Extent of resection in breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a literature review.

IF 1.4
Rey Benjamin Ick Joson, Tessa Ying Zhen Tan, Geok Hoon Lim
{"title":"Extent of resection in breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a literature review.","authors":"Rey Benjamin Ick Joson, Tessa Ying Zhen Tan, Geok Hoon Lim","doi":"10.21037/tbcr-25-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) could cause tumor shrinkage and result in a higher rate of breast conservation. However, the extent of resection in breast conserving surgery (BCS) following NACT remained unclear. We conducted a literature review to determine the extent of resection in BCS after NACT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PubMed search was conducted for relevant articles from 1<sup>st</sup> January 2000 to 15<sup>th</sup> October 2024. Studies which included breast cancer patients who had undergone NACT and BCS were reviewed. We included studies which specifically specify the extent of resection and reported re-excision rates and/or oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>Six studies (171 patients) and 11 studies (2,276 patients) with original and residual tumor resection respectively were reviewed. The average re-excision rates were 6.3% (range, 0-10.3%) and 9.6% (range, 0-19.2%) respectively. Average local recurrence rates were 10.9% (range, 7.7-14%) and 3.5% (range, 0.65-7.6%) after a follow-up of 44 (range, 36-51.9) and 49.8 (range, 19-86.4) months in patients with original and residual tumor resection respectively. Comparing patients with resection of residual tumor with various groups of patients who had undergone upfront surgery or mastectomy or resection of the original tumor bed, the studies did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in terms of margin status and oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Limited and heterogenous data exist on the extent of resection in BCS after NACT. No statistically significant difference was demonstrated by the studies in terms of re-excision rates and oncological outcomes between the two groups. These findings require validation in larger well-designed studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":101427,"journal":{"name":"Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer","volume":"7 ","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13187563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tbcr-25-40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) could cause tumor shrinkage and result in a higher rate of breast conservation. However, the extent of resection in breast conserving surgery (BCS) following NACT remained unclear. We conducted a literature review to determine the extent of resection in BCS after NACT.

Methods: A PubMed search was conducted for relevant articles from 1st January 2000 to 15th October 2024. Studies which included breast cancer patients who had undergone NACT and BCS were reviewed. We included studies which specifically specify the extent of resection and reported re-excision rates and/or oncological outcomes.

Key content and findings: Six studies (171 patients) and 11 studies (2,276 patients) with original and residual tumor resection respectively were reviewed. The average re-excision rates were 6.3% (range, 0-10.3%) and 9.6% (range, 0-19.2%) respectively. Average local recurrence rates were 10.9% (range, 7.7-14%) and 3.5% (range, 0.65-7.6%) after a follow-up of 44 (range, 36-51.9) and 49.8 (range, 19-86.4) months in patients with original and residual tumor resection respectively. Comparing patients with resection of residual tumor with various groups of patients who had undergone upfront surgery or mastectomy or resection of the original tumor bed, the studies did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in terms of margin status and oncological outcomes.

Conclusions: Limited and heterogenous data exist on the extent of resection in BCS after NACT. No statistically significant difference was demonstrated by the studies in terms of re-excision rates and oncological outcomes between the two groups. These findings require validation in larger well-designed studies.

新辅助化疗后保乳手术的切除程度:文献综述。
背景与目的:新辅助化疗(NACT)可使肿瘤缩小,提高乳房保存率。然而,NACT术后保乳手术(BCS)的切除范围尚不清楚。我们进行了文献回顾,以确定NACT术后BCS的切除程度。方法:检索2000年1月1日至2024年10月15日的相关文献。我们回顾了包括接受过NACT和BCS的乳腺癌患者的研究。我们纳入了明确规定切除范围和报告的再切除率和/或肿瘤结果的研究。主要内容和发现:回顾性分析了原发肿瘤切除6例(171例)和残留肿瘤切除11例(2276例)。平均再切除率分别为6.3%(范围0 ~ 10.3%)和9.6%(范围0 ~ 19.2%)。原发肿瘤切除患者随访44个月(36-51.9个月)、49.8个月(19-86.4个月),局部复发率分别为10.9%(范围7.7-14%)、3.5%(范围0.65-7.6%)。将切除残余肿瘤的患者与进行前期手术或乳房切除术或原发肿瘤床切除术的患者进行比较,研究未显示在切缘状态和肿瘤预后方面存在统计学差异。结论:关于NACT术后BCS切除程度的数据有限且不一致。两组在再切除率和肿瘤预后方面无统计学差异。这些发现需要在设计良好的大型研究中得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书