{"title":"Assessment of different direct printed aligner resins for leaching of urethane dimethacrylate: an in vivo study.","authors":"Aswathi Selvaraj, Deepak Prabhu, Balaji Krishnan, Parameswaran Tm, Mahalakshmi Krishnakumaran, Mohan Kumar","doi":"10.2319/092225-788.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the release of urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) from the direct printed aligners using Tera Harz TC-85 resin (Graphy, Seoul, Korea) and Clear A resin (Senertek, Türkiye) in saliva samples at different time intervals.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective quasiexperimental study included 2 groups: Group A Tera Harz TC-85 (Graphy, Seoul, Korea) and Group B Clear A resin (Senertek, Izmir, Türkiye), each with 13 participants. Patients wore aligners for more than 20 hours a day for 14 days. Whole saliva samples were obtained at several time intervals: T0 before aligners were inserted and T1, T2, and T3 after 24 hours, 7 days, and 14 days of usage, respectively. High-performance liquid chromatography was used to analyze the samples, and the average results were computed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed significant variations in UDMA leaching between groups A and B at all postintervention periods. Group B had a significantly greater mean UDMA release than Group A at T1, T2, and T3. Intragroup analysis revealed time-dependent increases in UDMA release in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings revealed significant differences in UDMA release rates between the two materials, with Tera Harz TC-85 consistently showing lower levels of leaching than Clear A resin over the 14-day study period. Tera Harz TC-85 has superior performance in minimizing UDMA leaching, while both materials maintained acceptable profiles under the study conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13692982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/092225-788.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the release of urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) from the direct printed aligners using Tera Harz TC-85 resin (Graphy, Seoul, Korea) and Clear A resin (Senertek, Türkiye) in saliva samples at different time intervals.
Materials and methods: This prospective quasiexperimental study included 2 groups: Group A Tera Harz TC-85 (Graphy, Seoul, Korea) and Group B Clear A resin (Senertek, Izmir, Türkiye), each with 13 participants. Patients wore aligners for more than 20 hours a day for 14 days. Whole saliva samples were obtained at several time intervals: T0 before aligners were inserted and T1, T2, and T3 after 24 hours, 7 days, and 14 days of usage, respectively. High-performance liquid chromatography was used to analyze the samples, and the average results were computed.
Results: Results showed significant variations in UDMA leaching between groups A and B at all postintervention periods. Group B had a significantly greater mean UDMA release than Group A at T1, T2, and T3. Intragroup analysis revealed time-dependent increases in UDMA release in both groups.
Conclusions: The findings revealed significant differences in UDMA release rates between the two materials, with Tera Harz TC-85 consistently showing lower levels of leaching than Clear A resin over the 14-day study period. Tera Harz TC-85 has superior performance in minimizing UDMA leaching, while both materials maintained acceptable profiles under the study conditions.