{"title":"Mobilize: The Analytics and Politics of Indigenous Movement","authors":"Michelle Daigle","doi":"10.1111/anti.70142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Indigenous scholars have extensively theorized the centrality of place-making and land relations in examining the workings of colonialism and the underpinnings of Indigenous futurities. In this essay, I examine the analytics and politics of Indigenous mobilities and how this expands on conceptions of Indigeneity while affirming that movement does not preclude belongings and claims to their ancestral lands. Drawing on works from critical Indigenous Studies and mobilities scholarship, I build a dialogue with Anishinaabe/French artist Caroline Monnet's work to examine how Indigenous (im)mobilities are entangled with coloniality, but more importantly, how agentive movement refuses essentialist conceptions of Indigeneity and opens possibilities for envisioning alternative futurities. I conclude by considering what Monnet calls the double meaning of movement as a call to political movement building. Specifically, I consider how mobilities elucidate connection across Indigenous peoples, as well as affinities with other colonized peoples, and how movement offers conceptual and methodological tools to conceive of Indigenous futurities in relational modes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8241,"journal":{"name":"Antipode","volume":"58 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anti.70142","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antipode","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anti.70142","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Indigenous scholars have extensively theorized the centrality of place-making and land relations in examining the workings of colonialism and the underpinnings of Indigenous futurities. In this essay, I examine the analytics and politics of Indigenous mobilities and how this expands on conceptions of Indigeneity while affirming that movement does not preclude belongings and claims to their ancestral lands. Drawing on works from critical Indigenous Studies and mobilities scholarship, I build a dialogue with Anishinaabe/French artist Caroline Monnet's work to examine how Indigenous (im)mobilities are entangled with coloniality, but more importantly, how agentive movement refuses essentialist conceptions of Indigeneity and opens possibilities for envisioning alternative futurities. I conclude by considering what Monnet calls the double meaning of movement as a call to political movement building. Specifically, I consider how mobilities elucidate connection across Indigenous peoples, as well as affinities with other colonized peoples, and how movement offers conceptual and methodological tools to conceive of Indigenous futurities in relational modes.
期刊介绍:
Antipode has published dissenting scholarship that explores and utilizes key geographical ideas like space, scale, place, borders and landscape. It aims to challenge dominant and orthodox views of the world through debate, scholarship and politically-committed research, creating new spaces and envisioning new futures. Antipode welcomes the infusion of new ideas and the shaking up of old positions, without being committed to just one view of radical analysis or politics.