Burnout Experienced by Military Nurses: A Systematic Review.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Mollie F Christiansen, Tanekkia Taylor-Clark, Linda H Yoder, Deborah Kenny
{"title":"Burnout Experienced by Military Nurses: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Mollie F Christiansen, Tanekkia Taylor-Clark, Linda H Yoder, Deborah Kenny","doi":"10.1111/wvn.70145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burnout is associated with adverse physical and psychological health outcomes in civilian nurses. Among military populations, these adverse health outcomes have the potential to degrade readiness at both individual and system levels. There are few scientific studies about burnout among military nurses.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review was to critically examine the evidence regarding the prevalence and individual characteristics associated with burnout among active-duty military nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted using a comprehensive, iterative search. Peer-reviewed reports of studies that included burnout in the stated aim or research question and used a validated instrument to measure burnout were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies met inclusion criteria. The reported prevalence of burnout among military nurses was between 1.7% and 13.8%. Scoring, measurement, and operational definitions differed, so results should be interpreted with caution. Increased military and nursing experience, a higher volume of work hours, and working on non-day shifts may contribute to burnout among military nurses. Differences in burnout based on sex and military versus civilian status are mixed.</p><p><strong>Linking evidence to action: </strong>Researchers should consider alternative theoretical frameworks and measurement instruments when studying burnout among military nurses. Inconsistency in measurement methods from previous studies limits current understanding. Military-specific cultural concepts may play a role in mitigating burnout among military nurses.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>CRD420251036405.</p>","PeriodicalId":49355,"journal":{"name":"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing","volume":"23 3","pages":"e70145"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.70145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Burnout is associated with adverse physical and psychological health outcomes in civilian nurses. Among military populations, these adverse health outcomes have the potential to degrade readiness at both individual and system levels. There are few scientific studies about burnout among military nurses.

Aim: The purpose of this systematic review was to critically examine the evidence regarding the prevalence and individual characteristics associated with burnout among active-duty military nurses.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted using a comprehensive, iterative search. Peer-reviewed reports of studies that included burnout in the stated aim or research question and used a validated instrument to measure burnout were included.

Results: Five studies met inclusion criteria. The reported prevalence of burnout among military nurses was between 1.7% and 13.8%. Scoring, measurement, and operational definitions differed, so results should be interpreted with caution. Increased military and nursing experience, a higher volume of work hours, and working on non-day shifts may contribute to burnout among military nurses. Differences in burnout based on sex and military versus civilian status are mixed.

Linking evidence to action: Researchers should consider alternative theoretical frameworks and measurement instruments when studying burnout among military nurses. Inconsistency in measurement methods from previous studies limits current understanding. Military-specific cultural concepts may play a role in mitigating burnout among military nurses.

Trial registration: CRD420251036405.

军队护士职业倦怠的系统回顾。
背景:文职护士职业倦怠与不良的身心健康结果相关。在军事人群中,这些不利的健康结果有可能降低个人和系统层面的战备状态。关于军队护士职业倦怠的科学研究很少。目的:本系统综述的目的是严格检查现役军人护士中与职业倦怠相关的患病率和个体特征的证据。方法:采用全面、迭代检索的方法进行系统综述。将倦怠纳入既定目标或研究问题并使用有效工具测量倦怠的同行评审研究报告被纳入。结果:5项研究符合纳入标准。军队护士的倦怠率在1.7% ~ 13.8%之间。评分、度量和操作定义不同,因此应谨慎解释结果。军事和护理经验的增加,工作时间的增加,以及非白班工作可能会导致军事护士的倦怠。性别和军人与平民身份在职业倦怠方面的差异是复杂的。将证据与行动联系起来:研究人员在研究军人护士的职业倦怠时应考虑替代的理论框架和测量工具。以往研究中测量方法的不一致性限制了当前的理解。军人文化观念可能在缓解军人护士职业倦怠中发挥作用。试验注册:CRD420251036405。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.60%
发文量
72
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The leading nursing society that has brought you the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is pleased to bring you Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. Now publishing 6 issues per year, this peer-reviewed journal and top information resource from The Honor Society of Nursing, Sigma Theta Tau International, uniquely bridges knowledge and application, taking a global approach in its presentation of research, policy and practice, education and management, and its link to action in real world settings. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing is written especially for: Clinicians Researchers Nurse leaders Managers Administrators Educators Policymakers Worldviews on Evidence­-Based Nursing is a primary source of information for using evidence-based nursing practice to improve patient care by featuring: Knowledge synthesis articles with best practice applications and recommendations for linking evidence to action in real world practice, administra-tive, education and policy settings Original articles and features that present large-scale studies, which challenge and develop the knowledge base about evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare Special features and columns with information geared to readers’ diverse roles: clinical practice, education, research, policy and administration/leadership Commentaries about current evidence-based practice issues and developments A forum that encourages readers to engage in an ongoing dialogue on critical issues and questions in evidence-based nursing Reviews of the latest publications and resources on evidence-based nursing and healthcare News about professional organizations, conferences and other activities around the world related to evidence-based nursing Links to other global evidence-based nursing resources and organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书