Classification of Speech Sound Disorders in French-Speaking Children.

IF 0.7
Margaret Kehoe
{"title":"Classification of Speech Sound Disorders in French-Speaking Children.","authors":"Margaret Kehoe","doi":"10.1159/000552486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>No study has validated English-based classification systems of speech sound disorders (SSDs) with French-speaking children. This study aimed to determine whether SSDs in French-speaking children could be classified into three groups: motor speech, phonological (or speech delay), and articulation (or speech errors), and whether the phonological group could be further divided into phonological delay, consistent phonological disorder, and inconsistent phonological disorder, as proposed in current classification systems.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants included 59 children with SSD and 40 children with typical development, aged 4 to 8 years. They were administered a battery of tasks that targeted phonological and motor speech aspects of production. Focusing primarily on three motor speech tasks (intra-word variability, diadochokinetic [DDK] rate, and an oral-motor examination), the study examined whether participants exhibited difficulty across all three tasks (consistent with a motor speech disorder), displayed difficulty on the intra-word variability task (inconsistent phonological disorder), or did not exhibit difficulty with any of these three tasks (phonology group). In the case of participants classified in the phonology group, their transcription data were examined to determine whether their errors were usual (phonological delay), unusual (phonological disorder), or restricted to difficulty with /s/ and /r/ (articulation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Categorization using strict criteria was unsuccessful leading to alternative approaches to categorization. Focusing primarily on two tasks, DDK and intra-word variability, there was support for a motor speech group (n = 15), an inconsistent phonological group (n = 18), and a phonological delay group (n = 26). One participant was classified as having an articulation disorder, and no participant was classified as having a consistent phonological disorder.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings with French-speaking children provide mixed support for current SSD classification systems. Results were consistent with alternative categorizations of SSD that posit three groupings (motor speech, inconsistent phonological, and phonological) or with studies that document a continuum of severity on the phonological-motor speech continuum.</p>","PeriodicalId":520626,"journal":{"name":"Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000552486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: No study has validated English-based classification systems of speech sound disorders (SSDs) with French-speaking children. This study aimed to determine whether SSDs in French-speaking children could be classified into three groups: motor speech, phonological (or speech delay), and articulation (or speech errors), and whether the phonological group could be further divided into phonological delay, consistent phonological disorder, and inconsistent phonological disorder, as proposed in current classification systems.

Method: Participants included 59 children with SSD and 40 children with typical development, aged 4 to 8 years. They were administered a battery of tasks that targeted phonological and motor speech aspects of production. Focusing primarily on three motor speech tasks (intra-word variability, diadochokinetic [DDK] rate, and an oral-motor examination), the study examined whether participants exhibited difficulty across all three tasks (consistent with a motor speech disorder), displayed difficulty on the intra-word variability task (inconsistent phonological disorder), or did not exhibit difficulty with any of these three tasks (phonology group). In the case of participants classified in the phonology group, their transcription data were examined to determine whether their errors were usual (phonological delay), unusual (phonological disorder), or restricted to difficulty with /s/ and /r/ (articulation).

Results: Categorization using strict criteria was unsuccessful leading to alternative approaches to categorization. Focusing primarily on two tasks, DDK and intra-word variability, there was support for a motor speech group (n = 15), an inconsistent phonological group (n = 18), and a phonological delay group (n = 26). One participant was classified as having an articulation disorder, and no participant was classified as having a consistent phonological disorder.

Conclusion: Findings with French-speaking children provide mixed support for current SSD classification systems. Results were consistent with alternative categorizations of SSD that posit three groupings (motor speech, inconsistent phonological, and phonological) or with studies that document a continuum of severity on the phonological-motor speech continuum.

法语儿童语音障碍的分类。
目前还没有研究证实以英语为基础的语音障碍(SSD)分类系统对法语儿童的有效性。本研究旨在确定法语儿童的ssd是否可以分为运动言语、语音(或语音延迟)和发音(或语音错误)三组,以及语音组是否可以按照现有的分类系统进一步分为语音延迟、一致语音障碍和不一致语音障碍。方法:纳入59例SSD患儿和40例典型发育(TD)患儿,年龄4 ~ 8岁。他们接受了一系列针对语音和运动语音方面的测试。我们主要关注三个运动语言任务(单词内变异性、双动(DDK)率和口腔运动检查),研究儿童是否在所有三个任务中都表现出困难(与运动语言障碍一致),在单词内变异性测试中表现出困难(不一致音位障碍),或者在这三个任务中没有表现出困难(音位组)。在音系组中,我们检查了他们的转录数据,以确定他们的错误是正常的(语音延迟),不寻常的(语音障碍)还是局限于/s/和/r/的发音困难(发音)。结果:使用严格的分类标准是不成功的,导致分类的替代方法。我们主要关注两项测试,即DDK和词内变异性,发现了对运动言语组(n=15)、不一致语音组(n=18)和语音延迟组(n=26)的支持。一个孩子被归类为有发音障碍,没有一个孩子被归类为有一致的语音障碍。结论:法语儿童的研究结果为当前的SSD分类系统提供了混合支持。结果与SSD的其他分类一致,即假设三组(运动语音,不一致语音,语音)或研究记录语音-运动语音连续体的严重程度连续体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书