Youran Lee, Qing Yang, Melissa Kay, Donald E Bailey, Biljana Gigic, Sheetal Hardikar, Adetunji T Toriola, David Shibata, Christopher I Li, Doratha A Byrd, Jane C Figueiredo, Ildiko Strehli, Megan Mclaws, Vaia Florou, Mmadili Ilozumba, Patricia Erickson, Apurva Medhe, Cornelia M Ulrich, Rosa M Gonzalez-Guarda
{"title":"Distinct Symptom Occurrence Subgroups Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Differences in Social Determinants of Health and Diet Quality.","authors":"Youran Lee, Qing Yang, Melissa Kay, Donald E Bailey, Biljana Gigic, Sheetal Hardikar, Adetunji T Toriola, David Shibata, Christopher I Li, Doratha A Byrd, Jane C Figueiredo, Ildiko Strehli, Megan Mclaws, Vaia Florou, Mmadili Ilozumba, Patricia Erickson, Apurva Medhe, Cornelia M Ulrich, Rosa M Gonzalez-Guarda","doi":"10.1002/nur.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States. Many patients with CRC experience physical and psychological symptoms that diminish quality of life and are shaped by social determinants of health (SDOH) and diet quality. This study aimed to (a) identify distinct symptom occurrence subgroups among patients with CRC, and (b) examine differences in SDOH characteristics and diet quality across these symptom occurrence subgroups. We conducted a secondary analysis of the ColoCare Study dataset from the Huntsman Cancer Institute, including CRC patients 6 months postdiagnosis. Latent class analysis identified subgroups based on the presence of symptoms. Chi-square tests and ANOVA examined subgroup differences in SDOH and diet quality, measured by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2020. Logistic regression adjusted for cancer stage, comorbidity status, neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Among 256 patients, three subgroups emerged: low (n = 84), moderate (n = 123), and high symptom occurrence (n = 49). Patients with high symptom occurrence were younger (F = 4.48, p = 0.01), more often Hispanic (χ² = 9.10, p = 0.01), had lower income (χ² = 12.92, p = 0.01), and more frequently received neoadjuvant therapy (χ² = 10.30, p = 0.006). They reported lower total social support (F = 5.60, p = 0.004) and poorer diet quality (F = 9.58, p = 0.0001). After adjustment, high symptom occurrence group had lower odds of adequate income (OR = 0.28, p = 0.0312), social support (OR = 0.886, p = 0.0100), and diet quality (OR = 0.94, p = 0.0156). Distinct CRC symptom profiles highlight the need for personalized dietary interventions and enhanced social support to improve symptom management. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Findings emphasize care strategies that address SDOH to optimize outcomes and quality of life for patients with CRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":"595-611"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13539668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.70083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States. Many patients with CRC experience physical and psychological symptoms that diminish quality of life and are shaped by social determinants of health (SDOH) and diet quality. This study aimed to (a) identify distinct symptom occurrence subgroups among patients with CRC, and (b) examine differences in SDOH characteristics and diet quality across these symptom occurrence subgroups. We conducted a secondary analysis of the ColoCare Study dataset from the Huntsman Cancer Institute, including CRC patients 6 months postdiagnosis. Latent class analysis identified subgroups based on the presence of symptoms. Chi-square tests and ANOVA examined subgroup differences in SDOH and diet quality, measured by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2020. Logistic regression adjusted for cancer stage, comorbidity status, neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Among 256 patients, three subgroups emerged: low (n = 84), moderate (n = 123), and high symptom occurrence (n = 49). Patients with high symptom occurrence were younger (F = 4.48, p = 0.01), more often Hispanic (χ² = 9.10, p = 0.01), had lower income (χ² = 12.92, p = 0.01), and more frequently received neoadjuvant therapy (χ² = 10.30, p = 0.006). They reported lower total social support (F = 5.60, p = 0.004) and poorer diet quality (F = 9.58, p = 0.0001). After adjustment, high symptom occurrence group had lower odds of adequate income (OR = 0.28, p = 0.0312), social support (OR = 0.886, p = 0.0100), and diet quality (OR = 0.94, p = 0.0156). Distinct CRC symptom profiles highlight the need for personalized dietary interventions and enhanced social support to improve symptom management. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Findings emphasize care strategies that address SDOH to optimize outcomes and quality of life for patients with CRC.
期刊介绍:
Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.