Wheelchair user spatial clustering in Wales is associated with socioeconomic deprivation: a multi-domain analysis using the Welsh index of multiple deprivation.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Dean Pym
{"title":"Wheelchair user spatial clustering in Wales is associated with socioeconomic deprivation: a multi-domain analysis using the Welsh index of multiple deprivation.","authors":"Dean Pym","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2026.2678549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Wheelchair users represent a population with significant and often permanent mobility impairment. Despite well-established links between disability and socioeconomic deprivation, the geographic relationship between wheelchair user concentration and area-level deprivation has not previously been examined at national scale. This study aimed to identify spatial clusters of wheelchair users across Wales and characterise their association with socioeconomic deprivation across domains of the Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation (WIMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional ecological study used 43,790 NHS-registered wheelchair users across all 1,917 Lower Layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in Wales. Local Moran's I identified statistically significant High-High (HH) spatial clusters of wheelchair user counts. Chi-square goodness of fit tests, chi-square tests of association, and binary logistic regression quantified the association between WIMD deprivation quintile (Q1-5) and HH clustering across WIMD domain, with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction applied throughout.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred-and-ten HH clusters were identified, with 41% in the most deprived WIMD Overall quintile. Significant deprivation gradients were observed across six domains; Health and Employment showed the strongest associations, with Q1:Q5 wheelchair user ratios of 1.747 and 1.738 and up to 20-fold greater odds of HH cluster membership in the most deprived quintile. Housing and Access to Services showed divergent patterns, with clusters concentrated in areas of moderate rather than extreme deprivation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Wheelchair user spatial clustering in Wales is strongly associated with socioeconomic deprivation, but the association varies by WIMD domain. These findings provide actionable spatial evidence to support equitable NHS wheelchair service commissioning aligned with true geographic need.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"3850-3862"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2026.2678549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Wheelchair users represent a population with significant and often permanent mobility impairment. Despite well-established links between disability and socioeconomic deprivation, the geographic relationship between wheelchair user concentration and area-level deprivation has not previously been examined at national scale. This study aimed to identify spatial clusters of wheelchair users across Wales and characterise their association with socioeconomic deprivation across domains of the Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation (WIMD).

Methods: This cross-sectional ecological study used 43,790 NHS-registered wheelchair users across all 1,917 Lower Layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in Wales. Local Moran's I identified statistically significant High-High (HH) spatial clusters of wheelchair user counts. Chi-square goodness of fit tests, chi-square tests of association, and binary logistic regression quantified the association between WIMD deprivation quintile (Q1-5) and HH clustering across WIMD domain, with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction applied throughout.

Results: One-hundred-and-ten HH clusters were identified, with 41% in the most deprived WIMD Overall quintile. Significant deprivation gradients were observed across six domains; Health and Employment showed the strongest associations, with Q1:Q5 wheelchair user ratios of 1.747 and 1.738 and up to 20-fold greater odds of HH cluster membership in the most deprived quintile. Housing and Access to Services showed divergent patterns, with clusters concentrated in areas of moderate rather than extreme deprivation.

Conclusions: Wheelchair user spatial clustering in Wales is strongly associated with socioeconomic deprivation, but the association varies by WIMD domain. These findings provide actionable spatial evidence to support equitable NHS wheelchair service commissioning aligned with true geographic need.

威尔士轮椅使用者空间聚类与社会经济剥夺有关:使用威尔士多重剥夺指数的多域分析。
目的:轮椅使用者代表了具有严重且通常是永久性行动障碍的人群。尽管残疾和社会经济剥夺之间存在着公认的联系,但轮椅使用者集中度和地区水平剥夺之间的地理关系此前尚未在全国范围内进行过研究。本研究旨在确定威尔士轮椅使用者的空间集群,并描述他们与威尔士多重剥夺指数(WIMD)各领域的社会经济剥夺的关系。方法:这项横断面生态研究使用了威尔士所有1,917个底层超级输出区(LSOAs)的43,790名nhs注册的轮椅使用者。本地Moran's I确定了统计上显著的高-高(HH)空间集群的轮椅使用者计数。卡方拟合优度检验、关联检验和二元逻辑回归量化了WIMD剥夺五分位数(Q1-5)与跨WIMD域HH聚类之间的关系,并自始至终应用了Benjamini-Hochberg错误发现率校正。结果:确定了110个HH集群,其中41%在最贫困的WIMD总体五分位数中。在六个领域观察到显著的剥夺梯度;健康和就业表现出最强的关联,Q1:Q5轮椅使用者的比率为1.747和1.738,在最贫困的五分之一中,HH集群成员的几率高达20倍。住房和获得服务的机会表现出不同的模式,集中在中度而非极度贫困的地区。结论:威尔士轮椅使用者的空间聚集与社会经济剥夺密切相关,但这种关联因WIMD域而异。这些发现提供了可操作的空间证据,以支持公平的NHS轮椅服务调试与真实的地理需求相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书