Development and evaluation of artificial intelligence tools to estimate volumetric breast density from processed 2D mammograms.

BJR artificial intelligence Pub Date : 2026-04-28 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/bjrai/ubag009
Sam Ellis, Sandra Gomes, Mark D Halling-Brown, Kenneth C Young, Lucy M Warren
{"title":"Development and evaluation of artificial intelligence tools to estimate volumetric breast density from processed 2D mammograms.","authors":"Sam Ellis, Sandra Gomes, Mark D Halling-Brown, Kenneth C Young, Lucy M Warren","doi":"10.1093/bjrai/ubag009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise for estimating volumetric breast density values from processed, \"for presentation,\" mammograms. However, previous evaluations have typically used small datasets or focused on a single vendor. In this study, we aimed to improve volumetric breast density estimation from processed mammograms for the three main UK vendors with a combination of improved training methods and the utilization of up-to-date data from the large OPTIMAM Mammography Image Database (OMI-DB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Paired processed/unprocessed mammograms were obtained from OMI-DB. Ground-truth, image-level density values were calculated by passing unprocessed images through a commercial density estimation tool. AI tools, comprising feed-forward convolution neural networks, were then trained to reproduce these values from the corresponding processed mammograms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient-level AI predictions for volumetric breast density demonstrated strong correlation with ground-truth values derived from unprocessed image counterparts (<i>r</i> = 0.954-0.976). Models trained on less prevalent manufacturers performed worse (<i>r</i> = 0.954 compared to 0.976 for the most prevalent manufacturer), highlighting the importance of collecting larger training datasets in future. Error levels were higher in patients with dense breasts. Model performance was generally consistent across screening sites but correlated with patient age, possibly due to the correlation of age and breast density.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presented models demonstrated good performance overall and were generally consistent across screening sites.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>The presented AI tools provide a means of estimating breast density from processed mammograms, enabling further research into breast cancer epidemiology and risk where only processed mammograms are available.</p>","PeriodicalId":517427,"journal":{"name":"BJR artificial intelligence","volume":"3 1","pages":"ubag009"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13187629/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJR artificial intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjrai/ubag009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise for estimating volumetric breast density values from processed, "for presentation," mammograms. However, previous evaluations have typically used small datasets or focused on a single vendor. In this study, we aimed to improve volumetric breast density estimation from processed mammograms for the three main UK vendors with a combination of improved training methods and the utilization of up-to-date data from the large OPTIMAM Mammography Image Database (OMI-DB).

Methods: Paired processed/unprocessed mammograms were obtained from OMI-DB. Ground-truth, image-level density values were calculated by passing unprocessed images through a commercial density estimation tool. AI tools, comprising feed-forward convolution neural networks, were then trained to reproduce these values from the corresponding processed mammograms.

Results: Patient-level AI predictions for volumetric breast density demonstrated strong correlation with ground-truth values derived from unprocessed image counterparts (r = 0.954-0.976). Models trained on less prevalent manufacturers performed worse (r = 0.954 compared to 0.976 for the most prevalent manufacturer), highlighting the importance of collecting larger training datasets in future. Error levels were higher in patients with dense breasts. Model performance was generally consistent across screening sites but correlated with patient age, possibly due to the correlation of age and breast density.

Conclusions: The presented models demonstrated good performance overall and were generally consistent across screening sites.

Advances in knowledge: The presented AI tools provide a means of estimating breast density from processed mammograms, enabling further research into breast cancer epidemiology and risk where only processed mammograms are available.

开发和评估人工智能工具,从处理过的二维乳房x光片估计乳房体积密度。
目的:人工智能(AI)已经显示出从经过处理的乳房x光片中估计乳房体积密度值的前景。然而,以前的评估通常使用小数据集或专注于单个供应商。在这项研究中,我们旨在通过改进的培训方法和利用来自大型OPTIMAM乳房摄影图像数据库(OMI-DB)的最新数据,为英国三家主要供应商改进处理后的乳房x线照片的体积乳腺密度估计。方法:配对处理/未处理的乳房x线照片从OMI-DB中获得。通过商业密度估计工具传递未经处理的图像,计算出真实的图像级密度值。然后,由前馈卷积神经网络组成的人工智能工具经过训练,可以从相应处理过的乳房x光片中重现这些值。结果:患者水平的人工智能对乳腺体积密度的预测与未经处理的图像对应的基础真值具有很强的相关性(r = 0.954-0.976)。在不太流行的制造商上训练的模型表现较差(r = 0.954,而最流行的制造商为0.976),这突出了将来收集更大的训练数据集的重要性。乳腺致密患者的误差水平更高。模型的表现在不同的筛查点总体上是一致的,但与患者的年龄相关,可能是由于年龄和乳腺密度的相关性。结论:所提出的模型总体上表现出良好的性能,并且在筛选位点上总体上是一致的。知识的进步:提出的人工智能工具提供了一种从处理过的乳房x光片估计乳房密度的方法,从而能够在只有处理过的乳房x光片可用的情况下进一步研究乳腺癌流行病学和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书