Impact of ASTCT Toxicity Grading System on Outcomes After CAR-T for Mature B-Cell Malignancies

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jtct.2026.05.032
Marina Gomez-Llobell, Silvia Escribano Serrat, Maria Bromberg, Venkatraman Seshan, Sean Devlin, Sigrun Einarsdottir, Ori Ben Valid, Noa Golan-Aceb, Ronit Marcus, Avichai Simoni, Ofrat Beyar-Katz, Shoshan Perek, Ali Abed Al Wahad, Magdalena Corona, Kai Rejeski, Sandeep S. Raj, Parastoo Dahi, Michael Scordo, Gunjan L. Shah, M. Lia Palomba, Miguel-Angel Perales
{"title":"Impact of ASTCT Toxicity Grading System on Outcomes After CAR-T for Mature B-Cell Malignancies","authors":"Marina Gomez-Llobell,&nbsp;Silvia Escribano Serrat,&nbsp;Maria Bromberg,&nbsp;Venkatraman Seshan,&nbsp;Sean Devlin,&nbsp;Sigrun Einarsdottir,&nbsp;Ori Ben Valid,&nbsp;Noa Golan-Aceb,&nbsp;Ronit Marcus,&nbsp;Avichai Simoni,&nbsp;Ofrat Beyar-Katz,&nbsp;Shoshan Perek,&nbsp;Ali Abed Al Wahad,&nbsp;Magdalena Corona,&nbsp;Kai Rejeski,&nbsp;Sandeep S. Raj,&nbsp;Parastoo Dahi,&nbsp;Michael Scordo,&nbsp;Gunjan L. Shah,&nbsp;M. Lia Palomba,&nbsp;Miguel-Angel Perales","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2026.05.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) consensus grading system standardized the classification of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. However, the prognostic relevance of CRS and ICANS, as well as immune effector cell-associated hematological toxicity (ICAHT), remains incompletely defined. In this multicenter retrospective study, adult patients with mature B-cell malignancies treated with CD19-directed CAR-T therapy between 2016 and 2024 at three academic centers were included. CRS and ICANS were graded according to ASTCT criteria, and early ICAHT according to EHA/EBMT consensus definitions. The primary endpoint was non-relapse mortality (NRM); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Outcomes were evaluated using day 30 landmark analyses with multivariable models stratified by center and adjusted for clinically relevant covariates; a complementary sensitivity analysis modeled CRS as a time-dependent covariate for NRM in the full cohort from day 0. Among 560 patients, axi-cel was the most frequently used product (48%), followed by tisa-cel (25%), liso-cel (23%) and brexu-cel (4%). With a median follow-up of 23.9 months, the 2-year cumulative incidence of NRM for the full cohort was 7.2%, with 2-year OS and PFS of 57% and 41%, respectively. Overall, 140 patients (25%) and 61 (11%) developed grade 2 and grade 3 to 4 CRS, respectively; 40 (7%) and 74 (13%) developed grade 2 and grade 3 to 4 ICANS, respectively; and 151 (30%) and 144 (29%) developed grade 2 and grade 3 to 4 early ICAHT, respectively. In a day +30 landmark analysis adjusted for baseline covariates, CRS and early ICAHT severity was not independently associated with NRM, OS, or PFS. In contrast, grade ≥3 ICANS was independently associated with increased NRM (HR: 2.46, 95% CI, 1.00 to 6.04) and inferior OS (HR: 1.79, 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.81), but not with PFS. In the sensitivity analysis, grade 3 to 4 CRS was associated with NRM in univariable but not in multivariable analysis. In this real-world cohort of patients treated with CD19 CAR-T cells, we found that high grade ICANS retained independent prognostic significance for outcomes beyond day 30, whereas CRS and early ICAHT did not; however, severe CRS may still contribute to early treatment-related mortality. These findings support the clinical utility of modern grading systems for outcome interpretation and emphasize neurotoxicity as a priority for preventive interventions after CD19 CAR-T therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":"32 10","pages":"Pages 1346.e1-1346.e12"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666636726004215","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) consensus grading system standardized the classification of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. However, the prognostic relevance of CRS and ICANS, as well as immune effector cell-associated hematological toxicity (ICAHT), remains incompletely defined. In this multicenter retrospective study, adult patients with mature B-cell malignancies treated with CD19-directed CAR-T therapy between 2016 and 2024 at three academic centers were included. CRS and ICANS were graded according to ASTCT criteria, and early ICAHT according to EHA/EBMT consensus definitions. The primary endpoint was non-relapse mortality (NRM); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Outcomes were evaluated using day 30 landmark analyses with multivariable models stratified by center and adjusted for clinically relevant covariates; a complementary sensitivity analysis modeled CRS as a time-dependent covariate for NRM in the full cohort from day 0. Among 560 patients, axi-cel was the most frequently used product (48%), followed by tisa-cel (25%), liso-cel (23%) and brexu-cel (4%). With a median follow-up of 23.9 months, the 2-year cumulative incidence of NRM for the full cohort was 7.2%, with 2-year OS and PFS of 57% and 41%, respectively. Overall, 140 patients (25%) and 61 (11%) developed grade 2 and grade 3 to 4 CRS, respectively; 40 (7%) and 74 (13%) developed grade 2 and grade 3 to 4 ICANS, respectively; and 151 (30%) and 144 (29%) developed grade 2 and grade 3 to 4 early ICAHT, respectively. In a day +30 landmark analysis adjusted for baseline covariates, CRS and early ICAHT severity was not independently associated with NRM, OS, or PFS. In contrast, grade ≥3 ICANS was independently associated with increased NRM (HR: 2.46, 95% CI, 1.00 to 6.04) and inferior OS (HR: 1.79, 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.81), but not with PFS. In the sensitivity analysis, grade 3 to 4 CRS was associated with NRM in univariable but not in multivariable analysis. In this real-world cohort of patients treated with CD19 CAR-T cells, we found that high grade ICANS retained independent prognostic significance for outcomes beyond day 30, whereas CRS and early ICAHT did not; however, severe CRS may still contribute to early treatment-related mortality. These findings support the clinical utility of modern grading systems for outcome interpretation and emphasize neurotoxicity as a priority for preventive interventions after CD19 CAR-T therapy.
ASTCT毒性分级系统对成熟b细胞恶性肿瘤CAR-T治疗后预后的影响。
背景:美国移植与细胞治疗学会(ASTCT)共识分级系统规范了嵌合抗原受体(CAR) t细胞治疗后细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)的分类。然而,CRS和ICANS以及免疫效应细胞相关血液学毒性(ICAHT)的预后相关性仍未完全确定。方法:在这项多中心回顾性研究中,纳入了2016年至2024年间在三个学术中心接受cd19靶向CAR-T治疗的成年成熟b细胞恶性肿瘤患者。CRS和ICANS根据ASTCT标准分级,早期ICAHT根据EHA/EBMT共识定义分级。主要终点为非复发死亡率(NRM);次要终点包括总生存(OS)和无进展生存(PFS)。采用第30天里程碑式分析评价结果,采用多变量模型按中心分层,并根据临床相关协变量进行调整;一项补充敏感性分析将CRS建模为从第0天开始的整个队列中NRM的时间相关协变量。结果:560例患者中,使用频率最高的是axis -cel(48%),其次是tisa-cel(25%)、liso-cel(23%)和brexus -cel(4%)。中位随访时间为23.9个月,整个队列的2年累计NRM发生率为7.2%,2年OS和PFS分别为57%和41%。总体而言,140名患者(25%)和61名患者(11%)分别发展为2级和3-4级CRS;40例(7%)和74例(13%)分别发展为2级和3-4级ICANS;151例(30%)和144例(29%)分别发展为2级和3-4级早期ICAHT。在对基线协变量进行调整后的30天里程碑分析中,CRS和早期ICAHT严重程度与NRM、OS或PFS没有独立关联。相比之下,≥3级ICANS与NRM增加(HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.00-6.04)和OS较差(HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.14-2.81)独立相关,但与PFS无关。在敏感性分析中,3-4级CRS与NRM在单变量分析中存在相关性,而在多变量分析中无相关性。结论:在这个接受CD19 CAR-T细胞治疗的现实世界患者队列中,我们发现高级别ICANS对超过30天的预后仍然具有独立的预后意义,而CRS和早期ICAHT则没有;然而,严重的CRS仍可能导致早期治疗相关的死亡。这些发现支持了现代分级系统用于结果解释的临床应用,并强调神经毒性是CD19 CAR-T治疗后预防性干预的优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
15.60%
发文量
1061
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书