Biomarkers and bioindicators of genotoxicity assessment of solid waste emissions from India: Insights into mechanisms of its genome instability

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Chibuisi Gideon Alimba , Samuel Oluwasegun Adesida , Deepa Gandhi , Saravanadevi Sivanesan , Kannan Krishnamurthi
{"title":"Biomarkers and bioindicators of genotoxicity assessment of solid waste emissions from India: Insights into mechanisms of its genome instability","authors":"Chibuisi Gideon Alimba ,&nbsp;Samuel Oluwasegun Adesida ,&nbsp;Deepa Gandhi ,&nbsp;Saravanadevi Sivanesan ,&nbsp;Kannan Krishnamurthi","doi":"10.1016/j.mrgentox.2026.503941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>India’s rapid population growth positively correlates with solid waste generation. Indiscriminate disposal in unsanitary landfills is dominant, and releases hazardous contaminants, that pose genotoxic risks to humans and biota. This study evaluated DNA damage and genome instability induced by solid waste emissions of Indian origin. Following PRISMA guidelines, 36 peer-reviewed studies published until 2025 were selected. These studies reported 40 bioindicators and 56 genotoxic biomarkers, with cell lines and comet assay most frequently reported. Significant DNA strand breaks, micronucleus formation, chromosomal aberrations, nuclear abnormalities, and sperm defects in exposed models were consistently reported, often in dose- and time-dependent patterns. Random-effects meta-analysis using pooled standardized mean differences showed significant positive effect sizes for micronucleus and comet endpoints (p ≤ 0.0001), confirming increased genetic damage in exposed groups. Although substantial heterogeneity was observed (I² = 95.73% for micronucleus; 87.66% for comet), the direction of effect remained consistently positive. Risk-of-bias assessment indicated overall moderate to high methodological quality, with common reporting gaps in exposure characterization and blinding procedures. Oxidative stress and ROS generation are dominant drivers of genome instability. Signaling pathways causing DNA adduct, DNA repair impairment, epigenetic dysregulation, and mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis were other mechanisms. Despite strong evidence of somatic and germline genotoxicity, epidemiological data and quantitative exposure assessments remain inadequate. Integrated exposure monitoring, advanced molecular and epigenetic biomarkers, dose–response characterization and long-term population-level biomonitoring are needed to strengthen causal inference and human health risk assessment. Emissions from solid waste facilities in India represent a credible genotoxic hazard warranting improved waste management, and regulatory enforcement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18799,"journal":{"name":"Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis","volume":"912 ","pages":"Article 503941"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383571826000252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

India’s rapid population growth positively correlates with solid waste generation. Indiscriminate disposal in unsanitary landfills is dominant, and releases hazardous contaminants, that pose genotoxic risks to humans and biota. This study evaluated DNA damage and genome instability induced by solid waste emissions of Indian origin. Following PRISMA guidelines, 36 peer-reviewed studies published until 2025 were selected. These studies reported 40 bioindicators and 56 genotoxic biomarkers, with cell lines and comet assay most frequently reported. Significant DNA strand breaks, micronucleus formation, chromosomal aberrations, nuclear abnormalities, and sperm defects in exposed models were consistently reported, often in dose- and time-dependent patterns. Random-effects meta-analysis using pooled standardized mean differences showed significant positive effect sizes for micronucleus and comet endpoints (p ≤ 0.0001), confirming increased genetic damage in exposed groups. Although substantial heterogeneity was observed (I² = 95.73% for micronucleus; 87.66% for comet), the direction of effect remained consistently positive. Risk-of-bias assessment indicated overall moderate to high methodological quality, with common reporting gaps in exposure characterization and blinding procedures. Oxidative stress and ROS generation are dominant drivers of genome instability. Signaling pathways causing DNA adduct, DNA repair impairment, epigenetic dysregulation, and mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis were other mechanisms. Despite strong evidence of somatic and germline genotoxicity, epidemiological data and quantitative exposure assessments remain inadequate. Integrated exposure monitoring, advanced molecular and epigenetic biomarkers, dose–response characterization and long-term population-level biomonitoring are needed to strengthen causal inference and human health risk assessment. Emissions from solid waste facilities in India represent a credible genotoxic hazard warranting improved waste management, and regulatory enforcement.
印度固体废物排放遗传毒性评估的生物标志物和生物指标:对其基因组不稳定性机制的见解
印度人口的快速增长与固体废物的产生呈正相关。在不卫生的垃圾填埋场中任意处置是主要的,并释放有害污染物,对人类和生物群构成遗传毒性风险。本研究评估了来自印度的固体废物排放引起的DNA损伤和基因组不稳定性。按照PRISMA的指导方针,我们选择了36项截至2025年发表的同行评议研究。这些研究报告了40种生物指标和56种基因毒性生物标志物,其中细胞系和彗星试验报道最多。在暴露模型中,显著的DNA链断裂、微核形成、染色体畸变、核异常和精子缺陷一直被报道,通常是剂量和时间依赖的模式。随机效应荟萃分析使用合并的标准化平均差异显示微核和彗星终点的显著正效应大小(p ≤ 0.0001),证实暴露组的遗传损伤增加。尽管观察到大量的异质性(微核的I²= 95.73%,彗星的I²= 87.66%),但效应的方向始终是积极的。偏倚风险评估表明,总体的方法学质量中等至较高,在暴露特征和盲法程序方面存在普遍的报告差距。氧化应激和ROS的产生是基因组不稳定的主要驱动因素。引起DNA加合物、DNA修复损伤、表观遗传失调和线粒体介导的细胞凋亡的信号通路是其他机制。尽管有强有力的证据表明存在体细胞和种系遗传毒性,但流行病学数据和定量暴露评估仍然不足。需要综合暴露监测、先进的分子和表观遗传生物标志物、剂量反应表征和长期人群水平的生物监测来加强因果推断和人类健康风险评估。印度固体废物设施的排放是一种可靠的基因毒性危害,需要改进废物管理和监管执法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
84
审稿时长
105 days
期刊介绍: Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis (MRGTEM) publishes papers advancing knowledge in the field of genetic toxicology. Papers are welcomed in the following areas: New developments in genotoxicity testing of chemical agents (e.g. improvements in methodology of assay systems and interpretation of results). Alternatives to and refinement of the use of animals in genotoxicity testing. Nano-genotoxicology, the study of genotoxicity hazards and risks related to novel man-made nanomaterials. Studies of epigenetic changes in relation to genotoxic effects. The use of structure-activity relationships in predicting genotoxic effects. The isolation and chemical characterization of novel environmental mutagens. The measurement of genotoxic effects in human populations, when accompanied by quantitative measurements of environmental or occupational exposures. The application of novel technologies for assessing the hazard and risks associated with genotoxic substances (e.g. OMICS or other high-throughput approaches to genotoxicity testing). MRGTEM is now accepting submissions for a new section of the journal: Current Topics in Genotoxicity Testing, that will be dedicated to the discussion of current issues relating to design, interpretation and strategic use of genotoxicity tests. This section is envisaged to include discussions relating to the development of new international testing guidelines, but also to wider topics in the field. The evaluation of contrasting or opposing viewpoints is welcomed as long as the presentation is in accordance with the journal''s aims, scope, and policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书