Littératie en santé et approche One Health : l’exemple des zoonoses chez les étudiants français en santé.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Fleur Delebarre, Julien Masson
{"title":"Littératie en santé et approche One Health : l’exemple des zoonoses chez les étudiants français en santé.","authors":"Fleur Delebarre, Julien Masson","doi":"10.3917/spub.262.0077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Zoonoses are a public health issue and highlight the importance of the One Health approach. Their prevention relies on health literacy, particularly among future health professionals, who will play a key role in health prevention. The aim of this study is to assess and compare the perceived knowledge of French health students regarding the One Health approach and zoonoses with that of students in other fields of study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among higher education students in France (n=960). Using a self-administered questionnaire based on the CCiC scale, the study explores three dimensions: anthropocentric knowledge, responsible environmental knowledge, and responsible environmental health knowledge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Non-parametric statistical tests show that health students report a better understanding of the health issues related to zoonoses than other students. However, no significant differences were observed in the environmental and environmental health dimensions. Across all students, environmental health knowledge was the highest, followed by environmental knowledge and then anthropocentric knowledge.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These results suggest that training in the health professions primarily promotes an approach focused on the health risks of zoonoses, without necessarily reinforcing an integrated vision of the One Health approach with regard to the risk they pose to human health. This highlights the importance of strengthening the integration of the One Health approach in the training of future health professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":"38 2","pages":"77-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.262.0077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Zoonoses are a public health issue and highlight the importance of the One Health approach. Their prevention relies on health literacy, particularly among future health professionals, who will play a key role in health prevention. The aim of this study is to assess and compare the perceived knowledge of French health students regarding the One Health approach and zoonoses with that of students in other fields of study.

Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among higher education students in France (n=960). Using a self-administered questionnaire based on the CCiC scale, the study explores three dimensions: anthropocentric knowledge, responsible environmental knowledge, and responsible environmental health knowledge.

Results: Non-parametric statistical tests show that health students report a better understanding of the health issues related to zoonoses than other students. However, no significant differences were observed in the environmental and environmental health dimensions. Across all students, environmental health knowledge was the highest, followed by environmental knowledge and then anthropocentric knowledge.

Discussion: These results suggest that training in the health professions primarily promotes an approach focused on the health risks of zoonoses, without necessarily reinforcing an integrated vision of the One Health approach with regard to the risk they pose to human health. This highlights the importance of strengthening the integration of the One Health approach in the training of future health professionals.

健康素养和一种健康方法:法国健康学生人畜共患病的例子。
人畜共患病是一个公共卫生问题,强调了“同一个健康”方法的重要性。预防这些疾病依赖于卫生知识普及,特别是未来的卫生专业人员,他们将在卫生预防方面发挥关键作用。本研究的目的是评估和比较法国卫生专业学生与其他专业学生对“同一个健康”方法和人畜共患病的认知知识。方法:对960名法国高等教育学生进行横断面分析研究。本研究采用基于CCiC量表的自填问卷,探讨了人类中心主义知识、负责任的环境知识和负责任的环境健康知识三个维度。结果:非参数统计检验表明,卫生专业学生比其他学生更了解与人畜共患病有关的健康问题。然而,在环境和环境健康方面没有观察到显著差异。在所有学生中,环境健康知识是最高的,其次是环境知识,然后是人类中心知识。讨论:这些结果表明,卫生专业人员的培训主要是促进一种侧重于人畜共患疾病健康风险的方法,而不一定加强关于它们对人类健康构成风险的“同一个健康”方法的综合愿景。这突出了在培训未来保健专业人员方面加强统一保健办法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sante Publique
Sante Publique PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
252
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs, professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale. Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé, organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources, politiques de régulation et de financement, etc
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书