Female genital mutilation/cutting burden and perceptions among asylum-seeking women in Berlin, Germany: A cross-sectional study

IF 2.8 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Migration and Health Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jmh.2026.100416
M.H. Barghouth , E. Kusi , A. Mueller , M. Kern , N. Bethke , J. Seybold , S. Theuring
{"title":"Female genital mutilation/cutting burden and perceptions among asylum-seeking women in Berlin, Germany: A cross-sectional study","authors":"M.H. Barghouth ,&nbsp;E. Kusi ,&nbsp;A. Mueller ,&nbsp;M. Kern ,&nbsp;N. Bethke ,&nbsp;J. Seybold ,&nbsp;S. Theuring","doi":"10.1016/j.jmh.2026.100416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Germany is a major destination country for asylum-seekers, including from many countries where female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is practiced. Our study aimed to provide empirical data on FGM/C prevalence, associated health complaints and FGM/C-related perceptions among asylum-seeking women in Berlin.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted among asylum-seeking women in Berlin, Germany between October 2018 and September 2022. Adult women self-reporting FGM/C were interviewed using a questionnaire querying FGM/C type, physical complaints, and pain domains, and open-ended questions on women’s experiences regarding FGM/C.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 15,167 women underwent the mandatory medical examination for asylum-seekers during the study period, 1.9% of which self-reported FGM/C. The prevalence reached 18.6% when restricting the population to FGM/C-practicing countries. Women living with FGM/C came predominantly from the African WHO region (61.9%). A total of 151 women consented to being interviewed. The majority (57.0%) self-allocated to FGM/C Type I/II. Menstrual pain was the most reported complaint (77.5%), followed by pain during defecation (29.1%). Most physical complaints were reported by slightly higher proportions among women with FGM/C type III. Women reported a median age of six years at FGM/C execution, which was performed largely by female, non-relatives (64.5%). The majority (90.1%) perceived FGM/C negatively while 7.9% had a neutral or positive attitude towards it due to its cultural significance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>FGM/C is prevalent in host countries like Germany with a potentially associated physical and psychosocial health burden. Our findings emphasize the need for a holistic, culturally sensitive response to such health demands by healthcare systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Migration and Health","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100416"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Migration and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666623526000231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Germany is a major destination country for asylum-seekers, including from many countries where female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is practiced. Our study aimed to provide empirical data on FGM/C prevalence, associated health complaints and FGM/C-related perceptions among asylum-seeking women in Berlin.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among asylum-seeking women in Berlin, Germany between October 2018 and September 2022. Adult women self-reporting FGM/C were interviewed using a questionnaire querying FGM/C type, physical complaints, and pain domains, and open-ended questions on women’s experiences regarding FGM/C.

Results

In total, 15,167 women underwent the mandatory medical examination for asylum-seekers during the study period, 1.9% of which self-reported FGM/C. The prevalence reached 18.6% when restricting the population to FGM/C-practicing countries. Women living with FGM/C came predominantly from the African WHO region (61.9%). A total of 151 women consented to being interviewed. The majority (57.0%) self-allocated to FGM/C Type I/II. Menstrual pain was the most reported complaint (77.5%), followed by pain during defecation (29.1%). Most physical complaints were reported by slightly higher proportions among women with FGM/C type III. Women reported a median age of six years at FGM/C execution, which was performed largely by female, non-relatives (64.5%). The majority (90.1%) perceived FGM/C negatively while 7.9% had a neutral or positive attitude towards it due to its cultural significance.

Conclusion

FGM/C is prevalent in host countries like Germany with a potentially associated physical and psychosocial health burden. Our findings emphasize the need for a holistic, culturally sensitive response to such health demands by healthcare systems.
德国柏林寻求庇护妇女切割女性生殖器官的负担和观念:一项横断面研究
德国是寻求庇护者的主要目的地国,包括来自许多实行女性生殖器切割的国家的寻求庇护者。我们的研究旨在提供有关柏林寻求庇护妇女中女性生殖器切割/切割流行率、相关健康投诉和女性生殖器切割/切割相关观念的经验数据。方法对2018年10月至2022年9月期间在德国柏林寻求庇护的妇女进行横断面研究。对自述遭受过女性生殖器切割的成年女性进行了问卷调查,问卷内容包括女性生殖器切割类型、身体疾患和疼痛范围,以及关于女性生殖器切割经历的开放式问题。结果在研究期间,总共有15 167名妇女接受了寻求庇护者的强制性体检,其中1.9%的人自报接受了女性生殖器切割/残割。当将人口限制在实行女性生殖器切割/割礼的国家时,患病率达到18.6%。残割女性生殖器官的妇女主要来自世卫组织非洲区域(61.9%)。共有151名妇女同意接受采访。大多数(57.0%)自我分配为I/II型女性生殖器切割/C。经期疼痛是报告最多的主诉(77.5%),其次是排便疼痛(29.1%)。在III型切割女性生殖器官的妇女中,报告的大多数身体疾病的比例略高。妇女报告称,切割/切割女性生殖器官时的中位年龄为6岁,主要由非亲属的女性实施(64.5%)。大多数人(90.1%)对女性生殖器切割持负面态度,而7.9%的人由于其文化意义对其持中立或积极态度。结论女性生殖器切割在德国等东道国普遍存在,可能带来相关的身体和心理健康负担。我们的研究结果强调需要一个整体的,文化敏感的反应,这样的卫生保健系统的健康需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Migration and Health
Journal of Migration and Health Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
65
审稿时长
153 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书