Associations of spousal support with career attrition in academic medicine: a multi-specialty cross-sectional survey study.

IF 2.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ciara C O'Sullivan, Sarah M Jenkins, Andrea L Hunderfund, Kathryn J Ruddy, Colin P West, Ariela L Marshall
{"title":"Associations of spousal support with career attrition in academic medicine: a multi-specialty cross-sectional survey study.","authors":"Ciara C O'Sullivan, Sarah M Jenkins, Andrea L Hunderfund, Kathryn J Ruddy, Colin P West, Ariela L Marshall","doi":"10.1136/leader-2025-001407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Little is known about how factors external to the workplace, such as spousal support, influence physician attrition.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore associations of spousal support among married/partnered physicians with both 'hard' attrition ((HA), considering leaving academic medicine within 2 years) and 'soft' attrition ((SA), having ever considered part-time work), before and after adjusting for demographic variables, burnout and satisfaction with work-life integration (WLI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This cross-sectional survey study was conducted among faculty physicians employed at Mayo Clinic.</p><p><strong>Outcomes and measures: </strong>Survey items measured demographics, spousal support (five items), HA, SA, satisfaction with WLI (single-item measure) and burnout (two-item measure). Check-all-that-apply questions explored reasons for considering attrition. We investigated associations of spousal career support with attrition consideration using logistic regression analyses, adjusting for demographic variables then for WLI satisfaction and burnout.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>739/2103 physicians responded (response rate 35.1%); 666 (90.1%) were married or partnered and responded to the HA question. 42.5% (283/666) reported considering HA and 60.9% of full-time employees (288/473) had ever considered SA. 65.5% (437/666) considered any attrition (AA). Respondents reporting more frequent spousal career support had lower odds of HA (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.94, p=0.006), though this was not significant when considering AA (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.01, p=0.07). Neither association was significant after adjusting for WLI satisfaction and burnout (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.29, p=0.91 (HA), OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.37, p=0.45 (any attrition)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While spousal support was no longer significantly associated with attrition after adjusting for WLI satisfaction and burnout, it may mitigate attrition.</p>","PeriodicalId":36677,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Leader","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2025-001407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Little is known about how factors external to the workplace, such as spousal support, influence physician attrition.

Objectives: To explore associations of spousal support among married/partnered physicians with both 'hard' attrition ((HA), considering leaving academic medicine within 2 years) and 'soft' attrition ((SA), having ever considered part-time work), before and after adjusting for demographic variables, burnout and satisfaction with work-life integration (WLI).

Design: This cross-sectional survey study was conducted among faculty physicians employed at Mayo Clinic.

Outcomes and measures: Survey items measured demographics, spousal support (five items), HA, SA, satisfaction with WLI (single-item measure) and burnout (two-item measure). Check-all-that-apply questions explored reasons for considering attrition. We investigated associations of spousal career support with attrition consideration using logistic regression analyses, adjusting for demographic variables then for WLI satisfaction and burnout.

Results: 739/2103 physicians responded (response rate 35.1%); 666 (90.1%) were married or partnered and responded to the HA question. 42.5% (283/666) reported considering HA and 60.9% of full-time employees (288/473) had ever considered SA. 65.5% (437/666) considered any attrition (AA). Respondents reporting more frequent spousal career support had lower odds of HA (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.94, p=0.006), though this was not significant when considering AA (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.01, p=0.07). Neither association was significant after adjusting for WLI satisfaction and burnout (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.29, p=0.91 (HA), OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.37, p=0.45 (any attrition)).

Conclusions: While spousal support was no longer significantly associated with attrition after adjusting for WLI satisfaction and burnout, it may mitigate attrition.

学术医学中配偶支持与职业损耗的关系:一项多专业横断面调查研究。
重要性:对于工作场所以外的因素,如配偶的支持,如何影响医生的流失,我们知之甚少。目的:探讨在调整人口统计变量、职业倦怠和工作生活整合满意度(WLI)之前和之后,已婚/有伴侣的医生的配偶支持与“硬”流失((HA),考虑在2年内离开学术医学)和“软”流失((SA),曾经考虑过兼职工作)的关系。设计:本横断面调查研究是在梅奥诊所的教员医师中进行的。结果和测量:调查项目测量了人口统计学,配偶支持(五个项目),HA, SA,对工作的满意度(单项测量)和倦怠(两项测量)。检查所有适用的问题探讨了考虑人员流失的原因。我们使用逻辑回归分析来调查配偶职业支持与离职考虑的关系,调整了人口统计学变量,然后调整了工作满意度和职业倦怠。结果:739/2103名医生有应答(应答率35.1%);666人(90.1%)已婚或有伴侣,并对医管局的问题作出回应。42.5%(283/666)的全职雇员表示会考虑医管局,而60.9%(288/473)的全职雇员曾考虑辅助服务。65.5%(437/666)认为有任何减员(AA)。受访者报告更频繁的配偶职业支持有较低的HA几率(OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68至0.94,p=0.006),尽管这在考虑AA时并不显著(OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71至1.01,p=0.07)。在调整工作满意度和倦怠后,两种关联均不显著(OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.80至1.29,p=0.91 (HA), OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.86至1.37,p=0.45(任何人员流失))。结论:在调整工作满意度和倦怠后,配偶支持与员工流失不再显著相关,但配偶支持可能会减轻员工流失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Leader
BMJ Leader Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.40%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书