Comparative effectiveness of sulfonylureas on kidney outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes and moderate cardiovascular risk: a target trial emulation.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Stacey Sklepinski, Alexandria A Ratzki-Leewing, Jeph Herrin, Kavya Sindhu Swarna, Yihong Deng, Eric C Polley, Joshua J Neumiller, Rodolfo J Galindo, Guillermo E Umpierrez, Joseph S Ross, Juan P Brito, Victor M Montori, Mindy M Mickelson, Rozalina Grubina McCoy
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of sulfonylureas on kidney outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes and moderate cardiovascular risk: a target trial emulation.","authors":"Stacey Sklepinski, Alexandria A Ratzki-Leewing, Jeph Herrin, Kavya Sindhu Swarna, Yihong Deng, Eric C Polley, Joshua J Neumiller, Rodolfo J Galindo, Guillermo E Umpierrez, Joseph S Ross, Juan P Brito, Victor M Montori, Mindy M Mickelson, Rozalina Grubina McCoy","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2025-005775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To assess the within-class variation in kidney outcomes following initiation of sulfonylurea therapy.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We used claims data of enrollees in commercial, Medicare Advantage, and traditional Medicare health plans between 2014 and 2021 to emulate a target trial including adults ≥21 years with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk to compare initiation of glimepiride, glipizide, or glyburide on the incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3 or worse, including initiation of kidney replacement therapy (primary outcome); secondary outcomes examined incident CKD stages 3-4, kidney failure (including kidney replacement therapy), all-cause mortality, and hypoglycemia requiring emergency department or hospital care. Random treatment assignment was emulated using propensity scores, estimated using the super learner ensemble method, and incorporated as inverse probability of treatment weights into proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The weighted study cohort included 295 092 individuals starting glimepiride (n=134 926), glipizide (n=145 984), and glyburide (n=14 182). One year after treatment initiation, stage 3 or worse CKD developed in 2.1% of patients in the glimepiride group, 2.2% in the glipizide group, and 1.8% in the glyburide group. Glyburide was associated with a lower risk of kidney complications compared with both glimepiride (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.92) and glipizide (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.89), despite a higher risk of severe hypoglycemia (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.71 vs glipizide and HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.42 vs glimepiride). In contrast, the risk of kidney complications was modestly increased with glipizide compared with glimepiride use (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Glyburide was associated with a modestly lower risk of kidney complications, despite a higher risk of hypoglycemia, while glipizide was associated with a higher risk of kidney complications. These hypothesis-generating findings suggest important within-class differences that warrant consideration in clinical decision-making and future research. Despite rigorous prespecified causal inference analytic methods, the risk of unmeasured confounding and bias by indication with the use of observational data remains.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05214573.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13202062/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2025-005775","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To assess the within-class variation in kidney outcomes following initiation of sulfonylurea therapy.

Research design and methods: We used claims data of enrollees in commercial, Medicare Advantage, and traditional Medicare health plans between 2014 and 2021 to emulate a target trial including adults ≥21 years with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk to compare initiation of glimepiride, glipizide, or glyburide on the incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3 or worse, including initiation of kidney replacement therapy (primary outcome); secondary outcomes examined incident CKD stages 3-4, kidney failure (including kidney replacement therapy), all-cause mortality, and hypoglycemia requiring emergency department or hospital care. Random treatment assignment was emulated using propensity scores, estimated using the super learner ensemble method, and incorporated as inverse probability of treatment weights into proportional hazards models.

Results: The weighted study cohort included 295 092 individuals starting glimepiride (n=134 926), glipizide (n=145 984), and glyburide (n=14 182). One year after treatment initiation, stage 3 or worse CKD developed in 2.1% of patients in the glimepiride group, 2.2% in the glipizide group, and 1.8% in the glyburide group. Glyburide was associated with a lower risk of kidney complications compared with both glimepiride (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.92) and glipizide (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.89), despite a higher risk of severe hypoglycemia (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.71 vs glipizide and HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.42 vs glimepiride). In contrast, the risk of kidney complications was modestly increased with glipizide compared with glimepiride use (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.07).

Conclusions: Glyburide was associated with a modestly lower risk of kidney complications, despite a higher risk of hypoglycemia, while glipizide was associated with a higher risk of kidney complications. These hypothesis-generating findings suggest important within-class differences that warrant consideration in clinical decision-making and future research. Despite rigorous prespecified causal inference analytic methods, the risk of unmeasured confounding and bias by indication with the use of observational data remains.

Trial registration number: NCT05214573.

磺脲类药物对成人2型糖尿病和中度心血管风险患者肾脏预后的比较疗效:一项目标试验模拟
简介:评估开始磺脲类药物治疗后肾脏预后的分级内变化。研究设计和方法:我们使用2014年至2021年间商业、医疗保险优势和传统医疗保险健康计划入组者的索赔数据来模拟一项目标试验,该试验包括中度心血管风险的成人≥21岁2型糖尿病患者,比较格列美脲、格列吡嗪或格列本脲对慢性肾脏疾病(CKD) 3期或更严重发生率的影响,包括开始肾脏替代治疗(主要结局);次要结局检查了CKD 3-4期事件、肾衰竭(包括肾脏替代治疗)、全因死亡率和需要急诊或医院护理的低血糖。随机处理分配使用倾向得分模拟,使用超级学习者集成方法估计,并将处理权重的逆概率纳入比例风险模型。结果:加权研究队列包括295 092名开始使用格列美脲(n=134 926)、格列吡嗪(n=145 984)和格列本脲(n=14 182)的患者。治疗开始一年后,格列美脲组中有2.1%的患者出现3期或更严重的CKD,格列吡嗪组为2.2%,格列本脲组为1.8%。与格列美脲(HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76 ~ 0.92)和格列吡嗪(HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.73 ~ 0.89)相比,格列本脲发生肾脏并发症的风险较低,但发生严重低血糖的风险较高(HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.27 ~ 1.71, HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05 ~ 1.42)。相比之下,格列吡嗪与格列美脲相比,肾脏并发症的风险略有增加(HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00 - 1.07)。结论:格列本脲与肾脏并发症的风险较低相关,尽管低血糖风险较高,而格列吡嗪与肾脏并发症的风险较高相关。这些产生假设的发现提示了重要的类内差异,值得临床决策和未来研究的考虑。尽管有严格的预先指定的因果推理分析方法,但使用观测数据的指示仍然存在不可测量的混淆和偏倚的风险。试验注册号:NCT05214573。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
123
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care is an open access journal committed to publishing high-quality, basic and clinical research articles regarding type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and associated complications. Only original content will be accepted, and submissions are subject to rigorous peer review to ensure the publication of high-quality — and evidence-based — original research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书