Rey Benjamin Ick Joson, Tessa Ying Zhen Tan, Geok Hoon Lim
{"title":"Extent of resection in breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a literature review.","authors":"Rey Benjamin Ick Joson, Tessa Ying Zhen Tan, Geok Hoon Lim","doi":"10.21037/tbcr-25-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) could cause tumor shrinkage and result in a higher rate of breast conservation. However, the extent of resection in breast conserving surgery (BCS) following NACT remained unclear. We conducted a literature review to determine the extent of resection in BCS after NACT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PubMed search was conducted for relevant articles from 1<sup>st</sup> January 2000 to 15<sup>th</sup> October 2024. Studies which included breast cancer patients who had undergone NACT and BCS were reviewed. We included studies which specifically specify the extent of resection and reported re-excision rates and/or oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>Six studies (171 patients) and 11 studies (2,276 patients) with original and residual tumor resection respectively were reviewed. The average re-excision rates were 6.3% (range, 0-10.3%) and 9.6% (range, 0-19.2%) respectively. Average local recurrence rates were 10.9% (range, 7.7-14%) and 3.5% (range, 0.65-7.6%) after a follow-up of 44 (range, 36-51.9) and 49.8 (range, 19-86.4) months in patients with original and residual tumor resection respectively. Comparing patients with resection of residual tumor with various groups of patients who had undergone upfront surgery or mastectomy or resection of the original tumor bed, the studies did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in terms of margin status and oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Limited and heterogenous data exist on the extent of resection in BCS after NACT. No statistically significant difference was demonstrated by the studies in terms of re-excision rates and oncological outcomes between the two groups. These findings require validation in larger well-designed studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":101427,"journal":{"name":"Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer","volume":"7 ","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13187563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tbcr-25-40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) could cause tumor shrinkage and result in a higher rate of breast conservation. However, the extent of resection in breast conserving surgery (BCS) following NACT remained unclear. We conducted a literature review to determine the extent of resection in BCS after NACT.
Methods: A PubMed search was conducted for relevant articles from 1st January 2000 to 15th October 2024. Studies which included breast cancer patients who had undergone NACT and BCS were reviewed. We included studies which specifically specify the extent of resection and reported re-excision rates and/or oncological outcomes.
Key content and findings: Six studies (171 patients) and 11 studies (2,276 patients) with original and residual tumor resection respectively were reviewed. The average re-excision rates were 6.3% (range, 0-10.3%) and 9.6% (range, 0-19.2%) respectively. Average local recurrence rates were 10.9% (range, 7.7-14%) and 3.5% (range, 0.65-7.6%) after a follow-up of 44 (range, 36-51.9) and 49.8 (range, 19-86.4) months in patients with original and residual tumor resection respectively. Comparing patients with resection of residual tumor with various groups of patients who had undergone upfront surgery or mastectomy or resection of the original tumor bed, the studies did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in terms of margin status and oncological outcomes.
Conclusions: Limited and heterogenous data exist on the extent of resection in BCS after NACT. No statistically significant difference was demonstrated by the studies in terms of re-excision rates and oncological outcomes between the two groups. These findings require validation in larger well-designed studies.