Effects of expiratory muscle strength training on swallowing in survivors of critical illness: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

IF 1.9 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Pub Date : 2026-05-20 eCollection Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1177/17511437261444651
Philip Skurok, Brian W Johnston, Emma Brown, Caroline Timothy, Christopher Morse, Peter Turton
{"title":"Effects of expiratory muscle strength training on swallowing in survivors of critical illness: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.","authors":"Philip Skurok, Brian W Johnston, Emma Brown, Caroline Timothy, Christopher Morse, Peter Turton","doi":"10.1177/17511437261444651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-extubation dysphagia (PED) is a common complication of critical illness and is associated with aspiration pneumonia, prolonged hospitalisation, and prolonged recovery. Expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) has been shown to improve swallowing function in selected populations, but its role in survivors of critical illness remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review the evidence evaluating the effects of EMST on swallowing outcomes in survivors of critical illness with PED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023444479) and conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Searches of MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were performed from 2000 to March 2026. Eligible studies included adult patients requiring >48 h of mechanical ventilation who underwent volitional EMST following extubation. Due to anticipated limited evidence, all quantitative study designs were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three studies met inclusion criteria, including two from the same research group: one case series (<i>n</i> = 2) and two single-group cohort studies (<i>n</i> = 50 and <i>n</i> = 13). All studies reported improvements in swallowing measures, alongside increases in respiratory muscle strength and cough flow. However, EMST was either combined with inspiratory muscle training or other therapies, and no randomised controlled trials were identified. Methodological quality was low, with high risk of bias and absence of comparator groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence supporting EMST for PED in survivors of critical illness is extremely limited and of low methodological quality. Whilst mechanistic plausibility and data from other populations suggest potential benefit, robust randomised controlled trials with standardised training protocols and outcome measures are required before clinical implementation can be recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"355-366"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13190362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437261444651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post-extubation dysphagia (PED) is a common complication of critical illness and is associated with aspiration pneumonia, prolonged hospitalisation, and prolonged recovery. Expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) has been shown to improve swallowing function in selected populations, but its role in survivors of critical illness remains unclear.

Objective: To systematically review the evidence evaluating the effects of EMST on swallowing outcomes in survivors of critical illness with PED.

Methods: This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023444479) and conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Searches of MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were performed from 2000 to March 2026. Eligible studies included adult patients requiring >48 h of mechanical ventilation who underwent volitional EMST following extubation. Due to anticipated limited evidence, all quantitative study designs were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity.

Results: Three studies met inclusion criteria, including two from the same research group: one case series (n = 2) and two single-group cohort studies (n = 50 and n = 13). All studies reported improvements in swallowing measures, alongside increases in respiratory muscle strength and cough flow. However, EMST was either combined with inspiratory muscle training or other therapies, and no randomised controlled trials were identified. Methodological quality was low, with high risk of bias and absence of comparator groups.

Conclusions: Evidence supporting EMST for PED in survivors of critical illness is extremely limited and of low methodological quality. Whilst mechanistic plausibility and data from other populations suggest potential benefit, robust randomised controlled trials with standardised training protocols and outcome measures are required before clinical implementation can be recommended.

呼气肌力训练对危重病幸存者吞咽的影响:系统回顾和叙述综合。
背景:拔管后吞咽困难(PED)是危重症的常见并发症,与吸入性肺炎、住院时间延长和恢复时间延长有关。呼气肌力量训练(EMST)已被证明可以改善特定人群的吞咽功能,但其在危重疾病幸存者中的作用尚不清楚。目的:系统回顾评价EMST对重症PED患者吞咽结局影响的证据。方法:本系统评价在PROSPERO注册(CRD42023444479),并按照PRISMA指南进行。检索自2000年至2026年3月的MEDLINE、PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL和Cochrane数据库。符合条件的研究包括需要bbbb48小时机械通气并在拔管后进行自发性EMST的成年患者。由于预期证据有限,所有定量研究设计均被纳入。偏倚风险评估使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和乔安娜布里格斯研究所的检查表。由于异质性,未进行meta分析。结果:3项研究符合纳入标准,其中2项来自同一研究组:1项病例系列研究(n = 2)和2项单组队列研究(n = 50和n = 13)。所有研究都报告了吞咽措施的改善,以及呼吸肌力量和咳嗽流量的增加。然而,EMST要么与吸气肌训练相结合,要么与其他疗法相结合,没有发现随机对照试验。方法学质量较低,偏倚风险高,缺少比较组。结论:支持EMST治疗危重疾病幸存者PED的证据非常有限,而且方法学质量很低。虽然机制上的合理性和来自其他人群的数据表明了潜在的益处,但在推荐临床实施之前,需要进行具有标准化培训方案和结果测量的可靠随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书