Reframing myofascial pain syndrome: pathological disorder or adaptive protective response?

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease Pub Date : 2026-05-21 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1759720X261449903
Mauro Guzzardo, Tomas Nakazato-Nakamine
{"title":"Reframing myofascial pain syndrome: pathological disorder or adaptive protective response?","authors":"Mauro Guzzardo, Tomas Nakazato-Nakamine","doi":"10.1177/1759720X261449903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is one of the most common causes of chronic pain. It is characterized by trigger points (TrPs) that are located within palpable taut bands (TBs) in muscles and their fascial structures. Traditionally, this clinical condition has been regarded as a dysfunction of the musculoskeletal system, commonly associated with mechanical overload, such as acute strain, repetitive movements, and/or abnormal posture holding. However, the intrinsic mechanisms underlying its development remain a subject of debate. This review proposes a paradigm shift: to consider MPS as a physiological protective response rather than a pathological disorder. From this perspective, the TrP-TB complex may represent a dual contributor to structural and functional protection. On the one hand, it might limit potentially harmful movements through local and segmental sensitization mechanisms. On the other hand, it could enhance joint stability by increasing the tension of the muscle fibers that form the TB and its intramuscular connective tissue, potentially augmenting proprioceptive input. This new perspective offers a revised conceptual framework in which phenomena traditionally interpreted as purposeless manifestations of painful dysfunction may instead be understood as defensive and/or compensatory responses. Such a perspective both broadens understanding of MPS and may encourage the development of treatment protocols that go beyond classical techniques, which focus mainly on inactivating TrPs and managing pain. This new perspective suggests incorporating strategies to modulate load, perform functional training, and address both peripheral and central sensitization within a comprehensive, multilevel framework. Ultimately, this perspective may help achieve more durable and sustainable therapeutic outcomes, possibly contributing to a reduction in the prevalence of pain-related disability associated with MPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":23056,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease","volume":"18 ","pages":"1759720X261449903"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13195234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X261449903","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is one of the most common causes of chronic pain. It is characterized by trigger points (TrPs) that are located within palpable taut bands (TBs) in muscles and their fascial structures. Traditionally, this clinical condition has been regarded as a dysfunction of the musculoskeletal system, commonly associated with mechanical overload, such as acute strain, repetitive movements, and/or abnormal posture holding. However, the intrinsic mechanisms underlying its development remain a subject of debate. This review proposes a paradigm shift: to consider MPS as a physiological protective response rather than a pathological disorder. From this perspective, the TrP-TB complex may represent a dual contributor to structural and functional protection. On the one hand, it might limit potentially harmful movements through local and segmental sensitization mechanisms. On the other hand, it could enhance joint stability by increasing the tension of the muscle fibers that form the TB and its intramuscular connective tissue, potentially augmenting proprioceptive input. This new perspective offers a revised conceptual framework in which phenomena traditionally interpreted as purposeless manifestations of painful dysfunction may instead be understood as defensive and/or compensatory responses. Such a perspective both broadens understanding of MPS and may encourage the development of treatment protocols that go beyond classical techniques, which focus mainly on inactivating TrPs and managing pain. This new perspective suggests incorporating strategies to modulate load, perform functional training, and address both peripheral and central sensitization within a comprehensive, multilevel framework. Ultimately, this perspective may help achieve more durable and sustainable therapeutic outcomes, possibly contributing to a reduction in the prevalence of pain-related disability associated with MPS.

重塑肌筋膜疼痛综合征:病理障碍还是适应性保护反应?
肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)是慢性疼痛最常见的原因之一。其特征是触发点(TrPs)位于肌肉及其筋膜结构的可触及的紧绷带(TBs)内。传统上,这种临床状况被认为是肌肉骨骼系统的功能障碍,通常与机械负荷有关,如急性劳损、重复运动和/或异常的姿势保持。然而,其发展的内在机制仍然是一个有争议的主题。这篇综述提出了一种范式转变:将MPS视为一种生理保护反应,而不是一种病理障碍。从这个角度来看,TrP-TB复合物可能具有结构和功能保护的双重作用。一方面,它可能通过局部和节段致敏机制限制潜在的有害运动。另一方面,它可以通过增加形成TB及其肌内结缔组织的肌纤维的张力来增强关节的稳定性,从而潜在地增加本体感觉输入。这个新的观点提供了一个修订的概念框架,在这个框架中,传统上被解释为疼痛功能障碍的无目的表现的现象可以被理解为防御和/或代偿反应。这样的观点既拓宽了对MPS的理解,也可能鼓励超越经典技术的治疗方案的发展,这些技术主要侧重于使trp失活和控制疼痛。这个新的观点建议在综合的、多层次的框架内结合策略来调节负荷,进行功能训练,并解决外周和中枢敏化问题。最终,这种观点可能有助于实现更持久和可持续的治疗结果,可能有助于减少与MPS相关的疼痛相关残疾的患病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of musculoskeletal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书