The Top 100 Endoscopic Spine Surgery Publications: An Updated Bibliometric Review.

IF 1.9 4区医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

Clinical Spine Surgery Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-11 DOI:10.1097/BSD.0000000000002094

Leonide Toussaint Iv, Andrew Lewis, Jonathan DeLeon, Connor Carpenter, Sudha Ramakrishnan, Ioannis Avramis, Joseph Chavarria, James Rizkalla

{"title":"The Top 100 Endoscopic Spine Surgery Publications: An Updated Bibliometric Review.","authors":"Leonide Toussaint Iv, Andrew Lewis, Jonathan DeLeon, Connor Carpenter, Sudha Ramakrishnan, Ioannis Avramis, Joseph Chavarria, James Rizkalla","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000002094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To identify the current top 100 most-cited publications on endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) and analyze emerging trends from the past 5 years.Methods: A 2-step process was used to identify the top 100 most-cited articles. Eight key phrases commonly used in ESS research were utilized to collect relevant articles from 3 research databases. The list from each database was arranged by number of citations and compared with determine the top 100 most-cited publications in ESS.Results: The top 100 most-cited publications had a minimum of 94 citations and a maximum of 648. Most of the articles were published after 2006, and nearly one-third were published in Spine . South Korea, the United States, and Germany were the biggest contributors.Conclusion: During the past 5 years, research productivity has increased exponentially. The updated list demonstrates emerging trends within the field, including changing levels of engagement from different countries and authors, along with new techniques and pathologies.Clinical relevance: This analysis highlights the most influential research shaping current practices in ESS, offering clinicians insight into evolving surgical techniques, outcomes, and global contributions. Understanding these trends can guide evidence-based decisions and promote the adoption of innovative and minimally invasive approaches.","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"309-318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000002094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To identify the current top 100 most-cited publications on endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) and analyze emerging trends from the past 5 years.

Methods: A 2-step process was used to identify the top 100 most-cited articles. Eight key phrases commonly used in ESS research were utilized to collect relevant articles from 3 research databases. The list from each database was arranged by number of citations and compared with determine the top 100 most-cited publications in ESS.

Results: The top 100 most-cited publications had a minimum of 94 citations and a maximum of 648. Most of the articles were published after 2006, and nearly one-third were published in Spine . South Korea, the United States, and Germany were the biggest contributors.

Conclusion: During the past 5 years, research productivity has increased exponentially. The updated list demonstrates emerging trends within the field, including changing levels of engagement from different countries and authors, along with new techniques and pathologies.

Clinical relevance: This analysis highlights the most influential research shaping current practices in ESS, offering clinicians insight into evolving surgical techniques, outcomes, and global contributions. Understanding these trends can guide evidence-based decisions and promote the adoption of innovative and minimally invasive approaches.

查看原文本刊更多论文

前100名内窥镜脊柱外科出版物：最新文献计量回顾。

背景：确定当前前100位被引用最多的内窥镜脊柱外科（ESS）出版物，并分析过去5年的新趋势。方法：采用两步法确定前100篇被引文章。利用ESS研究中常用的8个关键词，从3个研究数据库中收集相关文章。每个数据库的列表按引用次数排序，并与ESS中被引用次数最多的前100个出版物进行比较。结果：前100位文献被引次数最少94次，最多648次。大部分文章发表于2006年以后，近三分之一的文章发表在《脊柱》杂志上。韩国、美国和德国是最大的捐助国。结论：在过去的5年中，科研生产力呈指数级增长。更新后的清单显示了该领域的新趋势，包括不同国家和作者参与程度的变化，以及新的技术和病理。临床相关性：本分析突出了影响ESS当前实践的最具影响力的研究，为临床医生提供了对不断发展的外科技术、结果和全球贡献的见解。了解这些趋势可以指导基于证据的决策，并促进采用创新和微创方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

5.30%

发文量

236

期刊介绍： Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.