Lukas Plachy, Petra Dusatkova, Lukas Kavciak, Shenali Anne Amaratunga, Matvei Slavenko, Jana Drabova, Klara Maratova, Vit Neuman, Barbora Obermannova, Stanislava Kolouskova, Marta Snajderova, Zdenek Sumnik, Jan Lebl, Stepanka Pruhova
{"title":"Beyond GH stimulation tests: genetic heterogeneity and treatment response in children with diagnosed GH deficiency.","authors":"Lukas Plachy, Petra Dusatkova, Lukas Kavciak, Shenali Anne Amaratunga, Matvei Slavenko, Jana Drabova, Klara Maratova, Vit Neuman, Barbora Obermannova, Stanislava Kolouskova, Marta Snajderova, Zdenek Sumnik, Jan Lebl, Stepanka Pruhova","doi":"10.1210/jendso/bvag106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Growth hormone (GH) stimulation tests have limited reliability and may lead to false-positive results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This work aimed to evaluate genetic causes of short stature in children clinically diagnosed with GH deficiency (GHD) and assess genotype-phenotype correlations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective single-center study was conducted including 233 children with clinically diagnosed primary GHD treated with GH for 5 years or more. Genetic testing was performed using a targeted next-generation sequencing panel of 398 growth-associated genes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A genetic cause was identified in 39 of 233 (17%) children. Only 13 of 39 (33%) findings confirmed GHD (genes <i>CHD7</i>, <i>GH1, GHSR</i>, <i>GLI2</i>, <i>GNAO1</i>, <i>KMT2D</i>, <i>OTX2</i> [3], <i>POU1F1</i>, <i>PROP1</i>, <i>SALL4</i>, <i>TBX3</i>). The remaining 26 of 39 (67%) revealed alternative etiologies of growth failure: RASopathies (13/39; genes <i>NF1</i> [2], <i>PTPN11</i> [7], <i>RAF1</i>, <i>SOS1</i> [2], <i>SPRED1</i>), growth plate disorders (8/39; genes <i>ACAN</i>, <i>COL2A1</i>, <i>EXT2</i>, <i>FGFR3</i> [2], <i>NPR2</i> [3]), and miscellaneous conditions (5/39; genes <i>CDC42</i>, <i>LMNA</i>, <i>HMGA2</i>, <i>PMM2</i>, <i>RAI1</i>). Genetically confirmed GHD patients presented with lower peak GH (median 1.8 vs 4.8 [alternative genetic etiology] and 5.9 μg/L [no genetic etiology]; <i>P</i> = .017), more frequent combined pituitary hormone deficiency (46% vs 4% and 12%; <i>P</i> = .001) and magnetic resonance imaging midbrain abnormalities (73% vs 14% vs 32%; <i>P</i> = .003). Conversely, the alternative etiology group demonstrated the least robust 5-year GH therapy response (median height gain 1.4 vs 2.3 [GHD group] and 1.8 [no genetic etiology]; <i>P</i> = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The population of children clinically diagnosed with GHD is genetically heterogeneous. A statistically significant proportion harbors defects in RAS-MAPK signaling or growth plate disorders, highlighting the limitations of current methods of GHD diagnostics.</p>","PeriodicalId":17334,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Endocrine Society","volume":"10 6","pages":"bvag106"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13191594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Endocrine Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvag106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Growth hormone (GH) stimulation tests have limited reliability and may lead to false-positive results.
Objective: This work aimed to evaluate genetic causes of short stature in children clinically diagnosed with GH deficiency (GHD) and assess genotype-phenotype correlations.
Methods: A retrospective single-center study was conducted including 233 children with clinically diagnosed primary GHD treated with GH for 5 years or more. Genetic testing was performed using a targeted next-generation sequencing panel of 398 growth-associated genes.
Results: A genetic cause was identified in 39 of 233 (17%) children. Only 13 of 39 (33%) findings confirmed GHD (genes CHD7, GH1, GHSR, GLI2, GNAO1, KMT2D, OTX2 [3], POU1F1, PROP1, SALL4, TBX3). The remaining 26 of 39 (67%) revealed alternative etiologies of growth failure: RASopathies (13/39; genes NF1 [2], PTPN11 [7], RAF1, SOS1 [2], SPRED1), growth plate disorders (8/39; genes ACAN, COL2A1, EXT2, FGFR3 [2], NPR2 [3]), and miscellaneous conditions (5/39; genes CDC42, LMNA, HMGA2, PMM2, RAI1). Genetically confirmed GHD patients presented with lower peak GH (median 1.8 vs 4.8 [alternative genetic etiology] and 5.9 μg/L [no genetic etiology]; P = .017), more frequent combined pituitary hormone deficiency (46% vs 4% and 12%; P = .001) and magnetic resonance imaging midbrain abnormalities (73% vs 14% vs 32%; P = .003). Conversely, the alternative etiology group demonstrated the least robust 5-year GH therapy response (median height gain 1.4 vs 2.3 [GHD group] and 1.8 [no genetic etiology]; P = .001).
Conclusion: The population of children clinically diagnosed with GHD is genetically heterogeneous. A statistically significant proportion harbors defects in RAS-MAPK signaling or growth plate disorders, highlighting the limitations of current methods of GHD diagnostics.