Predicting pharmacy choice for managed care network design.

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Michael Irungu, Suhila Sawesi, Mohamed Rashrash, Pranitha Presingu, Kyle Kane, Jon Schommer, Lawrence Brown
{"title":"Predicting pharmacy choice for managed care network design.","authors":"Michael Irungu, Suhila Sawesi, Mohamed Rashrash, Pranitha Presingu, Kyle Kane, Jon Schommer, Lawrence Brown","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2026.32.6.679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacy type selection is a key component of medication access and use. Prior studies have commonly used logistic regression to examine pharmacy type choice, but this approach may not fully capture complex relationships among patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine patient characteristics associated with pharmacy type selection and to compare the performance of traditional logistic regression with ensemble machine learning models for predicting pharmacy type selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of adults participating in the 2021 National Consumer Survey on Medication Experience (NCSME-PR; n = 1,502). The outcome was the pharmacy type selected when a prescription medication was needed, categorized as chain, independent, supermarket, mass merchandise, mail-order, or clinic-based pharmacy. Predictors included patient characteristics defined by the Andersen Behavioral Model of Health Services Use, encompassing predisposing, enabling, and need factors. We compared logistic regression with random forest and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models using 5-fold cross-validation and held-out test data. Model discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across pharmacy types, ensemble models demonstrated higher discrimination than logistic regression, with XGBoost achieving the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values. Prior mail-order pharmacy use, number of chronic conditions, income, and US region were consistently associated with the selection of pharmacy type. Ensemble models captured nonlinear patterns in these associations that were not fully reflected in logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pharmacy type selection varies by patient characteristics and pharmacy type, and predictive performance differs by analytic approach. Comparative modeling indicates that conclusions about pharmacy choice may depend on the modeling framework used. These findings contribute to pharmacy choice research and highlight considerations for future studies using managed care administrative data.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"32 6","pages":"679-690"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13193322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2026.32.6.679","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pharmacy type selection is a key component of medication access and use. Prior studies have commonly used logistic regression to examine pharmacy type choice, but this approach may not fully capture complex relationships among patient characteristics.

Objective: To examine patient characteristics associated with pharmacy type selection and to compare the performance of traditional logistic regression with ensemble machine learning models for predicting pharmacy type selection.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of adults participating in the 2021 National Consumer Survey on Medication Experience (NCSME-PR; n = 1,502). The outcome was the pharmacy type selected when a prescription medication was needed, categorized as chain, independent, supermarket, mass merchandise, mail-order, or clinic-based pharmacy. Predictors included patient characteristics defined by the Andersen Behavioral Model of Health Services Use, encompassing predisposing, enabling, and need factors. We compared logistic regression with random forest and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models using 5-fold cross-validation and held-out test data. Model discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results: Across pharmacy types, ensemble models demonstrated higher discrimination than logistic regression, with XGBoost achieving the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values. Prior mail-order pharmacy use, number of chronic conditions, income, and US region were consistently associated with the selection of pharmacy type. Ensemble models captured nonlinear patterns in these associations that were not fully reflected in logistic regression models.

Conclusions: Pharmacy type selection varies by patient characteristics and pharmacy type, and predictive performance differs by analytic approach. Comparative modeling indicates that conclusions about pharmacy choice may depend on the modeling framework used. These findings contribute to pharmacy choice research and highlight considerations for future studies using managed care administrative data.

管理医疗网络设计预测药房选择。
背景:药店类型选择是药品可及性和使用的关键组成部分。先前的研究通常使用逻辑回归来检查药房类型选择,但这种方法可能无法完全捕获患者特征之间的复杂关系。目的:研究与药物类型选择相关的患者特征,并比较传统逻辑回归与集成机器学习模型在预测药物类型选择方面的性能。方法:我们对参加2021年全国消费者用药经历调查(ncme - pr; n = 1,502)的成年人进行了横断面分析。结果是当需要处方药时选择的药房类型,分类为连锁、独立、超市、大宗商品、邮购或诊所药房。预测因子包括由Andersen卫生服务使用行为模型定义的患者特征,包括易感因素、使能因素和需求因素。我们使用5倍交叉验证和hold out测试数据将逻辑回归与随机森林和极端梯度增强(XGBoost)模型进行比较。模型判别用受试者工作特征曲线下的面积来评估。结果:在不同的药房类型中,集成模型比逻辑回归具有更高的判别性,其中XGBoost在受试者工作特征曲线值下的面积最大。以前邮购药房的使用,慢性病的数量,收入和美国地区一致与药房类型的选择相关。集成模型捕获了这些关联中的非线性模式,这些模式在逻辑回归模型中没有完全反映出来。结论:药物类型的选择因患者特征和药物类型而异,分析方法的预测效果不同。比较模型表明,关于药物选择的结论可能取决于所使用的建模框架。这些发现有助于药房选择研究,并强调了未来使用管理医疗管理数据研究的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书