Diagnostic Performance of an Artificial Intelligence Model for Retinal Abnormalities in Primary Health Care: A Real-World Teleophthalmology Study.

IF 2
Alan Cristian Marinho Ferreira, Mariana Abreu Caporali de Freitas, Rosangela Durso Perillo, Carlos Eduardo Menezes Amaral, Alaneir de Fátima Santos
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance of an Artificial Intelligence Model for Retinal Abnormalities in Primary Health Care: A Real-World Teleophthalmology Study.","authors":"Alan Cristian Marinho Ferreira, Mariana Abreu Caporali de Freitas, Rosangela Durso Perillo, Carlos Eduardo Menezes Amaral, Alaneir de Fátima Santos","doi":"10.1177/15305627261454208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Timely access to ophthalmological care is a challenge in primary health care (PHC). Teleophthalmology and artificial intelligence (AI) are tools to expand access, but real-world evidence remains limited. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of an AI model for detecting retinal abnormalities in PHC, analyzing variability across clinical and demographic subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study analyzed 2,158 initial retinal exams, resulting in a final paired sample of 824 retinographies for accuracy analysis. The exams were conducted within a teleophthalmology workflow in the PHC of six municipalities in Minas Gerais, Brazil. A commercial AI model based on a convolutional neural network (Eyer Maps<sup>®</sup>) evaluated the images and was compared with classifications performed by an ophthalmologist, considered the reference standard. Cluster analysis was performed, and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, Cohen's Kappa coefficient, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI model demonstrated almost perfect agreement with the human specialist (Kappa = 0.819; <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the global sample, sensitivity was 83.0%, specificity was 98.0%, positive predictive value was 98.0%, negative predictive value was 86.0%, and AUC was 0.91. Eight distinct clusters were identified, in which the model maintained high specificity (96.0-100.0%), with sensitivity varying only in one specific subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a real-world teleophthalmology context within PHC, AI showed robust diagnostic performance and a high capacity for confirming retinal abnormalities, minimizing unnecessary referrals. The findings reinforce its potential as a supportive tool for organizing ophthalmological care and optimizing assistance workflows in PHC.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"932-939"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15305627261454208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Timely access to ophthalmological care is a challenge in primary health care (PHC). Teleophthalmology and artificial intelligence (AI) are tools to expand access, but real-world evidence remains limited. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of an AI model for detecting retinal abnormalities in PHC, analyzing variability across clinical and demographic subgroups.

Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed 2,158 initial retinal exams, resulting in a final paired sample of 824 retinographies for accuracy analysis. The exams were conducted within a teleophthalmology workflow in the PHC of six municipalities in Minas Gerais, Brazil. A commercial AI model based on a convolutional neural network (Eyer Maps®) evaluated the images and was compared with classifications performed by an ophthalmologist, considered the reference standard. Cluster analysis was performed, and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, Cohen's Kappa coefficient, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated.

Results: The AI model demonstrated almost perfect agreement with the human specialist (Kappa = 0.819; p < 0.001). In the global sample, sensitivity was 83.0%, specificity was 98.0%, positive predictive value was 98.0%, negative predictive value was 86.0%, and AUC was 0.91. Eight distinct clusters were identified, in which the model maintained high specificity (96.0-100.0%), with sensitivity varying only in one specific subgroup.

Conclusions: In a real-world teleophthalmology context within PHC, AI showed robust diagnostic performance and a high capacity for confirming retinal abnormalities, minimizing unnecessary referrals. The findings reinforce its potential as a supportive tool for organizing ophthalmological care and optimizing assistance workflows in PHC.

初级卫生保健中视网膜异常的人工智能模型的诊断性能:一项真实世界的远距眼科研究。
及时获得眼科护理是初级卫生保健(PHC)的一个挑战。远距眼科和人工智能(AI)是扩大可及性的工具,但现实证据仍然有限。本研究评估了人工智能模型在PHC中检测视网膜异常的诊断性能,分析了临床和人口亚组的变异性。方法:本横断面研究分析了2158例初始视网膜检查,得出824例视网膜造影的最终配对样本,以进行准确性分析。这些检查是在巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州六个城市初级保健中心的远程眼科工作流程中进行的。基于卷积神经网络的商业人工智能模型(yer Maps®)评估图像,并与眼科医生进行的分类进行比较,作为参考标准。进行聚类分析,计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值、Cohen’s Kappa系数、受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。结果:人工智能模型与人类专家几乎完全一致(Kappa = 0.819; p < 0.001)。在整个样本中,敏感性为83.0%,特异性为98.0%,阳性预测值为98.0%,阴性预测值为86.0%,AUC为0.91。我们确定了8个不同的聚类,其中模型保持了高特异性(96.0-100.0%),敏感性仅在一个特定的亚组中变化。结论:在现实世界的PHC远程眼科环境中,人工智能显示出强大的诊断性能和确认视网膜异常的高能力,最大限度地减少了不必要的转诊。研究结果加强了它作为组织眼科护理和优化初级保健援助工作流程的支持工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书