Carbon footprint of a clinical biochemistry platform in a French university hospital: Identifying the main greenhouse gas emission sources

IF 4.5
Klinguer Cécile , de Viry Margaux , Rimlinger Florence , Leroy Chrystel , Borderie Didier , Chenevier-Gobeaux Camille
{"title":"Carbon footprint of a clinical biochemistry platform in a French university hospital: Identifying the main greenhouse gas emission sources","authors":"Klinguer Cécile ,&nbsp;de Viry Margaux ,&nbsp;Rimlinger Florence ,&nbsp;Leroy Chrystel ,&nbsp;Borderie Didier ,&nbsp;Chenevier-Gobeaux Camille","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2026.100686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The healthcare sector is a significant contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, accounting for approximately 8% in France. Clinical biochemistry laboratories, crucial for patient diagnosis and therapeutic follow-up, are particularly resource-intensive and the laboratory consumables represent the second biggest emission source in Parisian public hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We aimed to quantify the carbon footprint of the centralized analytical automated platform of the clinical biochemistry laboratory at Cochin Hospital in Paris, covering most of the incoming and outgoing physical flows based on actual operational data. Wherever possible, physical emission factors were used to assess the emissions associated with laboratory activities. For laboratory consumables, monetary emission factors were applied due to the lack of available data.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The carbon footprint assessment revealed that the laboratory's COBAS® automated analytical lines emitted 2081 tCO₂e in 2023, equivalent to approximately 0.52 kgCO₂e per test. The study found that laboratory consumables accounted for nearly 80% of total emissions. A comparison with other studies showed similar orders of magnitude though it highlighted methodological differences affecting the results. The analysis by analytical module revealed significant variations in emissions, with the immunoassay module having the highest footprint per test (2.89 kgCO₂e/test), primarily driven by expensive laboratory consumables.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Our study provides valuable insights into the GHG emissions of a centralized analytical automated platform and suggests that decarbonization efforts should focus on reducing consumable waste and promoting appropriate test ordering practices. Further research is needed to estimate emissions associated with specific tests and incorporate sample collection and transport emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 100686"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of climate change and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278226000416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The healthcare sector is a significant contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, accounting for approximately 8% in France. Clinical biochemistry laboratories, crucial for patient diagnosis and therapeutic follow-up, are particularly resource-intensive and the laboratory consumables represent the second biggest emission source in Parisian public hospitals.

Methods

We aimed to quantify the carbon footprint of the centralized analytical automated platform of the clinical biochemistry laboratory at Cochin Hospital in Paris, covering most of the incoming and outgoing physical flows based on actual operational data. Wherever possible, physical emission factors were used to assess the emissions associated with laboratory activities. For laboratory consumables, monetary emission factors were applied due to the lack of available data.

Findings

The carbon footprint assessment revealed that the laboratory's COBAS® automated analytical lines emitted 2081 tCO₂e in 2023, equivalent to approximately 0.52 kgCO₂e per test. The study found that laboratory consumables accounted for nearly 80% of total emissions. A comparison with other studies showed similar orders of magnitude though it highlighted methodological differences affecting the results. The analysis by analytical module revealed significant variations in emissions, with the immunoassay module having the highest footprint per test (2.89 kgCO₂e/test), primarily driven by expensive laboratory consumables.

Interpretation

Our study provides valuable insights into the GHG emissions of a centralized analytical automated platform and suggests that decarbonization efforts should focus on reducing consumable waste and promoting appropriate test ordering practices. Further research is needed to estimate emissions associated with specific tests and incorporate sample collection and transport emissions.
法国某大学医院临床生物化学平台的碳足迹:确定主要温室气体排放源
医疗保健行业是温室气体(GHG)排放的重要贡献者,约占法国温室气体排放的8%。临床生物化学实验室对患者诊断和后续治疗至关重要,它们的资源特别密集,实验室耗材是巴黎公立医院的第二大排放源。方法根据实际操作数据,对巴黎科钦医院临床生化实验室集中分析自动化平台的碳足迹进行量化,该平台涵盖了大部分进出物理流程。尽可能使用物理排放因子来评估与实验室活动有关的排放。对于实验室耗材,由于缺乏可用数据,采用货币排放因子。碳足迹评估显示,实验室的COBAS®自动化分析线在2023年排放了2081 tCO₂e,相当于每次测试约0.52 kgCO₂e。研究发现,实验室耗材占总排放量的近80%。与其他研究的比较显示出类似的数量级,尽管它强调了影响结果的方法差异。分析模块的分析显示了排放量的显着变化,免疫分析模块每次测试的足迹最高(2.89 kgCO₂e/test),主要是由昂贵的实验室耗材驱动的。我们的研究为集中分析自动化平台的温室气体排放提供了有价值的见解,并建议脱碳工作应侧重于减少消耗品浪费和促进适当的测试订购实践。需要进一步研究,以估计与特定测试有关的排放,并纳入样本收集和运输排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The journal of climate change and health
The journal of climate change and health Global and Planetary Change, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书