Clin-STAR Corner: Practice Changing Advances at the Interface of Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning and Geriatrics

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Pub Date : 2026-09-19 Epub Date: 2026-05-23 DOI:10.1111/jgs.70527
Tue T. Te, Alex A. T. Bui, William Speier, Constance H. Fung
{"title":"Clin-STAR Corner: Practice Changing Advances at the Interface of Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning and Geriatrics","authors":"Tue T. Te,&nbsp;Alex A. T. Bui,&nbsp;William Speier,&nbsp;Constance H. Fung","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) methods, including machine learning (ML), are transforming healthcare by enabling personalized interventions that integrate multimodal data to support rehabilitation, preventive care, and remote monitoring. Despite their broad potential, older adults remain underrepresented in model development, raising concerns about bias and limited generalizability. As AI/ML adoption expands, it is essential to critically appraise emerging tools to ensure ethical, equitable, person-centered implementation in aging populations and long-term randomized evaluations. A structured MEDLINE search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 2023 and December 2025 that evaluated AI/ML-based interventions in adults ≥ 65 years. Of 31 records identified, 19 underwent abstract screening, seven underwent full-text assessment, and four articles were identified as meeting all criteria for inclusion, which focused on scalability, clinical impact, and methodological rigor. Across postoperative rehabilitation and preventive care, AI/ML interventions demonstrated meaningful clinical benefits. Transformative applications of AI/ML described robotic systems quantifying weight-bearing, algorithm-guided paired rehabilitation interventions, paired exercises in geriatric hip fracture rehabilitation, smartphone platforms delivering continuously personalized exercise programs, and conversational chatbots providing tailored vaccine counseling. The included RCTs show that AI-driven interventions can enhance physical recovery, support psychosocial well-being, and improve uptake of preventive measures compared with conventional approaches. Key considerations for future implementation include digital health literacy, long-term follow-up, and potential bias arising from healthier or more motivated study populations. As evidence grows, geriatric innovation must prioritize safety, ethics, and equitable access to ensure that technological precision enhances, rather than replaces, person-centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 9","pages":"2501-2510"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.70527","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.70527","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) methods, including machine learning (ML), are transforming healthcare by enabling personalized interventions that integrate multimodal data to support rehabilitation, preventive care, and remote monitoring. Despite their broad potential, older adults remain underrepresented in model development, raising concerns about bias and limited generalizability. As AI/ML adoption expands, it is essential to critically appraise emerging tools to ensure ethical, equitable, person-centered implementation in aging populations and long-term randomized evaluations. A structured MEDLINE search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 2023 and December 2025 that evaluated AI/ML-based interventions in adults ≥ 65 years. Of 31 records identified, 19 underwent abstract screening, seven underwent full-text assessment, and four articles were identified as meeting all criteria for inclusion, which focused on scalability, clinical impact, and methodological rigor. Across postoperative rehabilitation and preventive care, AI/ML interventions demonstrated meaningful clinical benefits. Transformative applications of AI/ML described robotic systems quantifying weight-bearing, algorithm-guided paired rehabilitation interventions, paired exercises in geriatric hip fracture rehabilitation, smartphone platforms delivering continuously personalized exercise programs, and conversational chatbots providing tailored vaccine counseling. The included RCTs show that AI-driven interventions can enhance physical recovery, support psychosocial well-being, and improve uptake of preventive measures compared with conventional approaches. Key considerations for future implementation include digital health literacy, long-term follow-up, and potential bias arising from healthier or more motivated study populations. As evidence grows, geriatric innovation must prioritize safety, ethics, and equitable access to ensure that technological precision enhances, rather than replaces, person-centered care.

clint - star角:人工智能/机器学习和老年病学界面的实践改变进展。
人工智能(AI)方法,包括机器学习(ML),正在通过集成多模式数据的个性化干预来改变医疗保健,以支持康复、预防护理和远程监控。尽管他们具有广泛的潜力,但老年人在模型开发中的代表性仍然不足,这引起了对偏见和有限的普遍性的担忧。随着人工智能/机器学习应用的扩大,必须严格评估新兴工具,以确保在老龄化人口和长期随机评估中实现道德、公平、以人为本的实施。一项结构化的MEDLINE搜索确定了2023年1月至2025年12月发表的随机对照试验(rct),这些试验评估了≥65岁成人中基于AI/ ml的干预措施。在确定的31条记录中,19条进行了摘要筛选,7条进行了全文评估,4篇文章被确定为符合所有纳入标准,重点是可扩展性、临床影响和方法严密性。在术后康复和预防护理中,人工智能/机器学习干预显示出有意义的临床益处。AI/ML的革命性应用描述了量化负重的机器人系统、算法引导的配对康复干预、老年髋部骨折康复中的配对锻炼、提供持续个性化锻炼计划的智能手机平台,以及提供量身定制疫苗咨询的会话聊天机器人。纳入的随机对照试验表明,与传统方法相比,人工智能驱动的干预措施可以促进身体恢复,支持社会心理健康,并改善预防措施的采用。未来实施的关键考虑因素包括数字健康素养、长期随访以及更健康或更积极的研究人群可能产生的偏见。随着证据的增加,老年医学创新必须优先考虑安全、伦理和公平获取,以确保技术精确性增强而不是取代以人为本的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书