A Systematic Review of Psychometric Instruments Used to Measure Stroke Family Caregiver Health.

IF 2
Cleopatra Kum, Natalie Kreitzer, Holly J Jones, Elaine L Miller, Atiphat Promsombut, Islam Banisalman, Tamilyn Bakas
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Psychometric Instruments Used to Measure Stroke Family Caregiver Health.","authors":"Cleopatra Kum, Natalie Kreitzer, Holly J Jones, Elaine L Miller, Atiphat Promsombut, Islam Banisalman, Tamilyn Bakas","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke family caregivers have been found to neglect their own health as they provide much-needed care to their loved ones. They have been shown to experience significantly poorer health than non-caregiving populations. Studies addressing stroke family caregiver health tend to use a wide variety of instruments to measure this concept. The purpose of this review is to examine the psychometric instruments currently used in the stroke family caregiving literature to measure stroke caregivers' health. During this process, relevance will be assessed, key measurement gaps will be identified, and recommendations will be provided for future research and clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Guided by PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases and included peer-reviewed studies published between January 2000 and October 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 39 studies met the inclusion criteria. The most frequently used were the Medical Outcomes Short Form (SF-36), followed by the European Quality of Life Instrument (EuroQol), the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS), the Abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life Measure (WHOQoL-Bref), the Unhealthy Days Measure, and the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). All were global measures, except for the BCOS, which was caregiver-specific. The BCOS did not measure healthy behaviors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Currently available instruments remain useful, but their selection and interpretation in stroke family caregiver populations require awareness of their strengths and limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94240,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","volume":" ","pages":"149-154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke family caregivers have been found to neglect their own health as they provide much-needed care to their loved ones. They have been shown to experience significantly poorer health than non-caregiving populations. Studies addressing stroke family caregiver health tend to use a wide variety of instruments to measure this concept. The purpose of this review is to examine the psychometric instruments currently used in the stroke family caregiving literature to measure stroke caregivers' health. During this process, relevance will be assessed, key measurement gaps will be identified, and recommendations will be provided for future research and clinical practice.

Methods: Guided by PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases and included peer-reviewed studies published between January 2000 and October 2025.

Results: A total of 39 studies met the inclusion criteria. The most frequently used were the Medical Outcomes Short Form (SF-36), followed by the European Quality of Life Instrument (EuroQol), the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS), the Abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life Measure (WHOQoL-Bref), the Unhealthy Days Measure, and the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). All were global measures, except for the BCOS, which was caregiver-specific. The BCOS did not measure healthy behaviors.

Conclusions: Currently available instruments remain useful, but their selection and interpretation in stroke family caregiver populations require awareness of their strengths and limitations.

用于测量中风家属照护者健康的心理测量仪器的系统综述。
背景:中风家庭照顾者在为他们所爱的人提供急需的照顾时,被发现忽视了自己的健康。事实证明,他们的健康状况明显比不照顾他人的人差。针对中风家庭照顾者健康的研究倾向于使用各种各样的工具来衡量这一概念。本综述的目的是检查目前在中风家庭照护文献中使用的心理测量工具,以测量中风照护者的健康。在此过程中,将评估相关性,确定关键测量差距,并为未来的研究和临床实践提供建议。方法:在PRISMA指南的指导下,对多个数据库进行全面检索,包括2000年1月至2025年10月期间发表的同行评审研究。结果:39项研究符合纳入标准。最常用的是医疗结果简短表(SF-36),其次是欧洲生活质量量表(EuroQol)、巴卡斯护理结果量表(BCOS)、简略的世界卫生组织生活质量量表(WHOQoL-Bref)、不健康天数量表和疾病影响概况(SIP)。除了BCOS是针对护理人员的,其他都是全球测量。BCOS没有测量健康行为。结论:目前可用的仪器仍然有用,但在卒中家庭护理人群中,它们的选择和解释需要了解它们的优势和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书