Comparison of three arm-positioning techniques for minimizing motion artifacts in breast magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective volunteer study.

IF 2.9
Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-26 DOI:10.1007/s12282-026-01860-5
Norikazu Koori, Minami Suzuki, Nobukiyo Yoshida, Shohei Yamamoto, Shin Miyakawa, Kota Sasaki, Hiroki Nosaka, Kenji Yasue, Masato Takahashi, Koichi Hanada, Hajime Ichikawa, Kazuyuki Sumi, Kazuya Takeda, Hiraku Fuse
{"title":"Comparison of three arm-positioning techniques for minimizing motion artifacts in breast magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective volunteer study.","authors":"Norikazu Koori, Minami Suzuki, Nobukiyo Yoshida, Shohei Yamamoto, Shin Miyakawa, Kota Sasaki, Hiroki Nosaka, Kenji Yasue, Masato Takahashi, Koichi Hanada, Hajime Ichikawa, Kazuyuki Sumi, Kazuya Takeda, Hiraku Fuse","doi":"10.1007/s12282-026-01860-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assesses signal intensity changes across sequential image series (kinetic curves). Motion artifacts are common and often degrade image quality. However, the optimal patient positioning to minimize motion during breast MRI remains unclear. This study aimed to identify the most effective arm-positioning method for reducing motion artifacts during breast MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six female volunteers underwent MRI at seven time points using enhanced T<sub>1</sub> high-resolution isotropic volume excitation, a three-dimensional T<sub>1</sub>-weighted gradient-echo sequence with fat suppression. Each phase lasted 60 s and comprised seven serial images. Three arm-positions were tested: both-arms-raised, right-arm-raised, and both-arms-down. Motion was assessed using the visual evaluation score (VES) and the distance discordance metric (DDM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VES results were higher with both-arms-raised (2.52 ± 0.43; median: 2.60) than with arms-down (2.39 ± 0.61; median: 2.40) or the right-arm-raised (2.33 ± 0.57; median: 2.40). A significant difference in VES was observed between the both-arms-raised and right-arm-raised groups (P = .04). DDM values were lowest with both-arms-raised (1.02 ± 0.64; median: 0.85), followed by arm-down (1.89 ± 1.19; median: 1.50) and right-arm raised (1.65 ± 0.98; median: 1.56). Significant differences in DDM were observed between the both-arms-raised position and the other two positions (P < .05 and P < .001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Positioning patients with both-arms-raised effectively minimized motion-related artifacts during breast MRI. Conversely, the right-arm-raised position was associated with increased artifacts and should be avoided to maintain image quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":520574,"journal":{"name":"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)","volume":" ","pages":"853-861"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-026-01860-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assesses signal intensity changes across sequential image series (kinetic curves). Motion artifacts are common and often degrade image quality. However, the optimal patient positioning to minimize motion during breast MRI remains unclear. This study aimed to identify the most effective arm-positioning method for reducing motion artifacts during breast MRI.

Methods: Six female volunteers underwent MRI at seven time points using enhanced T1 high-resolution isotropic volume excitation, a three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence with fat suppression. Each phase lasted 60 s and comprised seven serial images. Three arm-positions were tested: both-arms-raised, right-arm-raised, and both-arms-down. Motion was assessed using the visual evaluation score (VES) and the distance discordance metric (DDM).

Results: VES results were higher with both-arms-raised (2.52 ± 0.43; median: 2.60) than with arms-down (2.39 ± 0.61; median: 2.40) or the right-arm-raised (2.33 ± 0.57; median: 2.40). A significant difference in VES was observed between the both-arms-raised and right-arm-raised groups (P = .04). DDM values were lowest with both-arms-raised (1.02 ± 0.64; median: 0.85), followed by arm-down (1.89 ± 1.19; median: 1.50) and right-arm raised (1.65 ± 0.98; median: 1.56). Significant differences in DDM were observed between the both-arms-raised position and the other two positions (P < .05 and P < .001, respectively).

Conclusion: Positioning patients with both-arms-raised effectively minimized motion-related artifacts during breast MRI. Conversely, the right-arm-raised position was associated with increased artifacts and should be avoided to maintain image quality.

三种手臂定位技术在乳房磁共振成像中减少运动伪影的比较:一项前瞻性志愿者研究。
背景:乳房磁共振成像(MRI)评估连续图像序列(动力学曲线)的信号强度变化。运动伪影很常见,经常会降低图像质量。然而,在乳房MRI过程中,患者的最佳体位仍不清楚。本研究旨在确定最有效的手臂定位方法,以减少乳房MRI期间的运动伪影。方法:6名女性志愿者在7个时间点使用增强T1高分辨率各向同性体积激发,三维T1加权梯度回波序列和脂肪抑制进行MRI。每个阶段持续60 s,由7幅连续图像组成。测试了三种手臂姿势:双臂举起、右臂举起和双臂放下。采用视觉评价评分(VES)和距离不一致度量(DDM)对运动进行评估。结果:双臂抬起组VES结果(2.52±0.43,中位数:2.60)高于双臂放下组(2.39±0.61,中位数:2.40)或右臂抬起组(2.33±0.57,中位数:2.40)。双臂抬高组与右臂抬高组VES差异有统计学意义(P = 0.04)。双臂抬起时DDM值最低(1.02±0.64,中位数:0.85),其次是双臂放下(1.89±1.19,中位数:1.50)和右臂抬起(1.65±0.98,中位数:1.56)。两臂抬高体位与其他两种体位的DDM差异有统计学意义(P)。结论:两臂抬高体位可有效减少乳房MRI中运动相关伪影。相反,右臂抬高的位置与增加的伪影有关,应该避免,以保持图像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书