Visual Impairment and Driving in Older Adults: A Narrative Review.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Current Treatment Options in Neurology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-22 DOI:10.1007/s11940-026-00871-z
Shu Xu, Joshua R Ehrlich, Lindsey B De Lott
{"title":"Visual Impairment and Driving in Older Adults: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Shu Xu, Joshua R Ehrlich, Lindsey B De Lott","doi":"10.1007/s11940-026-00871-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the relationship between visual impairment and driving safety in older adults, with a focus on the visual functions required for safe driving, the impact of common visual deficits, and current approaches to clinical evaluation and management.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies have strengthened evidence that visual functions beyond high contrast visual acuity--particularly visual field sensitivity, contrast sensitivity, and visual processing speed--are associated with driving performance and crash risk. Emerging studies also highlight the role of higher-order visuospatial processing and the integration of visual input with cognitive, multisensory, and motor systems. Advances in functional assessment tools and in-vehicle technologies, such as advanced driver-assistance systems, may further enhance evaluation and support driving safety.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Driving safety in older adults with visual impairment is multifactorial and cannot be adequately assessed by a single visual measure. A multidomain approach incorporating visual, cognitive, and functional assessment is essential for clinical decision-making. Management should emphasize treatment of reversible conditions, patient-centered counseling, and referral for functional driving evaluation when appropriate. Future research should focus on developing functionally relevant, real-world measures to better guide clinical practice and policy.</p><p><strong>Opinion statement: </strong>Driving is a visually intensive activity that plays a central role in maintaining independence, mobility, and social participation for older adults. As global populations age, the number of older drivers is increasing, making safe mobility an important public health concern. Visual impairment is common in later life and may arise from both ocular disease and neurologic conditions affecting the visual pathways or higher-order visual processing. Although driver licensing systems worldwide rely heavily on visual acuity thresholds to determine visual fitness to drive, growing evidence indicates that visual acuity alone provides an incomplete assessment of driving safety. Safe driving depends on the coordinated function of multiple visual domains, including central vision, peripheral vision, contrast sensitivity, motion and depth perception, visual processing speed, and higher-order visuospatial processing. Impairments in these domains may compromise hazard detection, situational awareness, and timely responses to changing traffic conditions, even when central visual acuity remains relatively preserved. In addition, driving performance requires integration of visual input with cognitive, multisensory, and motor systems, which may be affected by neurologic disease and age-related changes in sensory processing. Clinical evaluation of older drivers with visual impairment should therefore extend beyond visual acuity to incorporate multidomain assessment of visual and neurologic function when concerns arise. Management strategies should prioritize treatment of reversible visual conditions, patient counseling regarding adaptive driving behaviors, and referral for functional driving evaluation when appropriate. Ultimately, decisions regarding driving must balance preservation of independence with public safety. Continued research is needed to develop evidence-based screening strategies and policies that better reflect the complex visual demands of real-world driving.</p>","PeriodicalId":10975,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Neurology","volume":"28 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13194245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Treatment Options in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-026-00871-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the relationship between visual impairment and driving safety in older adults, with a focus on the visual functions required for safe driving, the impact of common visual deficits, and current approaches to clinical evaluation and management.

Recent findings: Recent studies have strengthened evidence that visual functions beyond high contrast visual acuity--particularly visual field sensitivity, contrast sensitivity, and visual processing speed--are associated with driving performance and crash risk. Emerging studies also highlight the role of higher-order visuospatial processing and the integration of visual input with cognitive, multisensory, and motor systems. Advances in functional assessment tools and in-vehicle technologies, such as advanced driver-assistance systems, may further enhance evaluation and support driving safety.

Summary: Driving safety in older adults with visual impairment is multifactorial and cannot be adequately assessed by a single visual measure. A multidomain approach incorporating visual, cognitive, and functional assessment is essential for clinical decision-making. Management should emphasize treatment of reversible conditions, patient-centered counseling, and referral for functional driving evaluation when appropriate. Future research should focus on developing functionally relevant, real-world measures to better guide clinical practice and policy.

Opinion statement: Driving is a visually intensive activity that plays a central role in maintaining independence, mobility, and social participation for older adults. As global populations age, the number of older drivers is increasing, making safe mobility an important public health concern. Visual impairment is common in later life and may arise from both ocular disease and neurologic conditions affecting the visual pathways or higher-order visual processing. Although driver licensing systems worldwide rely heavily on visual acuity thresholds to determine visual fitness to drive, growing evidence indicates that visual acuity alone provides an incomplete assessment of driving safety. Safe driving depends on the coordinated function of multiple visual domains, including central vision, peripheral vision, contrast sensitivity, motion and depth perception, visual processing speed, and higher-order visuospatial processing. Impairments in these domains may compromise hazard detection, situational awareness, and timely responses to changing traffic conditions, even when central visual acuity remains relatively preserved. In addition, driving performance requires integration of visual input with cognitive, multisensory, and motor systems, which may be affected by neurologic disease and age-related changes in sensory processing. Clinical evaluation of older drivers with visual impairment should therefore extend beyond visual acuity to incorporate multidomain assessment of visual and neurologic function when concerns arise. Management strategies should prioritize treatment of reversible visual conditions, patient counseling regarding adaptive driving behaviors, and referral for functional driving evaluation when appropriate. Ultimately, decisions regarding driving must balance preservation of independence with public safety. Continued research is needed to develop evidence-based screening strategies and policies that better reflect the complex visual demands of real-world driving.

老年人的视觉障碍和驾驶:一个叙述性的回顾。
综述目的:这篇叙述性综述综合了目前有关老年人视力障碍与驾驶安全之间关系的证据,重点关注安全驾驶所需的视觉功能、常见视力缺陷的影响以及目前临床评估和管理的方法。最近的发现:最近的研究强化了高对比视觉灵敏度以外的视觉功能——特别是视野灵敏度、对比灵敏度和视觉处理速度——与驾驶性能和碰撞风险有关的证据。新兴研究还强调了高阶视觉空间处理的作用,以及视觉输入与认知、多感觉和运动系统的整合。功能评估工具和车载技术的进步,如先进的驾驶员辅助系统,可以进一步加强评估和支持驾驶安全。总结:视力受损的老年人的驾驶安全是多因素的,不能通过单一的视觉测量来充分评估。结合视觉、认知和功能评估的多领域方法对临床决策至关重要。管理应强调可逆性疾病的治疗,以患者为中心的咨询,并在适当的时候转诊进行功能驱动评估。未来的研究应侧重于开发功能相关的、现实世界的措施,以更好地指导临床实践和政策。意见声明:驾驶是一项视觉密集型活动,在保持老年人的独立性、流动性和社会参与方面发挥着核心作用。随着全球人口老龄化,老年司机的数量正在增加,这使得安全出行成为一个重要的公共卫生问题。视力障碍在老年生活中很常见,可能由眼部疾病和影响视觉通路或高阶视觉处理的神经系统疾病引起。尽管世界各地的驾驶执照制度在很大程度上依赖于视敏度阈值来确定是否适合驾驶,但越来越多的证据表明,仅凭视敏度来评估驾驶安全是不完整的。安全驾驶依赖于多个视觉域的协调功能,包括中央视觉、周边视觉、对比敏感度、运动和深度感知、视觉处理速度和高阶视觉空间处理。这些区域的损伤可能会影响危险检测、态势感知和对不断变化的交通状况的及时反应,即使在中央视力相对保持不变的情况下也是如此。此外,驾驶表现需要视觉输入与认知、多感觉和运动系统的整合,这可能受到神经疾病和与年龄相关的感觉处理变化的影响。因此,对有视力障碍的老年司机的临床评估应超越视力,在出现问题时纳入视觉和神经功能的多领域评估。管理策略应优先考虑可逆性视力状况的治疗,对适应性驾驶行为的患者进行咨询,并在适当时转诊进行功能性驾驶评估。最终,有关驾驶的决定必须在维护独立性和公共安全之间取得平衡。需要继续研究以制定基于证据的筛查策略和政策,以更好地反映现实驾驶中复杂的视觉需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published treatment option advances in the field of neurology. By presenting clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to facilitate worldwide approaches to the treatment of neurologic conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as epilepsy, headache, neurologic ophthalmology and otology, neuromuscular disorders, psychiatric manifestations of neurologic disease, and sleep disorders. Section Editors select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known neurologists, and an international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书