Statistical models for predicting Edgerton-Danhauer NST scores from pure-tone thresholds.

The Journal of auditory research Pub Date : 1986-07-01
J L Danhauer, T L Sahley, C Abdala
{"title":"Statistical models for predicting Edgerton-Danhauer NST scores from pure-tone thresholds.","authors":"J L Danhauer,&nbsp;T L Sahley,&nbsp;C Abdala","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pure-tone thresholds (PTTs) and phonemic-scored responses to the Edgerton and Danhauer (1979) Nonsense Syllable Test (NST) at 25, 35, 45, and 55 db SL re each S's SRT, were taken from 97 Ss of 4 earlier studies of Danhauer and colleagues. All studies had used the same stimuli and procedures. Among the 97 Ss were heterogeneous subpopulations of normally-hearing and sensorineural hearing-impaired Ss, aged 6-81 yrs. PTTs at octaves from .25-8 kc/s, singly and in various weighted combinations, were explored by step-wise multiple linear regression analyses for the best equation to predict an individual's NST score at each SL. Included were the two weighted PTT averages (over .5, 1, and 2 kc/s) proposed by Butts, Schoney and Ruth (Asha, 1984, 26, 64). PTT2 kc/s was the single most predictive datum. The most predictive equation at one NST SL was not necessarily the best at another SL. At each NST SL, the most predictive equation was always one or other of the equations of Butts et al, and at the higher levels the best equations incorporated in addition certain weighted PTTs at .5 and 1 kc/s. The results indicated that it is possible to predict a S's NST scores from PTTs with reasonable accuracy: from 86-91% of Ss' NST scores were predicted within +/- 10%. Further validation and refinement of these models on larger and different subject samples may result in equations predicting NST scores from PTTs with those difficult-to-test patients in whom speech recognition capacity cannot well be tested directly.</p>","PeriodicalId":76646,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of auditory research","volume":"26 3","pages":"167-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of auditory research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pure-tone thresholds (PTTs) and phonemic-scored responses to the Edgerton and Danhauer (1979) Nonsense Syllable Test (NST) at 25, 35, 45, and 55 db SL re each S's SRT, were taken from 97 Ss of 4 earlier studies of Danhauer and colleagues. All studies had used the same stimuli and procedures. Among the 97 Ss were heterogeneous subpopulations of normally-hearing and sensorineural hearing-impaired Ss, aged 6-81 yrs. PTTs at octaves from .25-8 kc/s, singly and in various weighted combinations, were explored by step-wise multiple linear regression analyses for the best equation to predict an individual's NST score at each SL. Included were the two weighted PTT averages (over .5, 1, and 2 kc/s) proposed by Butts, Schoney and Ruth (Asha, 1984, 26, 64). PTT2 kc/s was the single most predictive datum. The most predictive equation at one NST SL was not necessarily the best at another SL. At each NST SL, the most predictive equation was always one or other of the equations of Butts et al, and at the higher levels the best equations incorporated in addition certain weighted PTTs at .5 and 1 kc/s. The results indicated that it is possible to predict a S's NST scores from PTTs with reasonable accuracy: from 86-91% of Ss' NST scores were predicted within +/- 10%. Further validation and refinement of these models on larger and different subject samples may result in equations predicting NST scores from PTTs with those difficult-to-test patients in whom speech recognition capacity cannot well be tested directly.

从纯音阈值预测Edgerton-Danhauer NST分数的统计模型。
Edgerton和Danhauer(1979)的无意义音节测试(NST)在每个S的SRT的25、35、45和55 db时的纯音阈值(PTTs)和音位得分反应,来自Danhauer及其同事的4个早期研究的97个S。所有的研究都使用了相同的刺激和程序。97名老年人中有正常听力和感音神经性听力受损的异质性亚群,年龄在6-81岁之间。通过逐步多元线性回归分析,在0.25 -8 kc/s的八度音阶上,单个和各种加权组合的PTT进行了探索,以寻找预测个体在每个SL的NST得分的最佳方程。其中包括Butts, Schoney和Ruth (Asha, 1984, 26,64)提出的两个加权PTT平均值(超过0.5,1和2 kc/s)。PTT2 kc/s是最具预测性的单一基准。在一个NST SL中最具预测性的方程不一定是在另一个NST SL中最具预测性的方程。在每个NST SL中,最具预测性的方程总是Butts等人的方程中的一个或另一个,在更高的水平上,最具预测性的方程还包括0.5和1 kc/s的加权ptt。结果表明,从PTTs中预测学生的NST分数具有合理的准确性:86-91%的学生的NST分数预测在+/- 10%以内。在更大的不同的受试者样本上进一步验证和改进这些模型,可能会得到预测那些语音识别能力无法直接测试的难以测试的患者的ptt的NST分数的方程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信