Elizaveta Ershova-Menze, Jon-Ivar Westgaard, Helene Hjellnes, Tone Falkenhaug
{"title":"Optimising Zooplankton DNA Metabarcoding: Methodological Considerations for Large-Scale Monitoring.","authors":"Elizaveta Ershova-Menze, Jon-Ivar Westgaard, Helene Hjellnes, Tone Falkenhaug","doi":"10.1111/1755-0998.70149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>DNA metabarcoding is becoming an increasingly common approach in ecological monitoring of marine and freshwater planktonic communities, yet methodological choices along the metabarcoding workflow and data post-processing approaches remain highly inconsistent across studies, limiting the ability to track biodiversity trends, detect range shifts, or integrate datasets across monitoring programs. This study addresses this methodological bottleneck by combining controlled experimental comparisons with a comprehensive literature synthesis to identify how protocol decisions-from sample preservation and DNA extraction to sequencing platforms and taxonomic assignments-affect the results of COI metabarcoding and its interpretation. Overall biodiversity and community patterns were recovered by all combinations of tested methods, supporting the notion that patterns identified through DNA metabarcoding are robust and comparable across studies. We identify TES (Tris-EDTA-SDS) buffer, optionally paired with at-sea homogenisation, as a practical alternative to ethanol preservation for large-scale monitoring surveys. We show that integrating several classification methods and reference databases for taxonomic assignment improves diversity estimates and confidence in the assignments, and advocate for increased use of tools like BOLDigger that facilitate manual curation of ambiguous/erroneous references. Finally, we demonstrate that introducing stricter filtering thresholds reduces the effect of false positives, pseudogenes and lab-specific contamination, and make comparisons of data generated by different laboratories and methodological configurations more robust, although potentially at the expense of excluding rare taxa. While we intentionally refrain from recommending a universal best practices protocol, this study aims to provide a practical roadmap to help enhance the reliability and reproducibility of marine zooplankton monitoring via DNA metabarcoding.</p>","PeriodicalId":211,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology Resources","volume":"26 4","pages":"e70149"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Ecology Resources","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.70149","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
DNA metabarcoding is becoming an increasingly common approach in ecological monitoring of marine and freshwater planktonic communities, yet methodological choices along the metabarcoding workflow and data post-processing approaches remain highly inconsistent across studies, limiting the ability to track biodiversity trends, detect range shifts, or integrate datasets across monitoring programs. This study addresses this methodological bottleneck by combining controlled experimental comparisons with a comprehensive literature synthesis to identify how protocol decisions-from sample preservation and DNA extraction to sequencing platforms and taxonomic assignments-affect the results of COI metabarcoding and its interpretation. Overall biodiversity and community patterns were recovered by all combinations of tested methods, supporting the notion that patterns identified through DNA metabarcoding are robust and comparable across studies. We identify TES (Tris-EDTA-SDS) buffer, optionally paired with at-sea homogenisation, as a practical alternative to ethanol preservation for large-scale monitoring surveys. We show that integrating several classification methods and reference databases for taxonomic assignment improves diversity estimates and confidence in the assignments, and advocate for increased use of tools like BOLDigger that facilitate manual curation of ambiguous/erroneous references. Finally, we demonstrate that introducing stricter filtering thresholds reduces the effect of false positives, pseudogenes and lab-specific contamination, and make comparisons of data generated by different laboratories and methodological configurations more robust, although potentially at the expense of excluding rare taxa. While we intentionally refrain from recommending a universal best practices protocol, this study aims to provide a practical roadmap to help enhance the reliability and reproducibility of marine zooplankton monitoring via DNA metabarcoding.
期刊介绍:
Molecular Ecology Resources promotes the creation of comprehensive resources for the scientific community, encompassing computer programs, statistical and molecular advancements, and a diverse array of molecular tools. Serving as a conduit for disseminating these resources, the journal targets a broad audience of researchers in the fields of evolution, ecology, and conservation. Articles in Molecular Ecology Resources are crafted to support investigations tackling significant questions within these disciplines.
In addition to original resource articles, Molecular Ecology Resources features Reviews, Opinions, and Comments relevant to the field. The journal also periodically releases Special Issues focusing on resource development within specific areas.