Divergent responses of leaf traits to latitudinal gradients in natural and planted forests.

IF 4.8
Forestry research Pub Date : 2026-01-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.48130/forres-0026-0002
Jianxiao Su, Jiali Xu, Mengyao Yu, Jie Gao
{"title":"Divergent responses of leaf traits to latitudinal gradients in natural and planted forests.","authors":"Jianxiao Su, Jiali Xu, Mengyao Yu, Jie Gao","doi":"10.48130/forres-0026-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leaf functional traits are key indicators of plant resource use and environmental adaptation, playing a crucial role in regulating carbon cycling and ecosystem stability. However, how leaf traits respond to latitudinal gradients in natural and planted forests remains insufficiently understood. Based on 482 forest plots across China (105 natural and 377 planted forests) surveyed from 2008 to 2020, latitudinal variation in specific leaf area (SLA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), leaf nitrogen (LN), and leaf phosphorus (LP) were examined using quadratic polynomial fitting, variance partitioning, CatBoost analysis, and structural equation modeling (SEM). Natural and planted forests exhibited marked structural differences: natural forests had higher species richness and high stand diversity, whereas planted forests were structurally simplified, younger, and strongly shaped by management. Planted forests showed pronounced non-monotonic variation along latitude, with SLA and LP peaking at mid-latitudes, whereas natural forests exhibited weaker and more gradual latitudinal changes. Climatic and soil factors jointly dominated trait variation in natural forests, while latitude and stand structure were the primary determinants in planted forests. SEM further revealed that latitude affected leaf traits through indirect pathways mediated by climate, soil, and stand factors, with opposite effects between forest types. Natural forests showed consistent and climate-dominated trait responses, with soil properties mediating these effects in predictable ways, reflecting long-term environmental filtering. In contrast, planted forests exhibited greater short-term environmental plasticity. These findings highlight divergent mechanisms of trait-environment relationships between natural and planted forests and underscore the importance of integrating stand structure and climate matching in planted forests management to enhance ecological resilience and carbon sequestration under global change.</p>","PeriodicalId":520285,"journal":{"name":"Forestry research","volume":"6 ","pages":"e002"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13187777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forestry research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48130/forres-0026-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leaf functional traits are key indicators of plant resource use and environmental adaptation, playing a crucial role in regulating carbon cycling and ecosystem stability. However, how leaf traits respond to latitudinal gradients in natural and planted forests remains insufficiently understood. Based on 482 forest plots across China (105 natural and 377 planted forests) surveyed from 2008 to 2020, latitudinal variation in specific leaf area (SLA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), leaf nitrogen (LN), and leaf phosphorus (LP) were examined using quadratic polynomial fitting, variance partitioning, CatBoost analysis, and structural equation modeling (SEM). Natural and planted forests exhibited marked structural differences: natural forests had higher species richness and high stand diversity, whereas planted forests were structurally simplified, younger, and strongly shaped by management. Planted forests showed pronounced non-monotonic variation along latitude, with SLA and LP peaking at mid-latitudes, whereas natural forests exhibited weaker and more gradual latitudinal changes. Climatic and soil factors jointly dominated trait variation in natural forests, while latitude and stand structure were the primary determinants in planted forests. SEM further revealed that latitude affected leaf traits through indirect pathways mediated by climate, soil, and stand factors, with opposite effects between forest types. Natural forests showed consistent and climate-dominated trait responses, with soil properties mediating these effects in predictable ways, reflecting long-term environmental filtering. In contrast, planted forests exhibited greater short-term environmental plasticity. These findings highlight divergent mechanisms of trait-environment relationships between natural and planted forests and underscore the importance of integrating stand structure and climate matching in planted forests management to enhance ecological resilience and carbon sequestration under global change.

天然林和人工林叶片性状对纬度梯度的差异响应。
叶片功能性状是植物资源利用和环境适应的关键指标,在调节碳循环和生态系统稳定中起着至关重要的作用。然而,在天然林和人工林中,叶片性状对纬度梯度的响应尚不清楚。基于2008 - 2020年对中国482个样地(105个天然林和377个人工林)的调查,采用二次多项式拟合、方差划分、CatBoost分析和结构方程模型(SEM)分析了比叶面积(SLA)、叶干物质含量(LDMC)、叶氮(LN)和叶磷(LP)的纬度变化规律。天然林与人工林在结构上存在显著差异,天然林具有较高的物种丰富度和林分多样性,人工林结构简单、较年轻,受经营影响较大。人工林在纬度上表现出明显的非单调变化,在中纬度地区达到峰值,而天然林在纬度上的变化较弱且较为平缓。气候和土壤因子共同主导天然林性状变异,而纬度和林分结构是人工林性状变异的主要决定因素。SEM进一步揭示,纬度通过气候、土壤和林分因子介导的间接途径影响叶片性状,而不同林种间的影响相反。天然林表现出一致的和气候主导的性状响应,土壤性质以可预测的方式调节这些影响,反映长期的环境过滤。相比之下,人工林表现出更大的短期环境可塑性。这些发现突出了天然林与人工林性状-环境关系的不同机制,强调了在全球变化下,将林分结构与气候匹配结合起来,在人工林管理中提高生态恢复力和碳固存的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书