Comparative effectiveness of intra-articular corticosteroid injection and radiofrequency ablation for advanced hip osteoarthritis: A retrospective cohort study.

Gülçin Babaoğlu, Tolga Kaplan, Ülkü Sabuncu, Şükriye Dadalı, Ali Çoştu, Şaziye Şahin, Erkan Yavuz Akçaboy
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of intra-articular corticosteroid injection and radiofrequency ablation for advanced hip osteoarthritis: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Gülçin Babaoğlu, Tolga Kaplan, Ülkü Sabuncu, Şükriye Dadalı, Ali Çoştu, Şaziye Şahin, Erkan Yavuz Akçaboy","doi":"10.5606/agri.2026.82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of intra-articular corticosteroid (IAC) injections versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the femoral and obturator articular branches in patients with advanced hip osteoarthritis (OA).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective cohort study included a total of 93 patients including 62 who received IAC and 31 who received RFA between January 2022 and May 2025. Pain severity (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS), clinical improvement (Global Perceived Effect, GPE), and analgesic use were evaluated at baseline, one month, and six months. Longitudinal changes were analyzed using the Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and opioid use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 93 patients included in the study, 17 were male and 76 were female with a mean age of 66.8±12.3 (range, 27 to 89). Both groups exhibited significant reductions in NRS scores at one and six months compared to baseline (p < 0.001). No significant inter-group differences were observed in absolute NRS scores or the proportion of patients achieving a good clinical response (GPE ≥ 6). At six months, the RFA group demonstrated numerically greater improvement; however, differences in absolute (median 2.0 vs. 0.0; p = 0.052) and percentage change (median 25.0% vs. 0.0%; p = 0.054) did not reach statistical significance. Longitudinal analyses using GEE confirmed a significant main effect of time, with no treatment group effect or group-by-time interaction after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and baseline opioid use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both IAC and RFA provide meaningful and comparable pain relief in patients with refractory hip OA. While the analgesic effect of IAC injections appears to diminish by the sixth month, RFA may offer a safe alternative with a potentially more sustained clinical trajectory.</p>","PeriodicalId":101341,"journal":{"name":"Agri : Agri (Algoloji) Dernegi'nin Yayin organidir = The journal of the Turkish Society of Algology","volume":"38 2","pages":"119-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agri : Agri (Algoloji) Dernegi'nin Yayin organidir = The journal of the Turkish Society of Algology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/agri.2026.82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of intra-articular corticosteroid (IAC) injections versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the femoral and obturator articular branches in patients with advanced hip osteoarthritis (OA).

Patients and methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included a total of 93 patients including 62 who received IAC and 31 who received RFA between January 2022 and May 2025. Pain severity (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS), clinical improvement (Global Perceived Effect, GPE), and analgesic use were evaluated at baseline, one month, and six months. Longitudinal changes were analyzed using the Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and opioid use.

Results: Of a total of 93 patients included in the study, 17 were male and 76 were female with a mean age of 66.8±12.3 (range, 27 to 89). Both groups exhibited significant reductions in NRS scores at one and six months compared to baseline (p < 0.001). No significant inter-group differences were observed in absolute NRS scores or the proportion of patients achieving a good clinical response (GPE ≥ 6). At six months, the RFA group demonstrated numerically greater improvement; however, differences in absolute (median 2.0 vs. 0.0; p = 0.052) and percentage change (median 25.0% vs. 0.0%; p = 0.054) did not reach statistical significance. Longitudinal analyses using GEE confirmed a significant main effect of time, with no treatment group effect or group-by-time interaction after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and baseline opioid use.

Conclusion: Both IAC and RFA provide meaningful and comparable pain relief in patients with refractory hip OA. While the analgesic effect of IAC injections appears to diminish by the sixth month, RFA may offer a safe alternative with a potentially more sustained clinical trajectory.

关节内皮质类固醇注射和射频消融术治疗晚期髋关节骨关节炎的比较疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:本研究旨在比较晚期髋关节骨关节炎(OA)患者关节内皮质类固醇(IAC)注射与股骨和闭孔关节分支射频消融(RFA)的临床有效性和安全性。患者和方法:这项单中心、回顾性队列研究共纳入了93例患者,其中62例接受了IAC, 31例接受了RFA,时间为2022年1月至2025年5月。在基线、1个月和6个月时评估疼痛严重程度(数字评定量表,NRS)、临床改善(整体感知效果,GPE)和止痛药使用情况。纵向变化分析使用广义估计方程(GEE)调整年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)和阿片类药物使用。结果:纳入研究的93例患者中,男性17例,女性76例,平均年龄66.8±12.3岁(范围27 ~ 89岁)。与基线相比,两组在1个月和6个月时的NRS评分均显著降低(p < 0.001)。在绝对NRS评分或获得良好临床反应(GPE≥6)的患者比例方面,组间无显著差异。在6个月时,RFA组表现出更大的数字改善;然而,绝对值(中位数2.0 vs. 0.0, p = 0.052)和百分比变化(中位数25.0% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.054)的差异没有达到统计学意义。使用GEE的纵向分析证实了时间的显著主要影响,在调整年龄、性别、BMI和基线阿片类药物使用后,没有治疗组效应或组间时间相互作用。结论:对于难治性髋关节炎患者,IAC和RFA均能有效缓解疼痛。虽然IAC注射的镇痛效果似乎在第六个月时减弱,但RFA可能提供一种安全的替代方案,具有潜在的更持久的临床轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书