Impact of Market Access Delays on Time to Patient Access: Multi-Country Comparative Analysis Assessing the First Commercial Launch Indications for Five Oncology Medicines Across Europe and Canada.

Q2 Medicine
Barry Crean, David Parry, Alison Horsfield, James Ryan, Nektarios Oraiopoulos
{"title":"Impact of Market Access Delays on Time to Patient Access: Multi-Country Comparative Analysis Assessing the First Commercial Launch Indications for Five Oncology Medicines Across Europe and Canada.","authors":"Barry Crean, David Parry, Alison Horsfield, James Ryan, Nektarios Oraiopoulos","doi":"10.3390/jmahp14020025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The benefit of pharmaceutical innovation manifests when patients access treatment. Following regulatory approval in Europe and Canada, reimbursement decisions depend on health technology assessments (HTAs), which can be prolonged. To quantify the impact of delays on patients, we evaluated market access timelines for olaparib, osimertinib, durvalumab, acalabrutinib, and trastuzumab deruxtecan across six high-income countries with established HTA systems (Canada, England, France, Germany, Italy, Spain). <b>Methods:</b> Time to access was from regulatory approval to reimbursement. Survival benefit was median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) assessed versus the comparator at approval and the latest data cut-off. The number of eligible patients per year multiplied by the years to patient access and survival benefit reflects the lost survival benefit. <b>Results:</b> Efficacy benefits observed at approval continued to the latest data cut-offs. The mean time to patient access was 18 months. Although this varied by country and treatment, with England and Germany typically being the fastest and France and Spain the slowest, timelines often exceeded the 180-day EU target despite identical evidence used in HTA submissions. This resulted in an estimated mean of 2836 patients being unable to access treatment and 3391 OS-derived and 2739 PFS-derived life-years lost. <b>Conclusions:</b> Access processes must evolve to ensure the timely realization of new medicines' benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13214782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmahp14020025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The benefit of pharmaceutical innovation manifests when patients access treatment. Following regulatory approval in Europe and Canada, reimbursement decisions depend on health technology assessments (HTAs), which can be prolonged. To quantify the impact of delays on patients, we evaluated market access timelines for olaparib, osimertinib, durvalumab, acalabrutinib, and trastuzumab deruxtecan across six high-income countries with established HTA systems (Canada, England, France, Germany, Italy, Spain). Methods: Time to access was from regulatory approval to reimbursement. Survival benefit was median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) assessed versus the comparator at approval and the latest data cut-off. The number of eligible patients per year multiplied by the years to patient access and survival benefit reflects the lost survival benefit. Results: Efficacy benefits observed at approval continued to the latest data cut-offs. The mean time to patient access was 18 months. Although this varied by country and treatment, with England and Germany typically being the fastest and France and Spain the slowest, timelines often exceeded the 180-day EU target despite identical evidence used in HTA submissions. This resulted in an estimated mean of 2836 patients being unable to access treatment and 3391 OS-derived and 2739 PFS-derived life-years lost. Conclusions: Access processes must evolve to ensure the timely realization of new medicines' benefits.

市场准入延迟对患者获得时间的影响:评估欧洲和加拿大五种肿瘤药物首次商业上市适应症的多国比较分析。
背景:药物创新的好处体现在患者获得治疗。在欧洲和加拿大获得监管部门批准后,报销决定取决于卫生技术评估(hta),这一过程可能会延长。为了量化延迟对患者的影响,我们评估了奥拉帕尼、奥西替尼、杜伐单抗、阿卡拉布替尼和曲妥珠单抗德鲁德康在六个高收入国家(加拿大、英国、法国、德国、意大利、西班牙)建立HTA系统的市场准入时间表。方法:获取时间从监管审批到报销。生存获益是在批准和最新数据截止时与比较药相比评估的中位总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。每年符合条件的患者数量乘以患者获得和生存获益的年数反映了失去的生存获益。结果:在批准时观察到的疗效持续到最新数据截止。患者接触的平均时间为18个月。尽管这因国家和治疗而异,英国和德国通常是最快的,法国和西班牙是最慢的,尽管在HTA提交的证据相同,但时间表经常超过欧盟180天的目标。这导致估计平均2836例患者无法获得治疗,3391例os衍生和2739例pfs衍生生命年损失。结论:获取流程必须不断发展,以确保及时实现新药的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书