Vertical and horizontal trust in relation to post-pandemic resilience: threat and coping appraisal-based pathways across health-crisis contexts and over time.

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Le-Yi Zhang, Yi-Hui Christine Huang
{"title":"Vertical and horizontal trust in relation to post-pandemic resilience: threat and coping appraisal-based pathways across health-crisis contexts and over time.","authors":"Le-Yi Zhang, Yi-Hui Christine Huang","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2026.2677079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examines how vertical (institutional) and horizontal (in-group social) trust relate to post-pandemic resilience through threat appraisals (perceived severity and loss-based negative emotions) and coping appraisal (self-efficacy), and whether these associations remain stable across health-crisis contexts and over time.</p><p><strong>Methods and measures: </strong>Structural equation modelling was conducted using three Hong Kong datasets: the post-pandemic cross-sectional COVID-19 (<i>N</i> = 1,913) and the respiratory infectious disease sample (<i>N</i> = 1,498), and a two-wave COVID-19 panel spanning the intra- to post-pandemic period (<i>N</i> = 694).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the two cross-sectional datasets, vertical trust was positively associated with resilience through self-efficacy, whereas horizontal trust was positively associated with resilience through self-efficacy but negatively associated through threat appraisals. Equality-constraint tests across two datasets further showed that horizontal trust had stronger associations with resilience and both appraisals than vertical trust, and that its direct and coping appraisals to resilience were more stable across health-crisis contexts. Longitudinally, only intra-pandemic horizontal trust remained positively associated with post-pandemic resilience through coping appraisal, whereas vertical trust showed a limited long-term association.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effect of horizontal trust on resilience appears more robust across contexts and time, particularly through self-efficacy, whereas vertical trust appears more contemporaneous and less durable.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2026.2677079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examines how vertical (institutional) and horizontal (in-group social) trust relate to post-pandemic resilience through threat appraisals (perceived severity and loss-based negative emotions) and coping appraisal (self-efficacy), and whether these associations remain stable across health-crisis contexts and over time.

Methods and measures: Structural equation modelling was conducted using three Hong Kong datasets: the post-pandemic cross-sectional COVID-19 (N = 1,913) and the respiratory infectious disease sample (N = 1,498), and a two-wave COVID-19 panel spanning the intra- to post-pandemic period (N = 694).

Results: Across the two cross-sectional datasets, vertical trust was positively associated with resilience through self-efficacy, whereas horizontal trust was positively associated with resilience through self-efficacy but negatively associated through threat appraisals. Equality-constraint tests across two datasets further showed that horizontal trust had stronger associations with resilience and both appraisals than vertical trust, and that its direct and coping appraisals to resilience were more stable across health-crisis contexts. Longitudinally, only intra-pandemic horizontal trust remained positively associated with post-pandemic resilience through coping appraisal, whereas vertical trust showed a limited long-term association.

Conclusion: The effect of horizontal trust on resilience appears more robust across contexts and time, particularly through self-efficacy, whereas vertical trust appears more contemporaneous and less durable.

与大流行后复原力相关的纵向和横向信任:跨越健康危机背景和时间的基于威胁和应对评估的途径
目的:本研究通过威胁评估(感知到的严重程度和基于损失的负面情绪)和应对评估(自我效能),探讨垂直(制度)和水平(群体内社会)信任与大流行后复原力的关系,以及这些关联是否在健康危机背景下和随着时间的推移保持稳定。方法和措施:使用三个香港数据集进行结构方程建模:大流行后横断面COVID-19 (N = 1913)和呼吸道传染病样本(N = 1,498),以及跨越大流行期间至后时期的两波COVID-19面板(N = 694)。结果:纵向信任通过自我效能与心理弹性正相关,横向信任通过自我效能与心理弹性正相关,通过威胁评价与心理弹性负相关。跨两个数据集的平等约束测试进一步表明,水平信任与恢复力和两种评价的关联比垂直信任更强,其对恢复力的直接和应对评价在健康危机背景下更稳定。纵向上,通过应对评估,只有大流行内横向信任与大流行后复原力呈正相关,而纵向信任则显示出有限的长期关联。结论:横向信任对心理弹性的影响在不同的情境和时间中表现得更为显著,尤其是在自我效能感方面,而纵向信任则表现得更同步,更不持久。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书