Advance care planning in the Asia Pacific region: comparative implementation study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Raymond Ng Han Lip, Masanori Mori, Cheng-Pei Lin, Craig Sinclair, Trudy Giam, Joyce Chee, Josephine M Clayton, Sang-Yeon Suh, Diah Martina, Sayaka Takenouchi, Sun Hyun Kim, Shao-Yi Cheng, Ping-Jen Chen, Sumytra Menon, Kwok-Keung Yuen, Helen Chan, Annie Kwok, Yoshiyuki Kizawa
{"title":"Advance care planning in the Asia Pacific region: comparative implementation study.","authors":"Raymond Ng Han Lip, Masanori Mori, Cheng-Pei Lin, Craig Sinclair, Trudy Giam, Joyce Chee, Josephine M Clayton, Sang-Yeon Suh, Diah Martina, Sayaka Takenouchi, Sun Hyun Kim, Shao-Yi Cheng, Ping-Jen Chen, Sumytra Menon, Kwok-Keung Yuen, Helen Chan, Annie Kwok, Yoshiyuki Kizawa","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2026-006110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is a lack of understanding of the landscape of advance care planning (ACP) in the Asia Pacific, and to our knowledge, no previous comparative study has been performed. This study sets out to map the current landscape of ACP implementation across member sectors within the Asia Pacific Hospice Palliative Care Network (APHN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional survey of purposively sampled experts and leaders, with at least 5 years of experience in ACP-related practice, from the member sectors of APHN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is a rich diversity of approaches to ACP implementation, including its conceptualisation, time of initiation and accessibility across various sectors in the Asia Pacific region. The implementation of ACP as a national or organisational programme is associated with increased perceptions of its uptake and accessibility, particularly within Taiwan, New Zealand and Singapore. In some Asian sectors such as in Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, South Korea, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Vietnam, a more family-led ACP process exists, even if the patient has capacity to make healthcare decisions. Most sectors reported top barriers to ACP as a lack of public awareness (9 out of 15 sectors) and lack of empowerment of healthcare professionals (13 out of 15 sectors) as well as social taboo (11 out of 15 sectors).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>National and organisational support for the ACP process, cultural competency in ACP and engagement efforts to raise awareness and address barriers to ACP are important considerations in ACP implementation in the Asia Pacific.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"879-888"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2026-006110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: There is a lack of understanding of the landscape of advance care planning (ACP) in the Asia Pacific, and to our knowledge, no previous comparative study has been performed. This study sets out to map the current landscape of ACP implementation across member sectors within the Asia Pacific Hospice Palliative Care Network (APHN).

Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey of purposively sampled experts and leaders, with at least 5 years of experience in ACP-related practice, from the member sectors of APHN.

Results: There is a rich diversity of approaches to ACP implementation, including its conceptualisation, time of initiation and accessibility across various sectors in the Asia Pacific region. The implementation of ACP as a national or organisational programme is associated with increased perceptions of its uptake and accessibility, particularly within Taiwan, New Zealand and Singapore. In some Asian sectors such as in Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, South Korea, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Vietnam, a more family-led ACP process exists, even if the patient has capacity to make healthcare decisions. Most sectors reported top barriers to ACP as a lack of public awareness (9 out of 15 sectors) and lack of empowerment of healthcare professionals (13 out of 15 sectors) as well as social taboo (11 out of 15 sectors).

Conclusions: National and organisational support for the ACP process, cultural competency in ACP and engagement efforts to raise awareness and address barriers to ACP are important considerations in ACP implementation in the Asia Pacific.

亚太地区的提前护理计划:比较实施研究。
目的:在亚太地区,人们对预先护理计划(ACP)的现状缺乏了解,据我们所知,此前没有进行过比较研究。本研究旨在描绘亚太安宁疗护缓和疗护网路(APHN)各成员部门实施ACP的现况。方法:对APHN成员部门中具有至少5年acp相关实践经验的专家和领导进行横断面调查。结果:亚太地区实施ACP的方法多种多样,包括概念化、启动时间和各部门的可及性。ACP作为一项国家或组织方案的实施与对其吸收和可及性的认识增加有关,特别是在台湾、新西兰和新加坡。在一些亚洲地区,如香港、印度、印度尼西亚、韩国、马来西亚、斯里兰卡、泰国和越南,即使患者有能力做出医疗保健决定,也存在更多以家庭为主导的ACP流程。大多数行业报告说,实施非加太计划的最大障碍是缺乏公众意识(15个行业中有9个)、保健专业人员缺乏授权(15个行业中有13个)以及社会禁忌(15个行业中有11个)。结论:国家和组织对非加太进程的支持、非加太的文化能力以及提高认识和解决障碍的参与努力是在亚太地区实施非加太的重要考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书