Systematic Review of Large Language Models and Natural Language Processing in Stroke Care: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.

IF 3.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) Pub Date : 2026-05-05 eCollection Date: 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1161/SVIN.125.002261
Kaue Tartarotti Nepomuceno Duarte, Abhijot Singh Sidhu, Maya Bakshi, Murilo Costa de Barros, Brij Karmur, Taha Aslan, Donghao Zhang, Mohamed AlShamrani, Wu Qiu, Bijoy K Menon
{"title":"Systematic Review of Large Language Models and Natural Language Processing in Stroke Care: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.","authors":"Kaue Tartarotti Nepomuceno Duarte, Abhijot Singh Sidhu, Maya Bakshi, Murilo Costa de Barros, Brij Karmur, Taha Aslan, Donghao Zhang, Mohamed AlShamrani, Wu Qiu, Bijoy K Menon","doi":"10.1161/SVIN.125.002261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stroke, a leading cause of mortality, manifests as ischemic (87%) or hemorrhagic (13%), demanding rapid intervention to mitigate irreversible damage. Despite advances in artificial intelligence, systematic reviews addressing the integration of large language models and natural language processing into clinical stroke care remain limited. Such a review is critical given large language models' potential to overcome traditional natural language processing limitations, thereby enhancing risk prediction and decision support. We proposed a systematic review aimed to comprehensively analyze applications in stroke care. After searching 6 databases, 2991 records were screened, yielding 65 eligible studies. Results were structured quantitatively (impact factor trends, publication distribution) and qualitatively across 4 dimensions: Study Purposes (eg, risk modeling, decision support), Data Sets/Key Findings, Limitations, and Future Directions. Large language models demonstrated strong capabilities in automated data extraction from clinical notes (accuracies of 93.5%-95.1%) and report summarization. However, majority of studies (94%) lacked external validation. Most were limited by single-center, retrospective designs (62%) and used private data sets (85%), raising concerns about generalizability. Common failure modes included model hallucinations, performance degradation on external data, and infrastructural barriers to clinical integration. Future efforts must prioritize multicenter, prospective validation (82% of studies) to ensure model robustness and generalizability across diverse populations. Pathways for clinical translation include developing interpretability techniques to build clinician trust. Technical refinements for hallucination mitigation (98% of studies) and real-time integration of multimodal data are necessary to enhance predictive power. Addressing data heterogeneity and ethical concerns remains as gaps. This review highlights the potential of large language models in stroke care, encompassing tasks from risk prediction to workflow automation. Realizing this potential requires a shift from proof-of-concept studies to rigorously validated, clinically integrated systems. The field demands scalable, equitable, and transparent artificial intelligence solutions that are codeveloped with clinicians. These are needed to overcome existing methodological and translational barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":74875,"journal":{"name":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":"6 3","pages":"e002261"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13189582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/SVIN.125.002261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stroke, a leading cause of mortality, manifests as ischemic (87%) or hemorrhagic (13%), demanding rapid intervention to mitigate irreversible damage. Despite advances in artificial intelligence, systematic reviews addressing the integration of large language models and natural language processing into clinical stroke care remain limited. Such a review is critical given large language models' potential to overcome traditional natural language processing limitations, thereby enhancing risk prediction and decision support. We proposed a systematic review aimed to comprehensively analyze applications in stroke care. After searching 6 databases, 2991 records were screened, yielding 65 eligible studies. Results were structured quantitatively (impact factor trends, publication distribution) and qualitatively across 4 dimensions: Study Purposes (eg, risk modeling, decision support), Data Sets/Key Findings, Limitations, and Future Directions. Large language models demonstrated strong capabilities in automated data extraction from clinical notes (accuracies of 93.5%-95.1%) and report summarization. However, majority of studies (94%) lacked external validation. Most were limited by single-center, retrospective designs (62%) and used private data sets (85%), raising concerns about generalizability. Common failure modes included model hallucinations, performance degradation on external data, and infrastructural barriers to clinical integration. Future efforts must prioritize multicenter, prospective validation (82% of studies) to ensure model robustness and generalizability across diverse populations. Pathways for clinical translation include developing interpretability techniques to build clinician trust. Technical refinements for hallucination mitigation (98% of studies) and real-time integration of multimodal data are necessary to enhance predictive power. Addressing data heterogeneity and ethical concerns remains as gaps. This review highlights the potential of large language models in stroke care, encompassing tasks from risk prediction to workflow automation. Realizing this potential requires a shift from proof-of-concept studies to rigorously validated, clinically integrated systems. The field demands scalable, equitable, and transparent artificial intelligence solutions that are codeveloped with clinicians. These are needed to overcome existing methodological and translational barriers.

大语言模型和自然语言处理在中风护理中的系统综述:应用、挑战和未来方向。
中风是死亡的主要原因,表现为缺血性(87%)或出血性(13%),需要快速干预以减轻不可逆转的损害。尽管人工智能取得了进步,但将大型语言模型和自然语言处理整合到临床中风治疗中的系统综述仍然有限。考虑到大型语言模型克服传统自然语言处理限制的潜力,从而增强风险预测和决策支持,这样的审查是至关重要的。我们提出了一项系统综述,旨在全面分析其在脑卒中护理中的应用。在检索6个数据库后,筛选2991条记录,获得65项符合条件的研究。结果分为四个维度:研究目的(如风险建模、决策支持)、数据集/关键发现、局限性和未来方向。大型语言模型在临床记录的自动数据提取(准确率为93.5%-95.1%)和报告总结方面表现出较强的能力。然而,大多数研究(94%)缺乏外部验证。大多数研究受限于单中心、回顾性设计(62%)和使用私人数据集(85%),这引起了人们对其普遍性的担忧。常见的失败模式包括模型幻觉、外部数据的性能下降以及临床集成的基础设施障碍。未来的工作必须优先考虑多中心、前瞻性验证(82%的研究),以确保模型在不同人群中的稳健性和泛化性。临床翻译的途径包括发展可解释性技术,以建立临床医生的信任。缓解幻觉的技术改进(98%的研究)和多模态数据的实时集成对于增强预测能力是必要的。解决数据异质性和伦理问题仍然是差距。这篇综述强调了大型语言模型在卒中护理中的潜力,包括从风险预测到工作流程自动化的任务。实现这一潜力需要从概念验证研究转向严格验证的临床集成系统。该领域需要与临床医生共同开发可扩展、公平和透明的人工智能解决方案。这些都需要克服现有的方法和翻译障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书