (achievement of Minimal Disease Activity) was scored at week 16. Clinical data and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed at baseline and week 16. Relevant biomarkers for clinical manifestations or treatment response were selected using sparse partial least squares (sPLS) regression and extreme gradient boosting. Associations with PsA clinical manifestations were analyzed using multivariate linear regression. Biomarker profiles for treatment response were derived by sPLS regression. Lastly, a Ridge regression model was used to evaluate whether selected biomarkers improved the prediction of individual treatment response beyond a previously developed clinical model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The biomarkers explained up to 27% and 11% of observed variance for psoriasis severity and the swollen joint count, respectively. Baseline biomarker profiles classified etanercept and methotrexate responders relatively well, but did not distinguish tofacitinib responders. Adding biomarker data to clinical data did not improve the accuracy of individual response prediction (AUC-ROC 0.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our comprehensive set of circulating immune cell biomarkers showed no additional value in precision medicine, when added to clinical predictors. However, the observed associations provide relevant insights into pathophysiological mechanisms underlying differential treatment response and clinical manifestations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>EudraCT Trial registration number 2017-003900-28, registration date January 25th 2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":8419,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Research & Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13397704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-026-03833-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To investigate the associations of circulating immune cell biomarkers with clinical manifestations and treatment response in Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA), and to evaluate whether these biomarkers improve prediction of individual response to tofacitinib, methotrexate, or etanercept.

Methods: Data from the TOFA-PREDICT development cohort (n = 80) were used. DMARD naïve patients were randomized to tofacitinib or methotrexate, and csDMARD inadequate responders were randomized to tofacitinib or etanercept. Treatment response (achievement of Minimal Disease Activity) was scored at week 16. Clinical data and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed at baseline and week 16. Relevant biomarkers for clinical manifestations or treatment response were selected using sparse partial least squares (sPLS) regression and extreme gradient boosting. Associations with PsA clinical manifestations were analyzed using multivariate linear regression. Biomarker profiles for treatment response were derived by sPLS regression. Lastly, a Ridge regression model was used to evaluate whether selected biomarkers improved the prediction of individual treatment response beyond a previously developed clinical model.

Results: The biomarkers explained up to 27% and 11% of observed variance for psoriasis severity and the swollen joint count, respectively. Baseline biomarker profiles classified etanercept and methotrexate responders relatively well, but did not distinguish tofacitinib responders. Adding biomarker data to clinical data did not improve the accuracy of individual response prediction (AUC-ROC 0.74).

Conclusion: Our comprehensive set of circulating immune cell biomarkers showed no additional value in precision medicine, when added to clinical predictors. However, the observed associations provide relevant insights into pathophysiological mechanisms underlying differential treatment response and clinical manifestations.

Trial registration: EudraCT Trial registration number 2017-003900-28, registration date January 25th 2018.

银屑病关节炎的循环免疫细胞生物标志物:TOFA-PREDICT试验中与临床表现和治疗反应的关系
背景:研究循环免疫细胞生物标志物与银屑病关节炎(PsA)临床表现和治疗反应的关系,并评估这些生物标志物是否能改善对托法替尼、甲氨蝶呤或依那西普的个体反应预测。方法:使用来自TOFA-PREDICT发展队列(n = 80)的数据。DMARD naïve患者随机接受托法替尼或甲氨蝶呤治疗,csDMARD不良反应者随机接受托法替尼或依那西普治疗。治疗反应(达到最小疾病活动度)在第16周进行评分。在基线和第16周分析临床资料和外周血单核细胞。使用稀疏偏最小二乘(sPLS)回归和极端梯度增强选择与临床表现或治疗反应相关的生物标志物。采用多元线性回归分析与PsA临床表现的关系。通过sPLS回归得出治疗反应的生物标志物谱。最后,使用Ridge回归模型来评估所选生物标志物是否比先前开发的临床模型更好地预测了个体治疗反应。结果:生物标志物分别解释了27%和11%的牛皮癣严重程度和肿胀关节计数的观察差异。基线生物标志物对依那西普和甲氨蝶呤应答者的分类相对较好,但对法替替尼应答者没有区分。将生物标志物数据加入临床数据并没有提高个体反应预测的准确性(AUC-ROC 0.74)。结论:我们的综合循环免疫细胞生物标志物在精准医疗中没有额外的价值,当添加到临床预测指标中时。然而,观察到的关联为不同治疗反应和临床表现的病理生理机制提供了相关的见解。试验注册:EudraCT试验注册号为2017-003900-28,注册日期为2018年1月25日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1999, Arthritis Research and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed journal, publishing original articles in the area of musculoskeletal research and therapy as well as, reviews, commentaries and reports. A major focus of the journal is on the immunologic processes leading to inflammation, damage and repair as they relate to autoimmune rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions, and which inform the translation of this knowledge into advances in clinical care. Original basic, translational and clinical research is considered for publication along with results of early and late phase therapeutic trials, especially as they pertain to the underpinning science that informs clinical observations in interventional studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书