Robust estimation of the time-dependent reproduction number in the presence of weekend reporting effects.

Isaac Ogi-Gittins, Nicholas Steyn, Alexander R Kaye, Edward M Hill, Robin N Thompson
{"title":"Robust estimation of the time-dependent reproduction number in the presence of weekend reporting effects.","authors":"Isaac Ogi-Gittins, Nicholas Steyn, Alexander R Kaye, Edward M Hill, Robin N Thompson","doi":"10.1186/s44263-026-00280-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During infectious disease outbreaks, changes in pathogen transmissibility are assessed through real-time inference of metrics such as the time-dependent reproduction number (R<sub>t</sub>), which can be estimated from disease incidence data. However, such data are often subject to a \"day-of-the-week effect\" (DOWE), whereby the number of cases on certain days of the week is liable to being under-reported (due to administrative delays) or over-reported (as public health authorities \"catch-up\" on reporting delayed cases). For example, cases occurring at weekends may only be reported during the following week, leading to under-reporting at weekends and over-reporting on weekdays (a weekend reporting effect; WRE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyse simulated datasets, as well as case reports from San Francisco recorded during the 1918 influenza pandemic. We investigate the impacts of WREs on R<sub>t</sub> estimates obtained using two approaches: i) the Cori method (a frequently applied method for estimating R<sub>t</sub> from daily disease incidence time series data); ii) an alternative method, involving aggregating the daily incidence data into weekly values to remove the WRE and applying a previous method (the OG1 method) for inferring R<sub>t</sub> from weekly data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analyses indicate that R<sub>t</sub> estimates obtained from standard approaches such as the Cori method can be affected negatively by WREs. In contrast, since weekly aggregation of daily data can eliminate WREs, the alternative approach generates robust R<sub>t</sub> estimates in the presence of WREs. When aggregating the daily data into weekly values, some information is lost. However, in many scenarios, the negative impact of data aggregation on R<sub>t</sub> inference is outweighed by the benefit of then using data that are not corrupted by a WRE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our research highlights the importance of accounting for DOWEs, such as WREs, when estimating R<sub>t</sub> during infectious disease outbreaks.</p>","PeriodicalId":519903,"journal":{"name":"BMC global and public health","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13195961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC global and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-026-00280-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During infectious disease outbreaks, changes in pathogen transmissibility are assessed through real-time inference of metrics such as the time-dependent reproduction number (Rt), which can be estimated from disease incidence data. However, such data are often subject to a "day-of-the-week effect" (DOWE), whereby the number of cases on certain days of the week is liable to being under-reported (due to administrative delays) or over-reported (as public health authorities "catch-up" on reporting delayed cases). For example, cases occurring at weekends may only be reported during the following week, leading to under-reporting at weekends and over-reporting on weekdays (a weekend reporting effect; WRE).

Methods: We analyse simulated datasets, as well as case reports from San Francisco recorded during the 1918 influenza pandemic. We investigate the impacts of WREs on Rt estimates obtained using two approaches: i) the Cori method (a frequently applied method for estimating Rt from daily disease incidence time series data); ii) an alternative method, involving aggregating the daily incidence data into weekly values to remove the WRE and applying a previous method (the OG1 method) for inferring Rt from weekly data.

Results: Our analyses indicate that Rt estimates obtained from standard approaches such as the Cori method can be affected negatively by WREs. In contrast, since weekly aggregation of daily data can eliminate WREs, the alternative approach generates robust Rt estimates in the presence of WREs. When aggregating the daily data into weekly values, some information is lost. However, in many scenarios, the negative impact of data aggregation on Rt inference is outweighed by the benefit of then using data that are not corrupted by a WRE.

Conclusions: Our research highlights the importance of accounting for DOWEs, such as WREs, when estimating Rt during infectious disease outbreaks.

在周末报告效应存在的情况下,对随时间变化的再现数的稳健估计。
背景:在传染病暴发期间,病原体传播性的变化是通过实时推断指标来评估的,例如可以从疾病发病率数据估计的随时间变化的繁殖数(Rt)。然而,这类数据往往受到“一周中某一天的影响”(DOWE)的影响,即一周中某些日子的病例数可能报告不足(由于行政延误)或报告过多(由于公共卫生当局“追赶”报告延误的病例)。例如,周末发生的病例可能只在下一周报告,导致周末报告不足,工作日报告过多(周末报告效应;WRE)。方法:我们分析了模拟数据集,以及1918年流感大流行期间旧金山记录的病例报告。我们研究了WREs对使用两种方法获得的Rt估计的影响:i) Cori方法(一种常用的从每日疾病发病率时间序列数据估计Rt的方法);ii)一种替代方法,包括将每日发病率数据汇总为每周值以去除WRE,并应用先前的方法(OG1方法)从每周数据推断Rt。结果:我们的分析表明,从标准方法(如Cori方法)获得的Rt估计可能会受到WREs的负面影响。相反,由于每日数据的每周汇总可以消除WREs,替代方法在存在WREs的情况下生成稳健的Rt估计。在将每日数据汇总为每周值时,会丢失一些信息。然而,在许多情况下,数据聚合对Rt推断的负面影响被使用未被WRE破坏的数据的好处所抵消。结论:我们的研究强调了在估计传染病暴发期间的Rt时,考虑到DOWEs(如WREs)的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书