A systematic review assessing mobile health (mHealth) physical activity interventions in older adults with and without chronic health conditions.

IF 3.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
mHealth Pub Date : 2026-04-24 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.21037/mhealth-2025-67
Maria V Goodwin, Katelynn Slade, Emily Urry, David W Maidment
{"title":"A systematic review assessing mobile health (mHealth) physical activity interventions in older adults with and without chronic health conditions.","authors":"Maria V Goodwin, Katelynn Slade, Emily Urry, David W Maidment","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-2025-67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Engaging in regular physical activity is a key protective factor for reducing the risk of developing chronic health conditions associated with ageing. However, physical activity declines markedly with increasing age. The aim of this prospectively registered systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of mobile health (mHealth) physical activity interventions, and the behaviour change techniques (BCTs) they employ, in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), CRD42022342016. Eight databases (APA PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, Medline, PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science) were searched up to February 2025. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating mHealth interventions (e.g., smartphone apps, wearable devices) designed to increase physical activity in community-dwelling older adults (≥65 years) living with and without chronic health conditions. Primary outcomes included measures of physical activity (both objective and self-reported), functional fitness, and adverse effects. Secondary outcomes were physiological health, psychosocial wellbeing, and cognition. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2, and certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine RCTs were included, assessing mHealth interventions such as wearable devices, smartphone apps, or virtual coaching. Due to methodological heterogeneity across studies, meta-analyses were not possible. A narrative synthesis revealed limited or inconsistent findings for all primary and secondary outcomes. Interventions incorporated a limited number of the 93 available BCTs, with the most frequently used being self-monitoring of behaviour, information about antecedents, and feedback on behaviour. There was substantial variation in the number and combination of BCTs employed across studies, limiting the ability to evaluate their individual or combined effectiveness. Due to insufficient data, it was not possible to compare the effectiveness of mHealth interventions between healthy older adults and those living with chronic ill-health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current review highlights that further research in this area is needed, as well as a requirement to optimise the design of mHealth physical activity interventions that incorporate suitable BCTs so that they can adequately address the complex needs of those living with and without chronic health conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"12 ","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13187567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-2025-67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Engaging in regular physical activity is a key protective factor for reducing the risk of developing chronic health conditions associated with ageing. However, physical activity declines markedly with increasing age. The aim of this prospectively registered systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of mobile health (mHealth) physical activity interventions, and the behaviour change techniques (BCTs) they employ, in older adults.

Methods: This review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), CRD42022342016. Eight databases (APA PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, Medline, PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science) were searched up to February 2025. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating mHealth interventions (e.g., smartphone apps, wearable devices) designed to increase physical activity in community-dwelling older adults (≥65 years) living with and without chronic health conditions. Primary outcomes included measures of physical activity (both objective and self-reported), functional fitness, and adverse effects. Secondary outcomes were physiological health, psychosocial wellbeing, and cognition. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2, and certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Results: Nine RCTs were included, assessing mHealth interventions such as wearable devices, smartphone apps, or virtual coaching. Due to methodological heterogeneity across studies, meta-analyses were not possible. A narrative synthesis revealed limited or inconsistent findings for all primary and secondary outcomes. Interventions incorporated a limited number of the 93 available BCTs, with the most frequently used being self-monitoring of behaviour, information about antecedents, and feedback on behaviour. There was substantial variation in the number and combination of BCTs employed across studies, limiting the ability to evaluate their individual or combined effectiveness. Due to insufficient data, it was not possible to compare the effectiveness of mHealth interventions between healthy older adults and those living with chronic ill-health.

Conclusions: The current review highlights that further research in this area is needed, as well as a requirement to optimise the design of mHealth physical activity interventions that incorporate suitable BCTs so that they can adequately address the complex needs of those living with and without chronic health conditions.

一项评估有或无慢性疾病的老年人移动健康(mHealth)身体活动干预措施的系统综述。
背景:参加有规律的身体活动是降低患与衰老相关的慢性疾病风险的关键保护因素。然而,随着年龄的增长,身体活动明显减少。这项前瞻性系统评价的目的是评估移动健康(mHealth)身体活动干预措施及其在老年人中使用的行为改变技术(bct)的有效性。方法:本综述已在国际前瞻性系统评价登记册(PROSPERO)注册,编号为CRD42022342016。8个数据库(APA PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, Medline, PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science)被检索到2025年2月。符合条件的研究是随机对照试验(RCTs),评估移动健康干预措施(例如,智能手机应用程序、可穿戴设备),旨在增加社区居住的老年人(≥65岁)的身体活动,这些老年人有或没有慢性健康状况。主要结果包括身体活动(客观和自我报告)、功能健康和不良反应的测量。次要结局是生理健康、社会心理健康和认知。使用Cochrane风险偏倚工具第2版评估偏倚风险,使用分级推荐评估、发展和评价(GRADE)方法评估证据的确定性。结果:纳入了9项随机对照试验,评估了移动健康干预措施,如可穿戴设备、智能手机应用程序或虚拟教练。由于研究方法的异质性,不可能进行荟萃分析。一项叙述性综合研究显示,所有主要和次要结果的研究结果有限或不一致。干预措施纳入了有限数量的93个可用的btc,最常用的是行为的自我监控、有关前事的信息和对行为的反馈。不同研究中使用的bct的数量和组合存在很大差异,限制了评估其单独或联合有效性的能力。由于数据不足,无法比较健康老年人和慢性病患者之间移动健康干预措施的有效性。结论:目前的综述强调,需要在这一领域进行进一步的研究,并需要优化移动健康体育活动干预的设计,包括合适的bct,以便它们能够充分满足那些患有和没有慢性健康状况的人的复杂需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书