Deep Learning Enhances Failure Mode Analysis in Dental Adhesion Studies.

IF 5.9
B Cournault, L Vedrenne, T Roman, V Moyaux, H Jmal, O Etienne
{"title":"Deep Learning Enhances Failure Mode Analysis in Dental Adhesion Studies.","authors":"B Cournault, L Vedrenne, T Roman, V Moyaux, H Jmal, O Etienne","doi":"10.1177/00220345261437724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Failure mode analysis after shear bond strength testing is essential for evaluating adhesive performance yet remains highly subjective when relying solely on optical microscopy. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a convolutional neural network (CNN) for automated failure mode classification after shear bond strength using optical microscopy images, trained on ground truth derived from focus variation profilometry supported by scanning electron microscopy. A dataset of 434 fractured interfaces from shear bond strength tests on human teeth was labeled with optical profilometry validated by scanning electron microscopy. Optical microscopy images were acquired at 100× magnification. A CNN was trained exclusively on optical images to classify failure modes and compared with expert human observers. Classification performance was assessed per the weighted F1 score. The CNN achieved a mean ± SD of 0.893 ± 0.032 across 20 folds. Individual expert observers obtained F1 scores of 0.895, 0.911, and 0.824. When aggregated into a consensus reference, expert agreement reached an F1 score of 0.914. Misclassifications predominantly involved specimens with failure mode proportions close to the predefined threshold separating mixed from predominantly adhesive failures. A CNN trained on profilometry-based ground truth achieved expert-level performance in classifying failure modes from optical microscopy images. This automated approach reduces operator-dependent variability and offers a scalable objective alternative to visual classification, representing a significant advance toward standardizing failure mode analysis in dental adhesion research.</p>","PeriodicalId":94075,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental research","volume":" ","pages":"220345261437724"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345261437724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Failure mode analysis after shear bond strength testing is essential for evaluating adhesive performance yet remains highly subjective when relying solely on optical microscopy. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a convolutional neural network (CNN) for automated failure mode classification after shear bond strength using optical microscopy images, trained on ground truth derived from focus variation profilometry supported by scanning electron microscopy. A dataset of 434 fractured interfaces from shear bond strength tests on human teeth was labeled with optical profilometry validated by scanning electron microscopy. Optical microscopy images were acquired at 100× magnification. A CNN was trained exclusively on optical images to classify failure modes and compared with expert human observers. Classification performance was assessed per the weighted F1 score. The CNN achieved a mean ± SD of 0.893 ± 0.032 across 20 folds. Individual expert observers obtained F1 scores of 0.895, 0.911, and 0.824. When aggregated into a consensus reference, expert agreement reached an F1 score of 0.914. Misclassifications predominantly involved specimens with failure mode proportions close to the predefined threshold separating mixed from predominantly adhesive failures. A CNN trained on profilometry-based ground truth achieved expert-level performance in classifying failure modes from optical microscopy images. This automated approach reduces operator-dependent variability and offers a scalable objective alternative to visual classification, representing a significant advance toward standardizing failure mode analysis in dental adhesion research.

深度学习增强牙粘连研究中的失效模式分析。
剪切粘接强度测试后的破坏模式分析对于评估粘接性能至关重要,但仅依靠光学显微镜时仍然非常主观。本研究旨在开发和评估一种卷积神经网络(CNN),用于使用光学显微镜图像对剪切键合强度进行自动失效模式分类,该图像是在扫描电子显微镜支持的焦点变化轮廓术的基础上训练的。利用扫描电镜验证的光学轮廓术对人类牙齿剪切结合强度测试中434个断裂界面进行了标记。光学显微镜图像在100倍放大。CNN专门训练光学图像来分类故障模式,并与专家人类观察者进行比较。分类性能按F1加权评分进行评估。CNN在20倍范围内的平均±SD为0.893±0.032。个别专家观察员的F1得分分别为0.895、0.911和0.824。汇总成共识参考时,专家共识F1得分为0.914。错误分类主要涉及试件的破坏模式比例接近预定义的阈值,将混合破坏与主要的粘结破坏分开。基于轮廓学的地面真值训练的CNN在从光学显微镜图像中分类故障模式方面取得了专家级的性能。这种自动化方法减少了操作者依赖的可变性,并提供了一种可扩展的客观替代视觉分类,代表了牙粘连研究中标准化失效模式分析的重大进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书